• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Charter Communications to Merge with Time Warner Cable and Acquire BrightHouse

Status
Not open for further replies.

Shard

XBLAnnoyance
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/ch...ouse-networks-2015-05-26?reflink=MW_news_stmp

STAMFORD, Conn., NEW YORK and SYRACUSE, N.Y., May 26, 2015 /PRNewswire/ -- Charter Communications, Inc. CHTR, -1.86% (together with its subsidiaries "Charter") and Time Warner Cable Inc. TWC, +3.42% today announced that they have entered into a definitive agreement for Charter to merge with Time Warner Cable. The deal values Time Warner Cable at $78.7 billion. Charter will provide $100.00 in cash and shares of a new public parent company ("New Charter") equivalent to 0.5409 shares of CHTR for each Time Warner Cable share outstanding. The deal values each Time Warner Cable share at approximately $195.71 based on Charter's market closing price on May 20, or approximately $200 based on Charter's 60-trading day volume weighted average price. In addition, Charter will provide an election option for each Time Warner Cable stockholder, other than Liberty Broadband Corporation ("Liberty Broadband") or Liberty Interactive Corporation, who will receive all stock, to receive $115.00 of cash and New Charter shares equivalent to 0.4562 shares of CHTR for each Time Warner Cable share they own.

In addition, Charter and Advance/Newhouse Partnership (a parent of Bright House Networks, LLC) today announced that the two companies have amended the agreement which the two parties signed and announced on March 31, 2015, whereby Charter will acquire Bright House Networks ("Bright House") for $10.4 billion. That agreement, as amended, provides for Charter and Advance/Newhouse to form a new partnership (the "Partnership") of which New Charter will own between approximately 86% and 87% and of which Advance/Newhouse will own between approximately 13% and 14%, depending on the Time Warner Cable shareholders' cash election option described above. The consideration to be paid to Advance/Newhouse by Charter will include common and convertible preferred units in the Partnership, in addition to $2 billion in cash. The common and convertible preferred partnership units will each be exchangeable into shares of New Charter. The Charter-Advance/Newhouse transaction is expected to close contemporaneously with the Charter-Time Warner Cable transaction.

The combination of Charter, Time Warner Cable and Bright House will create a leading broadband services and technology company serving 23.9 million customers in 41 states. The announced transactions will drive investment into the combined entity's advanced broadband network, allow for wider deployment of new competitive facilities based WiFi networks in public places, and the footprint expansion of optical networks to serve the large marketplace of small and medium sized businesses. This will result in faster broadband speeds, better video products, including more high definition channels, more affordable phone service and more competition, for consumers and businesses. The scale of the new entity will also result in greater product innovation, bringing new and advanced services to consumers and businesses, including Charter's Spectrum Guide and World Box and other product innovations. And Charter's commitment to superior products and outstanding customer service, and its strategy of investing in insourcing and returning offshore jobs to America, will not only benefit the combined companies' customers, but will also enhance opportunities for employees of the new company.

Much more at the link above.
 
Honestly I have no idea, I haven't used Charter since 2003 (I know because I still have my Steam ID to be an @charter.net email that has been dead for over 10 years).
 

Mirk

Member
No no no. If TW fucks up my internet I am going to be pissed! I have had charter for 8 years and it has been great. Fuck
 

Busty

Banned
If this does go through the first order of business should be to change the name from Time Warner Cable to..., anything, literally anything.

The Time Warner Cable brand is toxic at this point and isn't even part of fucking Time Warner anymore so what's the point in...,

I give up.

Hope the government stops this.

Well it certainly makes more sense than the Comcast merger.
 

antonz

Member
Terrible for everyone even if Charter treats you well. The last thing the industry needs is less competition.
 

Bessy67

Member
Throw me in the "hope the government stops this" camp.
Why? As a current Time Warner customer I really hope this goes through.

Terrible for everyone even if Charter treats you well. The last thing the industry needs is less competition.
There already is no competition though. In a lot of areas there's only one choice for cable and high speed internet. I can only get Time Warner where I am, so even though other cable companies exist it's not like there's competition.
 

geardo

Member
Indeed, though isn't Charter supposed to be among the best of providers?

That's a low bar. I have Charter. In the past they've arbitrarily raised my rates without explanation, and have harassed me with constant marketing phone calls and junk-mail.
 
This will be extremely amusing to me if it goes through. My area used to be serviced by Charter Communications, and then they sold it to Cobridge Communications who then it sold it to Time Warner Cable after a year.
 

CornDogg

Member
I wish I still could get Charter. After moving, my only choice now is Mediacom, and their prices (and having bandwidth caps) look shitty by comparison.
 
As a Charter subscriber, I'm really worried.

The announced transactions will drive investment into the combined entity's advanced broadband network, allow for wider deployment of new competitive facilities based WiFi networks in public places, and the footprint expansion of optical networks to serve the large marketplace of small and medium sized businesses.

I'll believe this bullshit when I fucking see it.
 
If Comcast couldn't win approval I am having a hard time seeing how Charter is going to be able to pull this off.
Ehh, TWC and Comcast merging was on an entirely different level, given both Comcast's size and their ownership of NBC Universal.

Comcast has 27 million subscribers. Combined, Charter and TWC will have 24 million.

This could go through. Not saying I want it to - I definitely don't - but it's not nearly as big of a mountain to climb as the TWC/Comcast merger was.

In any case, thank God for Title II. Everyone needs to vote in 2016 to make sure it sticks.
 

goodcow

Member
They won't make you service better, they'll just make Charter worse.

For years I heard everyone always complain about how shitty TWC is. I recently switched from Verizon DSL to TWC, and the change has been amazing.

Verizon was charging me $53 for 7/1 on a grandfathered dry-loop line. FiOS isn't an option in my building yet, despite living in Manhattan.

TWC is charging me $35 for 50/5.

Honestly, I should've switched earlier.
 

Seraphis Cain

bad gameplay lol
This will be extremely amusing to me if it goes through. My area used to be serviced by Charter Communications, and then they sold it to Cobridge Communications who then it sold it to Time Warner Cable after a year.

Yep, same exact thing here. Cobridge wasn't terrible, I guess. Didn't really have them long enough to make a solid judgement.

Really hope this doesn't go through, though.
 

aeolist

Banned
Why? As a current Time Warner customer I really hope this goes through.


There already is no competition though. In a lot of areas there's only one choice for cable and high speed internet. I can only get Time Warner where I am, so even though other cable companies exist it's not like there's competition.

it's more than just competing for home/business broadband customers in a given geographical area, it's about network interconnection rates, content licensing, and bullying services like netflix. when ISPs get larger the potential for anti-consumer behavior on all fronts increases greatly.
 
To block a merger I feel that the government needs a compelling reason. With the Comcast deal I could see the compelling reason, as both companies are so large and entrenched in the industry, including NBC being a part of the bargain.

As much as I don't LIKE the idea of consolidation, I don't think that me not liking something is a compelling reason to stop them. So I say, let it go through.
 

Drek

Member
I feel like this one will get the go-ahead.

Probably, as it creates a near duopoly which has never been a position regulators have been afraid to establish. Comcast getting TWC would have been one huge juggernaut and everyone else feeding on scraps, so a near monopoly with real potential to remove "near" from that in short order.

As a Charter customer I'm not a fan because the TWC people need to stay the hell away from my service, but from a business/regulatory standpoint this is the best of a bad bunch. Time Warner will dump TWC. No new company is going to throw it's hat in the ring at the prices those currently in the business would value TWC at. Regulators can't expect the parent company of TWC to take pennies on the dollar for competitive balance reasons within a market segment they're trying to leave. So regulators need to regulate knowing that at some point they have to say yes to one of these deals. This one is a whole lot better than stalling another 6 months to a year and seeing Comcast come back around in some mildly re-worked proposal once again.
 

phaonaut

Member
Have had charter service for around 10 years now and its been pretty great, especially once they dropped their tiers for a single plan. Hope nothing changes.
 
It would be great if this actually caused them to compete with Comcast. I really want another cable internet option in my area.

Nah, they're never going to actually compete with each other. They have territorial monopolies and they're going to do their damndest to keep it that way.

This is why Title II is so important.
 
It would be great if this actually caused them to compete with Comcast. I really want another cable internet option in my area.

It would be fantastic if any cable companies competed, but they're singularly territorial like the mob. The cable cartels like stay out of each others' way.
 
Charter be like, "We're not fucking our customers. They're generally happy with us –– Higgins! How can we fix that?"
"We could... merge with one of the worst companies in America and adopt their practices!"
 

gutshot

Member
I have Time Warner so I guess this is good news for me? Probably will just stick with whatever they end up becoming until Google Fiber is ready. Google is supposedly laying the fiber in our neighborhood in a couple months, so not much longer to wait!
 
As a TWC I'm on the fence here. I'm not exactly happy with the speeds I get for the price however TWC doesn't have a cap and I've seen how many GB of data I use a month and I'm thankful for not having a cap.
 

kirby_fox

Banned
If they didn't let Sprint and Tmobile merge, I don't think they'd let this happen. Especially when I read this is basically the second, third and fourth largest companies merging.

The main issue being that there's no competition anyway. Maybe they'll deny it and set a better way for these places to compete.
 

SpaceHorror

Member
Not sure how I feel about this as a happy Charter customer. If it makes things better or things at least stay the same, whatever.

I just hope Charter doesn't finally fuck over its goodwill and join the villains.
 
NICE. Unlike the Comcast/TWC merger this makes me happy. Having frequently gone down to North Carolina (where they have charter) their internet is super fast even at the lower prices, so this should make things very very interestling.

Of course, now we're entering into having 1-2 cable providers nationwide again. We're already down to AT&T and Verizon for home phones, now Comcast vs. TWC will be a war.
 

borghe

Loves the Greater Toronto Area
Terrible for everyone even if Charter treats you well. The last thing the industry needs is less competition.

fewer companies does not mean less competition. charter and TWC operate in virtually exclusive areas. The only real competitive difference if this were to happen is... a name change.. that's it.

Comcast was largely the same situation physically (actual owning copper in the ground). The big difference with Comcast is they were already the #1 provider by a substantial margin, on top of owning one of the largest entertainment production companies in the world. As someone else pointed out, these two merging STILL wouldn't be as big as Comcast, and would result in virtually no lost competition.

The dish situations years ago were also different, in that they actually WERE competition in any given area because of the way satellite can be obtained from almost anywhere in the continental US.

Anywho.. also as others have pointed out.. I mean it could go either way. Charter could be shitty'ed up by TWC... or TWC could be improved by Charter... who knows. Either way, I wouldn't be surprised if this goes through. Not really any major obstacles that I can see.

Exactly. They should be breaking these companies up and making them compete.

There's really no need to. Basically these are internet providers at this point, and there are typically a number in any given area.. The (formerly) phone company, the (formerly) cable company.. the wireless companies.. medium distance wifi services.. on top of that federal regulation requires the companies owning the copper and/or frequencies to allow others to buy capacity over those systems and resell it. tl;dr if there was actually an ability to compete in a segment, companies already have the ability to do so because of this regulation.. that they don't is a pretty strong statement on exactly how thin margins on the market are.
 
I'm cool with this as long as it doesn't fuck things up on the Charter side and could be good news for the TWC side. Though I'm still hoping Charter increases their damn upload speeds at some point. 60/4 and 100/5 is just too out of whack.


Charter is not Comcast, Charter is pretty much a pimple on Comcast Media's ample ass.
 
Like, no.... but I'm okay with this. Charter is not as big as Comcast so adding some fluff to their already existing market isn't terrible. Yet, they still run the risk of being too big and I hate thinking that way. I'm a town away from charter but I heard they aren't too bad, but they aren't exactly out the woods similarly to Comcast. We'll see...
 

alstein

Member
How come TWC wants to be bought so bad?

The CEOs have huge buyout clauses in their contracts, that's why. Seriously.

As a TWC I'm on the fence here. I'm not exactly happy with the speeds I get for the price however TWC doesn't have a cap and I've seen how many GB of data I use a month and I'm thankful for not having a cap.

Charter dumped their caps last year. I don't think they'd dare to bring them back with Title II now.

I think with this- I'm not as opposed as I am with Comcrap, but I'd want conditions on not screwing over areas with worse competition, and no data cap provisions as a condition to any acquisition.
 
The risk with these mergers isn't competition. Cable companies don't compete with each other, so it's really not going to have much of an impact in that sense. They compete with satellite (at least in TV) and with U-verse/FiOS is select areas, but in large swaths of the country competition is virtually nonexistent.

The problem with Comcast, and what makes them so evil, is that they're trying to amass a huge number of cable/internet subscribers while also amassing a huge of amount of media. They want to be the ones making the content and delivering the content.

That's why shooting down the TWC/Comcast merger was critically important, and why stopping this merger is far less important.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom