Heh, Vennt's right, there's nothing wrong with stuff that "doesn't make sense" according to the "accepted" version of archaeology -- after all, we're learning new things every day. Science, as we've discussed ad nauseum is not about faith, it's about questions and evidence.
However, when people like CRAZY DUDE (as I prefer to call him) come up with half cocked theorums that have no basis in reality whatsoever, I tend to get a smidge bit peeved. It's one thing to question the accepted views, but this is just poppycock.
Not that I wouldn't mind excavating most of the sites he's actually been to. Envious, I am.
Edit: Speaking of controversial theories, here's one based in fact.
The Solutrian civilization, during the Ice Age managed to travel from Southern France during the last Ice Age, across the Atlantic Ocean and then settled into the eastern part of North America, long before the Bering Strait ever was permissable to travel.
The Clovis civilization's tool making method appears to support this theory, along with the fact that DNA "X" as scientists have called it, among the Native American population share common routes with Europeans rather than Asians.
Still, a supercivilization that totally pwned the earth and "seeded" the Great Civilzations of Yore from Mesopatamia and Egypt to South American Aztec and whatnot is just... ludicrous with the amount of evidence pointing in the entirely opposite direction.