B'z-chan said:Its CG? If it is wow. IF not WOW. Either way this is going to be great.
sefskillz said:It looks awful clean to be stop motion.
This is a stop motion animated feature film, based on a 19th Century Russian folktale, where a man mistakenly weds a corpse.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, Burton had shit to do with Nightmare. He was on set for less than ten days out of the two year shooting period, and that's straight from Selick's mouth. Burton was on a different continent for the vast majority of the shoot worrying about Batman Returns. His creative contribution was primarily a poem he wrote in the 80s that featured only Jack, Zero and Santa Claus.Trevelyon said:It seems like a similar situation to what Burton was doing in 1992. He was directing Returns for WB, while producing The Nightmare Before Christmas & having his friend, Henry Selick direct. While this year, he has both Charlie and the Chocolate Factory remake & this to juggle between.
But it I think Tim will have more input into the Corpse Bride then Nightmare.
Corpse Bride has been filming since February 2003. Burton's name didn't appear as a co-director until June 2004. Now, January 2005, he says they're still working on the story and doing as much improvisation as possible. I see a lot to worry about.BarneyBP said:I'm sure they've got the basic ideas fleshed out and are just fine tuning some portions as they work on them, September is still a ways away.
Be not afraid!
Mars Attacks! suffers from a similar problem in that it is also a collection of disjointed set pieces. It doesn't come together as a cohesive whole at all. Mars Attacks! is Burton's failure to do for old B-rated sci-fi what Tarantino succeeded in doing with Kill Bill for spaghetti westerns and Asian genres. He doesn't fail in paying homage and adding some fresh twists, but he fails to pull it all together. It's just a mess of multiple poorly realized storylines. He spread himself too thin. There are some great moments in Mars Attacks! but there's also a lot of crap.Dan said:Big Fish was an emotionally manipulative collection of disjointed set pieces that ultimately made a point that had no need of being made. It was utterly forgettable.
Duh, it's a new rule, any character played by Depp in a Burton film is now obligated to run into something head first.Littleberu said:This doesn't look very fun to watch. Oh, he's running into a tree! FUNNY ISN'T IT!?!
Thank you for that detailed retort.Willco said:Your opinion sucks, Dan.
Dan said:Thank you for that detailed retort.
I'd say the script was pretty great. In such a short amount of time you're introduced to many characters that had surprisingly nuanced personalities for a 76 minute picture. Every scene is either developing a character (or the world, which in itself is a very active character) or the story. I find the film to be quite engaging for reasons beyond the visual attributes. I think it's a great little vignette about a man who discovers something new and dives in head first without seeing the whole picture or knowing the consequences, and then has to deal with that.Mama Smurf said:Funny, I found Nightmare Before Christmas to have a pretty weak story personally. Oh the ideas were there, and were great, but I just sat there thinking: "I guess you've got to like the songs more than I do to get into this film."
I suppose that's possible, although I don't remember Sleepy Hollow being either significantly cheesy or self-conscious of how overly dramatic it was. It might be a movie I should watch again, I don't know.Wasn't the cheesy, over the top drama of the characters the whole point of Sleepy Hollow? As the film made no pretences at seriousness and made sure practically every character you saw was under suspicion at some point, that's the feeling I got.
Dan said:I'd say the script was pretty great. In such a short amount of time you're introduced to many characters that had surprisingly nuanced personalities for a 76 minute picture. Every scene is either developing a character (or the world, which in itself is a very active character) or the story. I find the film to be quite engaging for reasons beyond the visual attributes. I think it's a great little vignette about a man who discovers something new and dives in head first without seeing the whole picture or knowing the consequences, and then has to deal with that.
I suppose that's possible, although I don't remember Sleepy Hollow being either significantly cheesy or self-conscious of how overly dramatic it was. It might be a movie I should watch again, I don't know.
Hmm, alright, Netflix queue +1.Mama Smurf said:I think you should, it totally had that self concious vibe. They basically made Depp's character a bumbling idiot who practically accused the entire village as clues unravelled.
I'm sure you did...chigiri said:Had totally forgotten about this (eeik)!
Nahhhh...Mike Works said:I'm sure you did...
GREEKBOY!
I suppose that's possible, although I don't remember Sleepy Hollow being either significantly cheesy or self-conscious of how overly dramatic it was. It might be a movie I should watch again, I don't know.