Girl, song, music video... All AI.

clem84

Gold Member
Ok, it looks like AI, but the song is kind of catchy, and honestly sounds like the kind of cheesy pop song an actual person could write/produce in 2025. It's eerie, and kind of creepy if you ask me.

 
Looks good enough for me.

As usual there's two problems with AI vids. 1. Some reason they flip back and forth in super short 1-2 second segments instead of one long 5 min video scene. 2. The mouth can look weird.

But to be fair, theses advanced AI videos with people in them looks and sync up a lot better than the typical video game character with tons of people working on. Youd think an AI vid would fuck it up a lot more than paid people meticulously doing it like handcrafted art.

Most characters in gaming have zombie eyeballs, shitty mocap, and terrible mouth/teeth graphics.
 
gross baby mama GIF
 
We are going to go from manufactured bands by record companies to AI created bands in record time. Spotify has popular AI created or AI assisted artists already.
 
Last edited:
We are going to go from manufactured bands by record companies to AI created bands in record time. Spotify already has popular AI created or AI assisted artists already.
Gotta cut out those pesky middle men (the artists) to increase those profits, so you can buy your third vacation home and fifth yacht
 
The video was clearly AI, but if I had just heard the song, I probably wouldn't have been able to tell.

I've posted this before in another thread, but this is AI signing done right.

Randy Travis suffered a stroke several years ago that almost killed him. He can barely talk anymore and obviously can't sing but by using AI, he, his longtime producer, and another signer were able to record a song and it sounds great.

Here's the video:



And here's a video about the making/recording of the song:

 
The video was clearly AI, but if I had just heard the song, I probably wouldn't have been able to tell.

I've posted this before in another thread, but this is AI signing done right.

Randy Travis suffered a stroke several years ago that almost killed him. He can barely talk anymore and obviously can't sing but by using AI, he, his longtime producer, and another signer were able to record a song and it sounds great.

Here's the video:



And here's a video about the making/recording of the song:


Yup.

AI is getting good. Is it perfect? Nope. And why anyone is moaning that it should be doesnt make sense because even hand crafted art made my humans on a payroll cant even get things perfect either. So whats with the double standard?

Look at gaming and all the CGI effects in movies which are supposed to be done by expert graphic designers bit by bit. Tons of junk out there.

AI is just a tool. No different than a car assembly line. Some things AI/robotics can do better, some things humans do better. If human hands and heads cant beat a brainless robot than two things: 1. The worker isnt as good as they think they are. 2. Do a different role the AI/robot cant do well or at all.

If AI/automation was such societal murderers, everything would be done by machines, nobody would have jobs and unemployment rates would be 90%. The only people with jobs sill kicking around are CEOs and all the coders who build it. Nothing can be further from the truth.
 
Last edited:
Looks like the following still needs a bit of work:
  • The oversharpening effect
  • The eyes locking onto the 'camera' with zero movement
  • The eyes not blinking enough
  • The mouth movements

Otherwise it's not bad. The song itself is much more bland than an actual studio recording, which will be a problem going forward as there's just a different feeling in a good song when the production team and singer are in the same place together.
 
She looks like a combo of Denise Richards and Margot Robbie, imo.

For me, the biggest giveaway of it being AI is the framing (singer is almost always dead-center, staring into the camera). I would have a hard time telling it was AI otherwise. She seems kind of wooden, but so do a lot of people when they're being recorded.

Wild times we live in.
 
If AI/automation was such societal murderers, everything would be done by machines, nobody would have jobs and unemployment rates would be 90%. The only people with jobs sill kicking around are CEOs and all the coders who build it. Nothing can be further from the truth.


In entertainment, the process is working like this:

- First, kill talent. Remove talent as criteria for hiring and promotions. The real objective is to make talent a rare thing.

- Get people used to slop. Produce shit at industrial quantities. That's why today everything sucks: arts, music, literature, movies. Everything is full of template-made shit. That music video is a prime example, the pinnacle of mediocrity.

- Introduce AI with the messaging that it's "almost human". Sure, it can replace mediocre humans who already act like machines, not the talented ones they got rid of in the first step.

- Once people have embraced the "new reality", replace everyone and proclaim it "the future" under the false pretense that a machine can ever do the job of a talented human. It can't.


Anyone who believes that from an AI we will get the next Michael Jackson, Stephen King or Miyazaki is fucking insane.
 
Came across this AI band called Inferisborn. The songs "Hey God (Are You In There)", "Speaking to the Dead", and "Where Are You Now" are very good.


 
Some reason they flip back and forth in super short 1-2 second segments instead of one long 5 min video scene.

Guessing this guy made it himself on his own computer with wan 2.1 which is only able to generate 5 second videos. I wonder what Loras he used for the lip sync because that is the most impressive thing here IMO.
 
Anyone who believes that from an AI we will get the next Michael Jackson, Stephen King or Miyazaki is fucking insane.
You never know.

If this was before social media, nobody would ever claim or foresee people enjoying watching everyday joe streamers talking about random topic X, over professional journalism degree news channel reporters working at head offices with 100s of support staff.

On paper, news channels should be watched 100x more than Youtubers. Not the case because people realized you can get better content from amateurs.

This will be the case with AI too. If any AI stuff is better, people will choose it. If AI sucks donkey dick, people will stick to handcrafted media.
 
I thought musicians make most their money touring and doing concerts. ppl going to go to concerts just to hear some ai sing on a speaker/screen instead of a real live person ??
 
that's pretty cheap compared to the latest AI, not even using the better models for the base images nor the motion...

But for what it's worth, pop radio music is so formulaic now that I absolutely believe it can be, will be, and deserves to be destroyed by AI. Other genres can flourish free from AI for a long time, but the autotuned braindead awfulness of nearly every pop singer's work now is already less interesting than AI can be in the near future.
 
Last edited:
It is obvious still but for how long? The way AI is improving it won't take long at all to be very hard to discern (if not impossible).
 
It's gonna be CRAZY when the AI dolls get 'famous' in music or film, and then you can buy that doll to put her through the most horrific AI porn imaginable. Really break down the walls between reality and fantasy for a certain subset of internet dweller.
 
It's not GOOD but (after the first few uncanny seconds) it's...like, structurally sound and mostly believable. The song is repetitive fluff but (thus?) it's easy to mistake it for a real, generic pop song. The people aren't 100% but still have less uncanny valley to them than like 90% of video games that go for realism. And most crucially, the rate at which AI is improving is vastly higher than CGI or other tech-based art, so even if we see the seams today, what's it going to be like in six months? A year?

Like any new tech, a lot of us adults are going to complain and resist it. And whether or not we're right (we are) is pretty much irrelevant, as AI is going to continue to be pushed and the newer generation won't care.
 
Last edited:
It's very impressive. The thing that got me was that it was essentially the same thing repeated in slight variation which is exactly what I'd expect from ai designed to do this.

I thought the tune was pretty catchy, one of those simple but fun songs.

Going to be an interesting next 25 years.
 
I thought musicians make most their money touring and doing concerts. ppl going to go to concerts just to hear some ai sing on a speaker/screen instead of a real live person ??
Yes?


Also, this means that the studio who makes the AI artist will get this money (instead of the artist themselves), further lining their pockets and successfully closing the "concert loophole".
 
Last edited:
AI.- Did you know that Britney Spears' album "Oops!... I Did It Again" was made in six months? I can do it in 10 seconds.... You want me to make a music video and I'll have the same voice as hers? Or do you want a song with your desired lyrics and sound, and I'll sound just like her?
 
Imagine the fury of the titans among musicians and bands that you can make any music you want. He's going to instantly kill Lars Ulrich the hungry.
 
Top Bottom