King of the Potato People
Member
I enjoyed Rose's finale (well kinda Doomsday) more to be honest, but that was a decent end to two of the best companions.
Hmm :/. For me that was another case of brilliant setup and poor resolution.
Why couldn't the Doctor go back & see them? He could either go somewhere other than New York in 1938 and get a train or something, or visit them a few years later. The episode seemed to hinge on new rules of time travel that have never been mentioned before.
Angel of Liberty looked cool, but is pretty stupid really. How on earth could no-one see it moving?
And 10th Doctor would have totally blown up that final Angel afterwards. I mean, did he just leave it hanging around the graveyard?
Things did happen as they were in the book. He could technically visit post-Amy's afterward. The book would be complete and everything would happen as it should.
Didn't it say they never saw/would see the Doctor again? As soon as he read that final page, that was it.Things did happen as they were in the book. He could technically visit post-Amy's afterward. The book would be complete and everything would happen as it should.
Didn't it say they never saw/would see the Doctor again?
Didn't it say they never saw/would see the Doctor again? As soon as he read that final page, that was it.
I enjoyed Rose's finale (well kinda Doomsday) more to be honest, but that was a decent end to two of the best companions.
But aren't they trapped in the building full of Angels? Since Rory died there without seeing Amy again that's my best bet. But then, wasn't that whole paradox erased? I dunno. I get why the TARDIS can't go anywhere near there but apart from that I have no clue.After the book is written, anything is possible. Up to that point the afterward was written they never saw The Doctor again. Beyond that, he could have visited. Met them in London if New York was too dangerous.
The whole can't return thing is weird, and will probably never get a full explanation - see Dalek Caan pulling Davros out of and the Time Lords weaselling their way out of the "locked" Time War, and specifically in the case of Amy, the whole of The Girl Who Waited, where knowing her own future forced her to change it. I don't think there really are any rules, just what works at the time.
it's a fixed point in time, things had to happen as they were in the book. That's my basic explanation anyway.![]()
Angel of Liberty looked cool, but is pretty stupid really. How on earth could no-one see it moving?
Amy can get ganger Rory to live with in those remaining years.I'll have a continuing nervousness that they'll ruin this ending later on like they did with Rose's exit.
Most of them were answered above.
But aren't they trapped in the building full of Angels? Since Rory died there without seeing Amy again that's my best bet. But then, wasn't that whole paradox erased? I dunno. I get why the TARDIS can't go anywhere near there but apart from that I have no clue.![]()
You can look to The Girl in the Fireplace for some understanding. After reading the letter about her death, he can never go back to the period between last telling her to wait and when he reads the letter because the letter says he never went back.
However, in this case, there is room for The Doctor to go back.
Err, where? Can't see any answers to the main question of why the Doctor couldn't visit them somewhere other than New York '38.
Time travel used to be left rather vague & hand-wavy, and I think Moffat's decision to make it more front-and-centre can be an issue because you can't really do it justice in a family show.
River had already written that that was Amy's last farewell. That's close enough.
Yea that's what I thought, erased paradox.No, because apparently the building never existed.
Explains why the Doctor freaked out when he saw the final chapter title. You don't see someone again after a last farewell. At least you don't normally.Green Scar said:River had already written that that was Amy's last farewell. That's close enough.
I've seen Redshirts get beter send offs than that.
Fuck you Moffat, you are poision that is killing Doctor Who.
LOL. Dude that has some of the best eps of Who under his belt is killing Who? That's makes no sense.I've seen Redshirts get beter send offs than that.
Fuck you Moffat, you are poision that is killing Doctor Who.
River had already written that that was Amy's last farewell. That's close enough.
I've seen Redshirts get beter send offs than that.
Fuck you Moffat, you are poision that is killing Doctor Who.
I preferred Rory & Amy's 'exit' in The God Complex, to be honest.
And why should reading a book set events in stone? What if the book was fiction, or part-fiction? FRIDGE LOGIC.
I preferred Rory & Amy's 'exit' in The God Complex, to be honest.
And why should reading a book set events in stone? What if the book was fiction, or part-fiction? FRIDGE LOGIC.
Amy wrote the book, River got it published (I think). I guess anytime after it was published could be where the Doctor goes back but then things would get wibbly wobbly.The how does River know for sure? She would have to know that The Doctor never travels back to visit her from the present to the point of everyone involved being dead. River only knows up until the point she writes the chapter heading. Beyond that, anything is still possible.
I'll have a continuing nervousness that they'll ruin this ending later on like they did with Rose's exit.
The how does River know for sure? She would have to know that The Doctor never travels back to visit her from the present to the point of everyone involved being dead. River only knows up until the point she writes the chapter heading. Beyond that, anything is still possible.
Doesn't matter, her dumb ass wrote it anyway! :lol
Yeah it's left open, but the Doctor wouldn't freak the fuck out twice if he didn't know it was a done deal... for now. Personally, I hope they never come back. Actually, I was kinda hoping them throwing themselves off the Quay was the end of it, but I'm a masochist apparently.
Amy wrote the book, River got it published. I guess anytime after it was published could be where the Doctor goes back but then things would get wibbly wobbly.
That wouldn't be wibbly wobbly at all. Anything after the book is written is fair game. If Amy and Rory decide to take a trip to post WWII London in the summer of 1946 (or post whenever the book was written) and The Doctor happens to be traveling with Oswin at that time, they could theoretically bump into each other without the universe blowing up. There is no paradox there. Nothing was written that contradicts that either.
Edit: Unless the book was written close to Amy's death, which they should have established, then it would make sense that she didn't see him after writing that ending.
RTD: "Steven, I know I don't work there anymore... but WHAT IF THE STATUE OF LIBERTY (!) was a Weeping Angel?"
Wait...what? River wrote the book, meaning it was non-fiction. And seeing as how it had been correct in every parallel event that happened as they were reading, it was definitely accurate.
That wouldn't be wibbly wobbly at all. Anything after the books is written is fair game. If Amy and Rory decide to take a trip to post WWII London in the summer of 1946 (or post whenever the book was written) and The Doctor happens to be traveling with Oswin at that time, they could theoretically bump into each other without the universe blowing up. There is no paradox there. Nothing was written that contradicts that either.
Edit: Unless the book was written close to Amy's death, which they should have established, then it would make sense that she didn't see him after writing that ending.
It depends how far back the last Angel put them both. We know the date of the book so it can't have been before then. We also don't know when they died, since the grave only has their ages.Edit: Unless the book was written close to Amy's death, which they should have established, then it would make sense that she didn't see him after writing that ending.
I can imagine RTD spinning around going 'FANTASTIC!' while Moffat sprouts time travel and paradox details in the corner trying to get everything to work."That's the fucking stupidest thing you've ever said.
I love it."
Amy wrote the book, River got it published (I think). I guess anytime after it was published could be where the Doctor goes back but then things would get wibbly wobbly.
It is.I believe it was implied that River wrote the book and Amy wrote the Afterword.
It was. River said she'd have to get the book to Amy so Amy could get it published, and that she'd get her to write an afterword.I believe it was implied that River wrote the book and Amy wrote the Afterword.
River wouldn't let them, I guess. And I doubt they'd exactly be able to get one over on her either.But it's just a book. What if the publishers decided to rewrite the ending to make it more exciting? Sorry, the more I think about this, the weaker it seems
Wait what did they do to Rose?
Because River has a motorbike but The Doctor gets stuck in trafficbut then why can River visit and not the Doctor (Assuming River visited instead of finding another way to get Amy to write the Afterword)?
And gave her her own personal Doctor, I hated that. Doomsday was a perfect sendoff, only to be spoiled like that. Hopefully the same doesn't happen here.They brought her back.
Lol, that explains why the TARDIS can't get there, but is there any reason he can't just use River's vortex manipulator?Because River has a motorbike but The Doctor gets stuck in traffic![]()
I can see River popping up once or twice a season for a few years, Jack style. At least until Moffat moves on, I'd say. Hopefully she does, she's great when she's not the focus of an ep/arc.It's beautifully circular and final as it is, and Amy and Rory live on, in a sense, through River. I wonder how long she'll continue to swing in and out for!
And gave her her own personal Doctor, I hated that. Doomsday was a perfect sendoff, only to be spoiled like that. Hopefully the same doesn't happen here.