Girl, song, music video... All AI.
- Thread starter clem84
- Start date
StreetsofBeige
Member
Looks good enough for me.
As usual there's two problems with AI vids. 1. Some reason they flip back and forth in super short 1-2 second segments instead of one long 5 min video scene. 2. The mouth can look weird.
But to be fair, theses advanced AI videos with people in them looks and sync up a lot better than the typical video game character with tons of people working on. Youd think an AI vid would fuck it up a lot more than paid people meticulously doing it like handcrafted art.
Most characters in gaming have zombie eyeballs, shitty mocap, and terrible mouth/teeth graphics.
As usual there's two problems with AI vids. 1. Some reason they flip back and forth in super short 1-2 second segments instead of one long 5 min video scene. 2. The mouth can look weird.
But to be fair, theses advanced AI videos with people in them looks and sync up a lot better than the typical video game character with tons of people working on. Youd think an AI vid would fuck it up a lot more than paid people meticulously doing it like handcrafted art.
Most characters in gaming have zombie eyeballs, shitty mocap, and terrible mouth/teeth graphics.
Reizo Ryuu
Member
IntentionalPun
Ask me about my wife's perfect butthole
It's really powerful stuff but I don't think that video is fooling many people.
The Cockatrice
I'm retarded?
That looked and sounded horrible.
jshackles
Gentlemen, we can rebuild it. We have the capability to make the world's first enhanced store. Steam will be that store. Better than it was before.
Gotta cut out those pesky middle men (the artists) to increase those profits, so you can buy your third vacation home and fifth yacht
Poppinfresh
Member
The video was clearly AI, but if I had just heard the song, I probably wouldn't have been able to tell.
I've posted this before in another thread, but this is AI signing done right.
Randy Travis suffered a stroke several years ago that almost killed him. He can barely talk anymore and obviously can't sing but by using AI, he, his longtime producer, and another signer were able to record a song and it sounds great.
Here's the video:
And here's a video about the making/recording of the song:
I've posted this before in another thread, but this is AI signing done right.
Randy Travis suffered a stroke several years ago that almost killed him. He can barely talk anymore and obviously can't sing but by using AI, he, his longtime producer, and another signer were able to record a song and it sounds great.
Here's the video:
And here's a video about the making/recording of the song:
StreetsofBeige
Member
Yup.
AI is getting good. Is it perfect? Nope. And why anyone is moaning that it should be doesnt make sense because even hand crafted art made my humans on a payroll cant even get things perfect either. So whats with the double standard?
Look at gaming and all the CGI effects in movies which are supposed to be done by expert graphic designers bit by bit. Tons of junk out there.
AI is just a tool. No different than a car assembly line. Some things AI/robotics can do better, some things humans do better. If human hands and heads cant beat a brainless robot than two things: 1. The worker isnt as good as they think they are. 2. Do a different role the AI/robot cant do well or at all.
If AI/automation was such societal murderers, everything would be done by machines, nobody would have jobs and unemployment rates would be 90%. The only people with jobs sill kicking around are CEOs and all the coders who build it. Nothing can be further from the truth.
Last edited:
March Climber
Member
Looks like the following still needs a bit of work:
Otherwise it's not bad. The song itself is much more bland than an actual studio recording, which will be a problem going forward as there's just a different feeling in a good song when the production team and singer are in the same place together.
- The oversharpening effect
- The eyes locking onto the 'camera' with zero movement
- The eyes not blinking enough
- The mouth movements
Otherwise it's not bad. The song itself is much more bland than an actual studio recording, which will be a problem going forward as there's just a different feeling in a good song when the production team and singer are in the same place together.
Grildon Tundy
Member
She looks like a combo of Denise Richards and Margot Robbie, imo.
For me, the biggest giveaway of it being AI is the framing (singer is almost always dead-center, staring into the camera). I would have a hard time telling it was AI otherwise. She seems kind of wooden, but so do a lot of people when they're being recorded.
Wild times we live in.
For me, the biggest giveaway of it being AI is the framing (singer is almost always dead-center, staring into the camera). I would have a hard time telling it was AI otherwise. She seems kind of wooden, but so do a lot of people when they're being recorded.
Wild times we live in.
Angry_Megalodon
Member
In entertainment, the process is working like this:
- First, kill talent. Remove talent as criteria for hiring and promotions. The real objective is to make talent a rare thing.
- Get people used to slop. Produce shit at industrial quantities. That's why today everything sucks: arts, music, literature, movies. Everything is full of template-made shit. That music video is a prime example, the pinnacle of mediocrity.
- Introduce AI with the messaging that it's "almost human". Sure, it can replace mediocre humans who already act like machines, not the talented ones they got rid of in the first step.
- Once people have embraced the "new reality", replace everyone and proclaim it "the future" under the false pretense that a machine can ever do the job of a talented human. It can't.
Anyone who believes that from an AI we will get the next Michael Jackson, Stephen King or Miyazaki is fucking insane.
Days like these...
Have a Blessed Day
Wake me up when AI can imitate James Brown, Freddie Mercury and Prince convincingly.
BennyBlanco
aka IMurRIVAL69
Guessing this guy made it himself on his own computer with wan 2.1 which is only able to generate 5 second videos. I wonder what Loras he used for the lip sync because that is the most impressive thing here IMO.
StreetsofBeige
Member
You never know.
If this was before social media, nobody would ever claim or foresee people enjoying watching everyday joe streamers talking about random topic X, over professional journalism degree news channel reporters working at head offices with 100s of support staff.
On paper, news channels should be watched 100x more than Youtubers. Not the case because people realized you can get better content from amateurs.
This will be the case with AI too. If any AI stuff is better, people will choose it. If AI sucks donkey dick, people will stick to handcrafted media.
MaestroMike
Gold Member
I thought musicians make most their money touring and doing concerts. ppl going to go to concerts just to hear some ai sing on a speaker/screen instead of a real live person ??
ResurrectedContrarian
Suffers with mild autism
that's pretty cheap compared to the latest AI, not even using the better models for the base images nor the motion...
But for what it's worth, pop radio music is so formulaic now that I absolutely believe it can be, will be, and deserves to be destroyed by AI. Other genres can flourish free from AI for a long time, but the autotuned braindead awfulness of nearly every pop singer's work now is already less interesting than AI can be in the near future.
But for what it's worth, pop radio music is so formulaic now that I absolutely believe it can be, will be, and deserves to be destroyed by AI. Other genres can flourish free from AI for a long time, but the autotuned braindead awfulness of nearly every pop singer's work now is already less interesting than AI can be in the near future.
Last edited:
Similar threads
- Poll