KuwabaraTheMan
Banned
Furret said:I think you're going to have to provide some proof that you're not a joke character.
If a story about a character that commits suicide after being told he's one of the greatest people that ever lived (that isn't silly, it's a basic fact if you're talking about influential artists) isn't nuanced narrative then what is?
What is this thick vein of subtle, nuanced storytelling from the RTD era that has passed so many of us by?
It's not a nuanced narrative because of the execution. It's 'bombastic' (the very thing people accuse RTD of doing, bizarrely enough). It feels like the writer is shaking me by the shoulder and telling me how I should be feeling.
The idea behind the story is fine. The first 3/4ths of the story are fine. It's only when they take Vincent to the present day that the storytelling goes to shit in favor of basically screaming at the audience and telling them how they should feel.
I think I've already given plenty of examples of what I considered great storytelling from the RTD era. I don't really feel the need to keep repeating myself on that front. I wrote out a pretty long post a few pages back.
Why would I be a joke character? It's not like this is a particularly rare point of view. If I was a joke character (which I would never be), I would probably be going on about how The Android Invasion is the greatest Doctor Who story of them all.
I wasn't aware that a Doctor Who fan loving Robert Holmes and Russell T. Davies was 'joke character' status.