-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Does anyone else prefer the first Soul Calibur over the second?
- Thread starter Idioteque
- Start date
MrAngryFace
Banned
I prefer you to shut the fuck up.
DieNgamers
Member
@topic: No.
MrAngryFace
Banned
Yeah its a little late even on the west coast.
CajoleJuice
Member
I'm with you on this one. I played the first often up to the release of II, and it feels better. It's probably because of 4 years of playing, but no matter the reason, I prefer the first to the second. The second is awesome though.
HomerSimpson-Man
Member
Datrio said:
I think it's great that they are bringing back interactive cinemas and endings again for Soul Calibur 3.
CajoleJuice
Member
Wait, I just remembered the real reason SC1 > SC2. The announcer doesn't say, "But the soooul still burns" in SC2.
SC1 wins by default.
SC1 wins by default.
Myoclonic Jerk
Member
when I mashed buttons on SC1 I kicked many more asses than doing so in SC2
but Link ROCKSSS
but Link ROCKSSS
Red Scarlet
Member
I liked Soul Edge over Soul Calibur..never played SC2.
wind_steaker
Member
I prefer soul blade
I can't really say I prefer the first one over the second game play wise, but I did prefer the character designs in the original.
Really the main difference between the two games is when they were released, SC1 was an absolutely stellar title, while SC2 was a huge dissapointment to me.
That being said, I'm getting pretty excited about SC3. Hopefully it lives up to my expectations.
>_>
Really the main difference between the two games is when they were released, SC1 was an absolutely stellar title, while SC2 was a huge dissapointment to me.
That being said, I'm getting pretty excited about SC3. Hopefully it lives up to my expectations.
>_>
Parallax Scroll
Banned
The whole series is great, but I prefer the relative simplicity of SC1's graphics (on the Dreamcast) over SC2's.
VictimOfGrief
Banned
I like arcade versions better.
fiddlestick
Banned
ofc!
sc2 isnt even good
sc2 isnt even good
Kiriku said:
How is this even possible? Soul Blade was 25/30fps garbage, much less moves, much worse graphics, didn`t flow at all.. Soul Calibur is probaly the biggest improvement in a fighter sequel ever.
Oh well, I`m sure there are people who think VF1 is more fun than 4 also.
Drinky Crow
Banned
SC2 is light years better than the Dreamcast SC1.
Parallax Scroll
Banned
Street Fighter II?Gregory said:
MrAngryFace
Banned
Is it Retard Day or something? Who let these fuckwits in?
Drinky Crow
Banned
It DOES appear to be Retard Day, indeed. Sega Dreamcast fanboys who simply can't let the PS2's massive victory over their favorite hardware go are pretty much the very MASCOTS of retardation.
Gregory said:
Well, it could simply be that I bothered learning the game properly, how to play it...and I did it because I had fun while doing so. I didn't feel nearly as motivated to do that in Soul Calibur...I was very hyped for it, bought an import DC just for that very game...but it never "clicked" with me, for some reason. Hence, I had more fun with Soul Edge/Blade.
Also, I liked the presentation and atmosphere in Soul Edge/Blade more...the music, the edge master mode, the interactive endings, the different weapons you could use.
scissorfight
Banned
jesus h tapdancing christ
SC2 is crap?
close this abomination of a thread
SC2 is crap?
close this abomination of a thread
Here's the problem I had with SC1. Mitsarugi was WAY overpowered. His "pick you off the ground sweep" and keep doing over, and over again was shit.
They minimized that in SC2. Both have thier problems, but SC2 has less, and more importantly less game ruining ones.
Most of the charactors are balanced in SC2, and the graphics are 2x better ta' boot.
SC2 all the way.
(I write my opinions becuase me and my brother had ALOT, and most of the time VIOLENT marathons of SC1, and 2, and he used Mitsarugi, and I used Cervantes. We both came to the conclusion that SC2 is the more balanced of the two. We played a ton of matches of both, using the same charactors just to see, and without a shadow of a doubt, SC2 is the better, more balanced fighter)
They minimized that in SC2. Both have thier problems, but SC2 has less, and more importantly less game ruining ones.
Most of the charactors are balanced in SC2, and the graphics are 2x better ta' boot.
SC2 all the way.
(I write my opinions becuase me and my brother had ALOT, and most of the time VIOLENT marathons of SC1, and 2, and he used Mitsarugi, and I used Cervantes. We both came to the conclusion that SC2 is the more balanced of the two. We played a ton of matches of both, using the same charactors just to see, and without a shadow of a doubt, SC2 is the better, more balanced fighter)
Mr. Blonde
Member
SC2 is better but SC1 had Hwang and cooler looking stages.
Outcast2004
Banned
I prefer SC1 on DC.
I think it's more to do with the "WOW" factor. When SC came out back in 99 it was just amazing looking and still holds to this day.
Whereas SC2 I just felt underwhelmed. Just didn't feel like much of an improvment over the original.
I think it's more to do with the "WOW" factor. When SC came out back in 99 it was just amazing looking and still holds to this day.
Whereas SC2 I just felt underwhelmed. Just didn't feel like much of an improvment over the original.
Yeah, i had some great nostalgic moments created by that announcer.PuertoRicanJuice said:
The only thing i like better in SC2 are the gameplay and graphics (on a technical level). Visually, the stages in the first SC were more wowwing, the music was better, and i loved the intro of the first. Overall, the first game's presentation just rocked the second.
â Narayan
Member
Yep. I like the DC version ALOT better.
Similar threads
- Poll