OK, I honestly can't bother to look for it now, but last I checked, EA wants to do a significant support for PSP, and thinking that they would force a team so enthused about it to focus their attention elsewhere, just seems like nurturing a false hope to me.
OK, I honestly can't bother to look for it now, but last I checked, EA wants to do a significant support for PSP, and thinking that they would force a team so enthused about it to focus their attention elsewhere, just seems like nurturing a false hope to me.
I remember it was an interview by Eurogamer and it was held before they were bought by EA. And EA has a history of whoring franchises. Just look at Battlefield Vietnam, was a shit sequel, some better graphics but nothing new at all.
To be accurate, it was held before any announcement that EA bought Criterion. Negotiations may very well have been underway at the time of the interview.
I remember it was an interview by Eurogamer and it was held before they were bought by EA. And EA has a history of whoring franchises. Just look at Battlefield Vietnam, was a shit sequel, some better graphics but nothing new at all.
I remember it was an interview by Eurogamer and it was held before they were bought by EA. And EA has a history of whoring franchises. Just look at Battlefield Vietnam, was a shit sequel, some better graphics but nothing new at all.
We'll see, I guess. I know I'm very much looking forward to what Criterion can do on the PSP, but if they can develop more versions of BO4 at the same time, that much the better. I think however, that even EA knows which games can be whored and which cannot. That's why we don't get a yearly SSX update, for example.
So, they skipped a year for the 3rd one. If the 3rd had sold well, I guarantee we'd be seeing another this year. They didn't exactly "know" when to rest the series. I think they had to be told by consumers.
In any case, your point is valid, and you have to rest franchises that can't support yearly sequels. Absence makes the heart grow fonder.