I always hear in the news about the potential for nanoparticles, so this naturally threw me for a loop when I saw it in the paper today. Thought I would share this with GAF:
http://www.straight.com/article-404589/vancouver/tiny-nanoparticles-could-be-big-problem?page=0%2C1
The disconcerting thing is that this stuff is pretty much everywhere now. I need to do more research on this, but I'm always reminded of the double-edged sword of technology. This is another potential example.
http://www.straight.com/article-404589/vancouver/tiny-nanoparticles-could-be-big-problem?page=0%2C1
In the journal Cancer Research in 2009, environmental-health professor Robert Schiestl coauthored the first comprehensive study of how titanium-dioxide nanoparticles affect the genes of live animals. Mice in his study suffered DNA and chromosomal damage after drinking water with the nanoparticles for five days.
When inhaled, some types of nanoparticles have been shown to act like asbestos, inflaming lung tissue and leading to cancer. In 2009, the World Health Organizations International Agency for Cancer Research declared titanium dioxide to be possibly carcinogenic to humans after studies found that inhaling it in nanoparticle form caused rats to develop lung cancer and mice to suffer organ damage.
Nanoparticles can also hurt the skin. All those nanoparticles in skin creams and sunscreens may be behind a rise in eczema rates in the developed world, according to a 2009 study in the journal Experimental Biology and Medicine. The study found that titanium-dioxide nanoparticles caused mice to develop eczema. The nanoparticles can play a significant role in the initiation and/or progression of skin diseases, the study said.
The disconcerting thing is that this stuff is pretty much everywhere now. I need to do more research on this, but I'm always reminded of the double-edged sword of technology. This is another potential example.