Support NeoGAF

[DMczaf]

More here: http://screenshots.teamxbox.com/gallery/1298/Fight-Night-Round-3/p1/

 

[brandonh83]

I wish that pussy would quit running away from me in the demo.

 

[syllogism]

4427 x 2490 ? Was that really necessary

edit: 2000 x 1125 now?. Those white pixels have never looked better

 

[Jerkface]

4427 x 2490 ? Was that really necessary

For magazines yeah, seems the EA PR department don't differentiate between print and online media though.

 

[TTP]

I think this is the biggest 70% all-white screen I've ever seen posted on GAF. This is Very True Hi-Def.

Edit: I see what u did there

 

[Cpl_Cain]

wowzers can't wait to get my hands on the full version

 

[Ninja Scooter]

DM should be banned for making this thread.

 

[DMczaf]

DM should be banned for making this thread.

HBK isnt in the game

 

[TheBig14]

You know the weird thing about the models in the X360 iteration of FN3 is that they seem ridiculously detailed (definitely texture and lighting wise) but at the same time not very believable. The animations are the number 1 culpret for this I believe. But I think something else is off, as well. I think the geometry and deformations aren't as detailed as in the original tech demo shown last E3 (ps3 unveiling). There is something about the less sculpted physiques of the boxers in that demo that is more believable than the physiques in the 360 version. Plus something about the facial and glove deformations which are off, as well.

Did anyone else notice this, too?

 

[FlyinJ]

Yeah, I noticed. It's definately not up to the "target renders".

But, I had zero faith in actually seeing anything even closely related to the target renders. So I can easily put aside the differences... I think the demo looks fantastic. And it's not that far from the renders (unlike Madden and Tiger Woods, which look absolutely nothing like the renders).

 

[phonte]

You know the weird thing about the models in the X360 iteration of FN3 is that they seem ridiculously detailed (definitely texture and lighting wise) but at the same time not very believable. The animations are the number 1 culpret for this I believe. But I think something else is off, as well. I think the geometry and deformations aren't as detailed as in the original tech demo shown last E3 (ps3 unveiling). There is something about the less sculpted physiques of the boxers in that demo that is more believable than the physiques in the 360 version. Plus something about the facial and glove deformations which are off, as well.

Did anyone else notice this, too?

ea has already said the ps3 would be getting a different, more proper version of the game. i think they'll probably include what's missing, tidying up the graphics significantly.

 

[Jerkface]

ea has already said the ps3 would be getting a different, more proper version of the game. i think they'll probably include what's missing, tidying up the graphics significantly.

No, they said it would be more akin to FN4 because of the time difference between release dates.

 

[phonte]

No, they said it would be more akin to FN4 because of the time difference between release dates.

yes, but i imagine they'll include in the ps3 game what was omitted from this version. that's basically what ea said.

 

[CR0N0S]

Yeah, I noticed. It's definately not up to the "target renders".

But, I had zero faith in actually seeing anything even closely related to the target renders. So I can easily put aside the differences... I think the demo looks fantastic. And it's not that far from the renders (unlike Madden and Tiger Woods, which look absolutely nothing like the renders).

can someone post a picture? I can't really see the difference you're talking about

 

[fly high ~ayunite~]

Why does everything look great but the shorts look shit?

 

[eeyore the donkey]

So you made this topic just to post a pic of ray ray...whom we can play the demo with??

"boxerS"... plural, where are the other pics man?

 

[TheBig14]

Why does everything look great but the shorts look shit?

You can't normal map shorts, especially since physics must be applied to them to have them flow naturally. That takes geometry.

If the shorts were part of the model...they wouldn't move independent of the model's movements.

 

[raYne]

So you made this topic just to post a pic of ray ray...whom we can play the demo with??

"boxerS"... plural, where are the other pics man?

...the first line in his post also says "More here:" with a link that you should click.

 

[eeyore the donkey]

ohhhhhh