Really? But that makes no sense.
A naked women would make me aroused, if she would wear lingerie for example, she would only make me more aroused.
Or for example, even in a BDSM relationship most people can have "normal" sex and don't need to be tied all the time, to get aroused. Still it is a fetish.
If you need it, to even get aroused that is more than a fetish, more like a mental disorder.
You define fetishes as what you deem as "non vanilla sex". And that's bullshit, sorry bro.
You are mixing up kinks and fetishes.
if you are aroused by something that is just a normal part of the body, it's a kink.
That's tits, butts, thighs, earlobes, armpits, feet, whatever.
If you are into midgets, it's still only a kink.
if you need some inanimate object either worn by you or the other person, or not worn at all to get aroused, it's a fetish.
Like shoes, hats, strap ons, whatever ( and also dessous).
I never really cared that much about the definition, but everything involved in regular sex which makes you horny, not a fetish.
So you think "fetish" is defined by if it's in Playboy it's not a fetish?