• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Doctor Who Series Seven |OT| The Question You've Been Running From All Your Life

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mariolee

Member
Thanks for all of the answers guys!

Hmm :/. For me that was another case of brilliant setup and poor resolution.
Why couldn't the Doctor go back & see them? He could either go somewhere other than New York in 1938 and get a train or something, or visit them a few years later. The episode seemed to hinge on new rules of time travel that have never been mentioned before.
Angel of Liberty looked cool, but is pretty stupid really. How on earth could no-one see it moving?
And 10th Doctor would have totally blown up that final Angel afterwards. I mean, did he just leave it hanging around the graveyard?

Most of them were answered above, but for your final question, I thought the point of the Angels was that in their stone form nothing could break or kill them.

Things did happen as they were in the book. He could technically visit post-Amy's afterward. The book would be complete and everything would happen as it should.

Very true.
 

Diablos54

Member
Things did happen as they were in the book. He could technically visit post-Amy's afterward. The book would be complete and everything would happen as it should.
Didn't it say they never saw/would see the Doctor again? As soon as he read that final page, that was it.
 
Didn't it say they never saw/would see the Doctor again?

After the book is written, anything is possible. Up to that point the afterward was written they never saw The Doctor. Beyond that, he could have visited. Met them in London if New York was too dangerous.
 

Mariolee

Member
Didn't it say they never saw/would see the Doctor again? As soon as he read that final page, that was it.

I don't think the page said they would never see the Doctor again. It said something like "You probably won't want to visit New York for awhile" which implies that he MAY be able to visit them. Moffat leaving it open I suppose.
 
The whole can't return thing is weird, and will probably never get a full explanation - see Dalek Caan pulling Davros out of and the Time Lords weaselling their way out of the "locked" Time War, and specifically in the case of Amy, the whole of The Girl Who Waited, where knowing her own future forced her to change it. I don't think there really are any rules, just what works at the time.
 
I think if the Doctor DID visit them, he'd fuck up the pre-established dates of death. And then New York would probably explode under time duress
 

Diablos54

Member
After the book is written, anything is possible. Up to that point the afterward was written they never saw The Doctor again. Beyond that, he could have visited. Met them in London if New York was too dangerous.
But aren't they trapped in the building full of Angels? Since Rory died there without seeing Amy again that's my best bet. But then, wasn't that whole paradox erased? I dunno. I get why the TARDIS can't go anywhere near there but apart from that I have no clue. :p
 

Randdalf

Member
The fact that we knew that this was their last episode took some of the surprise out of it. I would love them to kill/remove a companion or reveal a new Doctor (without it being said whether the actor is signed for a new season or not) without telling anyone at all, it would be great. When David Tennant started regenerating in the penultimate episode of the 4th series, everyone was abuzz about whether he was actually dying and who would replace him. Keeping it secret would be difficult, but the payoff would be fantastic.
 
The whole can't return thing is weird, and will probably never get a full explanation - see Dalek Caan pulling Davros out of and the Time Lords weaselling their way out of the "locked" Time War, and specifically in the case of Amy, the whole of The Girl Who Waited, where knowing her own future forced her to change it. I don't think there really are any rules, just what works at the time.

You can look to The Girl in the Fireplace for some understanding. After reading the letter about her death, he can never go back to the period between last telling her to wait and when he reads the letter because the letter says he never went back.

However, in this case, there is room for The Doctor to go back.
 
it's a fixed point in time, things had to happen as they were in the book. That's my basic explanation anyway. :p

Ah, yeah, I forgot about the fixed point in time stuff. I guess I'll accept that, although it's still weird he can't come pick them up a few years later when it's no longer fixed...unless because he's seen their death/gravestone that means they have to stay in New York and their deaths are fixed. That's what I'll stick with.

Angel of Liberty looked cool, but is pretty stupid really. How on earth could no-one see it moving?

I was hoping the Angel of Liberty would fit more into the Angel's plan/the main plot. As it stands, it was basically "Hey, this episode's going to take place in Manhattan. You know what would be cool? Having an Angel as the Statue of Liberty!" It didn't really impact the episode. Maybe if there had been a throwaway line like "they're using the hotel to power the Angel of Liberty to destroy the universe."
 
Most of them were answered above.

Err, where? Can't see any answers to the main question of why the Doctor couldn't visit them somewhere other than New York '38.

Time travel used to be left rather vague & hand-wavy, and I think Moffat's decision to make it more front-and-centre can be an issue because you can't really do it justice in a family show.
 

Mariolee

Member
But aren't they trapped in the building full of Angels? Since Rory died there without seeing Amy again that's my best bet. But then, wasn't that whole paradox erased? I dunno. I get why the TARDIS can't go anywhere near there but apart from that I have no clue. :p

No, because apparently the building never existed.
 
You can look to The Girl in the Fireplace for some understanding. After reading the letter about her death, he can never go back to the period between last telling her to wait and when he reads the letter because the letter says he never went back.

However, in this case, there is room for The Doctor to go back.

River had already written that that was Amy's last farewell. That's close enough.
 
The Doctor technically can visit a fixed point, he just can't change it without causing a lot of shit to go wrong or the universe course correcting itself in some twisted way (ie. Waters of Mars).
 

Mariolee

Member
Err, where? Can't see any answers to the main question of why the Doctor couldn't visit them somewhere other than New York '38.

Time travel used to be left rather vague & hand-wavy, and I think Moffat's decision to make it more front-and-centre can be an issue because you can't really do it justice in a family show.

Well, no one has come to a distinct consensus, but people have tried to answer it above your original post.

River had already written that that was Amy's last farewell. That's close enough.

Again, that's Moffat making it seem final without fully committing in order for it to be left open for future episodes.
 

Diablos54

Member
No, because apparently the building never existed.
Yea that's what I thought, erased paradox.

Green Scar said:
River had already written that that was Amy's last farewell. That's close enough.
Explains why the Doctor freaked out when he saw the final chapter title. You don't see someone again after a last farewell. At least you don't normally.
 
River had already written that that was Amy's last farewell. That's close enough.

The how does River know for sure? She would have to know that The Doctor never travels back to visit her from the present to the point of everyone involved being dead. River only knows up until the point she writes the chapter heading. Beyond that, anything is still possible.
 
I preferred Rory & Amy's 'exit' in The God Complex, to be honest.

And why should reading a book set events in stone? What if the book was fiction, or part-fiction? FRIDGE LOGIC.
 

Mariolee

Member
I preferred Rory & Amy's 'exit' in The God Complex, to be honest.

And why should reading a book set events in stone? What if the book was fiction, or part-fiction? FRIDGE LOGIC.

Wait...what? River wrote the book, meaning it was non-fiction. And seeing as how it had been correct in every parallel event that happened as they were reading, it was definitely accurate.
 
I preferred Rory & Amy's 'exit' in The God Complex, to be honest.

And why should reading a book set events in stone? What if the book was fiction, or part-fiction? FRIDGE LOGIC.

But it wasn't fiction and events quickly prove that. I'm saying, anything beyond the chapters of the book is completely open though.
 

Diablos54

Member
The how does River know for sure? She would have to know that The Doctor never travels back to visit her from the present to the point of everyone involved being dead. River only knows up until the point she writes the chapter heading. Beyond that, anything is still possible.
Amy wrote the book, River got it published (I think). I guess anytime after it was published could be where the Doctor goes back but then things would get wibbly wobbly.
 
I'll have a continuing nervousness that they'll ruin this ending later on like they did with Rose's exit.

Wait what did they do to Rose?


Loved that episode - the graveyard scene in the end felt a bit strange, I see why it was necessary - but I feel as though they could have given Amy her farewell on top of the building.

I also feel like they could have done something stronger regarding the Angels - rather than wiping the majority of them from existence I think I would have preferred if they simply broke the time lock around that building - and the Angels had to move on - seems a bit strange to just paradox them out of existence.

Also poor Rory's dad :( - he didnt even get a segment.
 
The how does River know for sure? She would have to know that The Doctor never travels back to visit her from the present to the point of everyone involved being dead. River only knows up until the point she writes the chapter heading. Beyond that, anything is still possible.

Doesn't matter, her dumb ass wrote it anyway! :lol

Yeah it's left open, but the Doctor wouldn't freak the fuck out twice if he didn't know it was a done deal... for now. Personally, I hope they never come back. Actually, I was kinda hoping them throwing themselves off the Quay was the end of it, but I'm a masochist apparently.
 

Mariolee

Member
Another thing I thought was odd was them traveling back to 2012 from the "present" timeline of the 2020's (which was implied in The Power of Three) Like, what changed in New York between 2012 and the 2020's that you had to travel back in time in-universe wise?

Doesn't matter, her dumb ass wrote it anyway! :lol

Yeah it's left open, but the Doctor wouldn't freak the fuck out twice if he didn't know it was a done deal... for now. Personally, I hope they never come back. Actually, I was kinda hoping them throwing themselves off the Quay was the end of it, but I'm a masochist apparently.

lol that would've been incredibly dark
 
Amy wrote the book, River got it published. I guess anytime after it was published could be where the Doctor goes back but then things would get wibbly wobbly.

That wouldn't be wibbly wobbly at all. Anything after the books is written is fair game. If Amy and Rory decide to take a trip to post WWII London in the summer of 1946 (or post whenever the book was written) and The Doctor happens to be traveling with Oswin at that time, they could theoretically bump into each other without the universe blowing up. There is no paradox there. Nothing was written that contradicts that either.

Edit: Unless the book was written close to Amy's death, which they should have established, then it would make sense that she didn't see him after writing that ending.
 
That wouldn't be wibbly wobbly at all. Anything after the book is written is fair game. If Amy and Rory decide to take a trip to post WWII London in the summer of 1946 (or post whenever the book was written) and The Doctor happens to be traveling with Oswin at that time, they could theoretically bump into each other without the universe blowing up. There is no paradox there. Nothing was written that contradicts that either.

Edit: Unless the book was written close to Amy's death, which they should have established, then it would make sense that she didn't see him after writing that ending.

Edit: For the new page, because I hate page endings.

So, what was the publish date for the book?
 
Wait...what? River wrote the book, meaning it was non-fiction. And seeing as how it had been correct in every parallel event that happened as they were reading, it was definitely accurate.

But it's just a book. What if the publishers decided to rewrite the ending to make it more exciting? Sorry, the more I think about this, the weaker it seems.

Also, bit strange we didn't get to see Rory & Amy living in 1938
unless it gets undone for the Anniversary show.
 
That wouldn't be wibbly wobbly at all. Anything after the books is written is fair game. If Amy and Rory decide to take a trip to post WWII London in the summer of 1946 (or post whenever the book was written) and The Doctor happens to be traveling with Oswin at that time, they could theoretically bump into each other without the universe blowing up. There is no paradox there. Nothing was written that contradicts that either.

Edit: Unless the book was written close to Amy's death, which they should have established, then it would make sense that she didn't see him after writing that ending.

She did say something like "we lived good lives" - so they alluded to it.
 

Diablos54

Member
Edit: Unless the book was written close to Amy's death, which they should have established, then it would make sense that she didn't see him after writing that ending.
It depends how far back the last Angel put them both. We know the date of the book so it can't have been before then. We also don't know when they died, since the grave only has their ages.

"That's the fucking stupidest thing you've ever said.

I love it."
I can imagine RTD spinning around going 'FANTASTIC!' while Moffat sprouts time travel and paradox details in the corner trying to get everything to work.
 

Ephidel

Member
I believe it was implied that River wrote the book and Amy wrote the Afterword.
It was. River said she'd have to get the book to Amy so Amy could get it published, and that she'd get her to write an afterword.

Which means River at least sees them again. Or sends them mail.
 

Diablos54

Member
Do we know when and where the Pond's ended up? Was it still NY during the same time period? Going by the type writer I would say yes, but then why can River visit and not the Doctor (Assuming River visited instead of finding another way to get Amy to write the Afterword)?

But it's just a book. What if the publishers decided to rewrite the ending to make it more exciting? Sorry, the more I think about this, the weaker it seems
River wouldn't let them, I guess. And I doubt they'd exactly be able to get one over on her either.
 

Diablos54

Member
They brought her back.
And gave her her own personal Doctor, I hated that. Doomsday was a perfect sendoff, only to be spoiled like that. Hopefully the same doesn't happen here.

Because River has a motorbike but The Doctor gets stuck in traffic :p
Lol, that explains why the TARDIS can't get there, but is there any reason he can't just use River's vortex manipulator?

TBH, I can't seeing this being it for the Pond's, it's been left so nicely open for the future. Unless there's some sort of concrete reason as to why he can't visit at some point. Plus, the grave says 'Williams'. Considering even River's name is Pond, that strikes me as quite odd.

It's beautifully circular and final as it is, and Amy and Rory live on, in a sense, through River. I wonder how long she'll continue to swing in and out for!
I can see River popping up once or twice a season for a few years, Jack style. At least until Moffat moves on, I'd say. Hopefully she does, she's great when she's not the focus of an ep/arc.
 
And gave her her own personal Doctor, I hated that. Doomsday was a perfect sendoff, only to be spoiled like that. Hopefully the same doesn't happen here.

50% of that was very likely forward-thinking ass-covering in case an aged Tennant shows up later on, mind. Not that I'm arguing with how Journey's End sours Doomsday - though the what happens there is also sad, just in a different way. Imagine being him, and letting her go for a replica of yourself!

This particular one I hope they never undo now. It's beautifully circular and final as it is, and Amy and Rory live on, in a sense, through River. I wonder how long she'll continue to swing in and out for!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom