VALIS said:This would be excellent if it happened. Sales-Age Forums would have to cram it while the rest of us could talk about the game.
we'll see you a week or so. :lolNightmarecast25 said:Wow, people still care about GTA?
VeryHungryCaterpillar said:I don't agree that the open nature of the game makes it the most promising for next gen. Personally, I think Zelda or Metroid with the Revcon or Halo3 show more potential promise for innovation or fun than GTA. I think GTA will be important next gen, but unless it can do MMO and well, it will be same old, same old. And still sell a shitload.
Amir0x said:I know I'm going to regret this, but... "worser then horrible"?
Wishful thinking at it's best. Statisticians at Sales-Age would have to work overtime to calculate which version is selling better or worse, at what rate, speculate why, etc. etc.VALIS said:This would be excellent if it happened. Sales-Age Forums would have to cram it while the rest of us could talk about the game.
RamzaIsCool said:Hmm now i think about it, that just wrong english :lol
English is my third language if you where wondering so give me some slack here. Don't immidiately crucify the newbie here. Besides i have seen far worse here.
DenogginizerOS said:You will get gooder. Keep praticing.
RamzaIsCool said:sigh.....maybe you can practise with me.
Err.. not that userbase numbers wasn't a factor or anything, but it was also on Ps2 forever before they even confirmed that they were working on a Xbox/PC port. Most people who wanted it to begin with already had it for Ps2 by then.RamzaIsCool said:I don't really see this happening, because it sold so well on ps2 and then they picked some additional sales on pc/xbox. But like 80% of the sales where from the ps2 version, if history teaches us one thing is that you don't fix it if it aint broken (or was that the other way around?).
If that isn't the most blatant invite for a late night rendezvous.. I don't know what is...RamzaIsCool said:sigh.....maybe you can practise with me.
raYne said:Err.. not that userbase numbers wasn't a factor or anything, but it was also on Ps2 forever before they even confirmed that they were working on a Xbox/PC port. Most people who wanted it to begin with already had it for Ps2 by then.
If that isn't the most blatant invite for a late night rendezvous.. I don't know what is...
"Me' scuze', Me' scuze'"
Ape Escape 3?Himuro said::lol racist alert
raYne said:Err.. not that userbase numbers wasn't a factor or anything, but it was also on Ps2 forever before they even confirmed that they were working on a Xbox/PC port. Most people who wanted it to begin with already had it for Ps2 by then.
If that isn't the most blatant invite for a late night rendezvous.. I don't know what is...
"Me' scuze', Me' scuze'"
Jewbacca said:If I was Microsoft I would go ahead and take a hit and plop down 200 million dollars for GTA4 to be a exclusive, now that would be a kicker.
DenogginizerOS said:You will get gooder. Keep praticing.
That wasn't even the argument.. The argument was that according to you 80% of sales were from the Ps2 version. I'm simply giving another reason why that happened. Also, they aren't "risking" anything by making it a simultaneous release since the Ps2 (or 3 in this case) fanbase wouldn't be alienated at all.RamzaIsCool said:So would GTA be as big as it is today if it let say launched on the Xbox as main platform back then? I was trying to point out that if you have the mindshare on a playstation platform you can get pretty far saleswise. That's why I gave Resident Evil as example, in the PSX days Resident Evil was considered one of the big titles. Then CAPCOM began milking the franchise on diffrerent platforms, this deminished the appeal of the game and alienated it's PSX fanbase. Notice that like the big sellers are mostly the ones who are indentified with a single platform. like HALO-> Xbox, GTA-> PS2, Mario titles-> GC. If you as Rockstar got to this point on Playstation platforms why risk it?
So that's what all the kids are calling it these days? Hmm...Secondly that wasn't meant as an invite, it was to point out that his sentence wasn't proper english either (You will get gooder), so he gave me an advice to practise it, so in my crappy english way I advised him the same thing with saying that sentence. But off course those words are taken in another direction and is maken fun off. So that's my fault I suppose, with my bad luck of word choice. Anyway it was already stated that I suck at english, but I know enough to get my point across, so can we drop this now.....please.
Himuro said:This will ruin the graphical finesse the next gen GTA's have.
Speaking of which, since Bioware seems to be a predominately Xbox developer, what's to say they couldn't just make GTA for the 360? Or, dare I say, a simultaneous release on both the 360 and PS3?
RamzaIsCool said:I would reply, but I probably will type something stupid again, so...
RamzaIsCool said:I would reply, but I probably will type something stupid again, so...
drohne said:you'll just have to switch them really fast as you drive into a new area
think of it as a minigame
gofreak said:Although this is old news..
.. I'm seeing a lot of expressions of shock and mocking of the very idea, but..honestly, I'm not sure what's so unlikely about this scenario? It could well happen.
StRaNgE said:if it makes ya sleep better at night. i stopped caring as soon as they took the story line away from the mob and made it about petty street crime.
i always liked the fact it was mob related before.
soon as it became just some thug holding up 7/11's it ruined it for me.
(that's got nothing to do with gameplay though, just story)
Himuro said:I call bullshit. This will ruin the graphical finesse the next gen GTA's have. Start with an exclusive and work your way down and port. Don't make them all multiconsole at the same damn time. Ugh.
Wax Free Vanilla said:umm... :lol
Rockstar North are developing an exclusive GTA for PLAYSTATION 3.
Rockstar London are developing an exclusive GTA for Xbox 360
Dr_Cogent said:See, now you guys got him all paranoid.
Diablos said:The question is, will GTA carry on into the next gen as being the #1 game for basically all consoles, or will it be more like Final Fantasy where it was very popular and influential on the PSX, but didn't matter nearly as much for PS2?
Xellotah said:Just reply you have nothing to loose.
While at the same time some people assume that some franchises will forever stay exclusive to Xbox. I mean, some things will have to stay exclusive to make platforms more attractive. By your logic, it wouldn't make a shred of sense to have a single exclusive Xbox game from a 3rd party publisher, but that was far from the truth - and now we see some 3rd party exlclusive games on Xbox 360 too.Shinobi said:Some people just assume that certain franchises will stay exclusive with Sony for the rest of their lives.
...
Nothing about this would be surprising...Take Two is in business for themselves, not SCE. Simple logic dictates that they'll be better off releasing the game for both consoles at the same time.
Wyzdom said:It's almost a fact imo that GTA open nature render it's possibility endless. Now will their creaters put it that far? That's another question.
GTA is about freedom and interaction in a virtual world. The more our possibilities will widen, better the hardware, ressources etc, the better this game can get, at the very least theorically. See GTA a a primitive and omgwtf early matrix and you'll understand my point of view. And also, there's still a shitload of stuff (almost endless) that GTA can master in matter of free interactive world / sandbox game before even going online. (Not that i'd mind to have an online mode).
Oh and this goes for MMOs too since they are small worlds already.
SolidSnakex said:FF's not as influential because there's only been 1 this gen compared to 3 major FF's last gen.
Diablos said:My question is if GTA becomes completely irrelevant or close enough to that for PS3, will it hurt their sales? Can they carry on without last gen's key game series?
Marconelly said:While at the same time some people assume that some franchises will forever stay exclusive to Xbox. I mean, some things will have to stay exclusive to make platforms more attractive. By your logic, it wouldn't make a shred of sense to have a single exclusive Xbox game from a 3rd party publisher, but that was far from the truth - and now we see some 3rd party exlclusive games on Xbox 360 too.
Wyzdom said:It's almost a fact imo that GTA open nature render it's possibility endless. Now will their creaters put it that far? That's another question.
GTA is about freedom and interaction in a virtual world. The more our possibilities will widen, better the hardware, ressources etc, the better this game can get, at the very least theorically. See GTA a a primitive and omgwtf early matrix and you'll understand my point of view. And also, there's still a shitload of stuff (almost endless) that GTA can master in matter of free interactive world / sandbox game before even going online. (Not that i'd mind to have an online mode).
Oh and this goes for MMOs too since they are small worlds already.
Lets try not to get too excited, it's not even actual news.Cpl_Cain said:Great news, but I thought this was pretty much a given with Rockstar's financial situation being what it is.
But better! (ok, not really)DenogginizerOS said:Isn't Crackdown an X360 exclusive? From what I have read, this game has a lot of promise and has the same sandbox gameplay aften associated with GTA.
DenogginizerOS said:Isn't Crackdown an X360 exclusive? From what I have read, this game has a lot of promise and has the same sandbox gameplay aften associated with GTA.
Marconelly said:While at the same time some people assume that some franchises will forever stay exclusive to Xbox.
DenogginizerOS said:Isn't Crackdown an X360 exclusive? From what I have read, this game has a lot of promise and has the same sandbox gameplay aften associated with GTA.