• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Hands-On with PlayStation 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hajiki said:
What I get from this is that PS3 and X360 are same gen machines but that the PS3 has the edge, a few more polies and more effects simultanously then is possible on the 360.
So yeah it does state that PS3 is superio to X360, just not a generational leap like some people were claiming.
x360/ps3 both 90nm... dc/ps2 both 250nm... This time sony has a full feature state of the art gpu, unlike last time and we all saw how that went. The x360 was probably designed on a budget, and was probably designed as to take on a cell based s/w rendering crippled ps3(judging from some of the ati comments I recall, and things like the aniso issue that I'm commonly seeing.), my expectations are too see difference of a similar degree between these two new platforms.
xexex said:
my feeling is, PS3 will be capable of rivaling in realtime, the prerendered CG that we've seen in PS1 games of the mid to late 1990s, (re: old-ass CG) at better framerates (PSX FMV was like 20-25 fps) but definitally *NOT* on par with the CG demos we saw at E3 2005, or CG cutscenes from PS2 games.
The ffvii demo with fully animated clothes seemingly on all characters(yes even cloud's shirt, though it's a bit tough to notice, as are the individual eyebrow hairs and individual eyelashes.), obliterates the psone fmv, and runs at a solid 60fps on some of the earliest and weakest kits. In fact that demo delivers what I had expected a next-gen ff to look like, only it isn't it's a 2month demo on some of the weakest kits as compared to final.

Molina quality is said to be possible on ps3 s/w cutscenes, and that goes above and beyond pretty much every psone fmv character, and even above many of the low-mid budget ps2 titles' fmvs, especially those of the earlier titles.
 
What boggles my mind is how some folks act as though a two console power gap as never occurred.

We have two machines. Both have tons of support, enough to sustain a generation for fans of either. Both have tons of power, enough to assure hundreds of multiplatform releases.

It's a pretty boring scenario, actually. (unless you've never owned a console before)
 
Speevy said:
What boggles my mind is how some folks act as though a two console power gap as never occurred.

We have two machines. Both have tons of support, enough to sustain a generation for fans of either. Both have tons of power, enough to assure hundreds of multiplatform releases.

It's a pretty boring scenario, actually. (unless you've never owned a console before)
Dunno - you just decribed a situation that reminds me of the SNES vs. Genesis era, and that was pretty exciting for me. :) Honestly, I think that kind of competition is in the best interests of everyone.
 
So I just finished the article and I think I've deciphered the bottom line (according to them anyway) - I already have a PS3 in my living room, except it's white and called Xbox 360.
 
Does anyone really care if PS3 is only just a little bit better than X360, not twice as powerful? It's going to have great exclusive games, the graphics are going to rock, and it's going to be loaded with exciting new features. It's certainly going to make you not want to play your PS2 games again. Bring it on...more consoles = more games for me to enjoy.
 
Raven. said:
x360/ps3 both 90nm... dc/ps2 both 250nm... This time sony has a full feature state of the art gpu, unlike last time and we all saw how that went. The x360 was probably designed on a budget, and was probably designed as to take on a cell based s/w rendering crippled ps3(judging from some of the ati comments I recall, and things like the aniso issue that I'm commonly seeing.), my expectations are too see difference of a similar degree between these two new platforms.

The ffvii demo with fully animated clothes seemingly on all characters(yes even cloud's shirt, though it's a bit tough to notice, as are the individual eyebrow hairs and individual eyelashes.), obliterates the psone fmv, and runs at a solid 60fps on some of the earliest and weakest kits. In fact that demo delivers what I had expected a next-gen ff to look like, only it isn't it's a 2month demo on some of the weakest kits as compared to final.

Molina quality is said to be possible on ps3 s/w cutscenes, and that goes above and beyond pretty much every psone fmv character, and even above many of the low-mid budget ps2 titles' fmvs, especially those of the earlier titles.


well i was thinking more like, in game PS3, not techdemo PS3.
 
Animal said:
Like a breath of cold crisp fresh air.

Best Article I've read through GAF so far this year.

Either you don't read very much or you don't spend much time on GAF. That article doesn't deserve the inane 5 page thread it has managed to stir up... but then again, it is GAF and KK has left most us a little technosexually frustrated.
 
erikevrhrd said:
Does anyone really care if PS3 is only just a little bit better than X360, not twice as powerful? It's going to have great exclusive games, the graphics are going to rock, and it's going to be loaded with exciting new features. It's certainly going to make you not want to play your PS2 games again. Bring it on...more consoles = more games for me to enjoy.

The 150M+ consumers who are going to pick it up don't care, no.

XBox fans do though :D
 
erikevrhrd said:
Does anyone really care if PS3 is only just a little bit better than X360, not twice as powerful? It's going to have great exclusive games, the graphics are going to rock, and it's going to be loaded with exciting new features. It's certainly going to make you not want to play your PS2 games again. Bring it on...more consoles = more games for me to enjoy.


Mere enthusiasm is not sufficient. I'm sorry, but your fanship ends now.

*shoots erikevrhrd in the head*
 
Its not like they are the first to say that both are similar in power. Just another group of people with first hand experience to add to the list. It must take alot of faith to still believe PS3 will be a massive leap.
 
MassiveAttack said:
Either you don't read very much or you don't spend much time on GAF. That article doesn't deserve the inane 5 page thread it has managed to stir up... but then again, it is GAF and KK has left most us a little technosexually frustrated.

Wrong and Wrong. I completely dissagree. Correct.

This article is completely and utterlly honnest in its information from what I can discern. Unlike most of the garbage that is being passed around this forum. In the end its the results and not the methods used to get them. This article has the objectivity I wish more people on GAF had instead of throwing up a bunch of technical garbage that most wouldn't even understand inlcuding the ones posting them.

The conclusion of this article is exactly what I have been expecting from the PS3.
 
The ones I expect quality at launch is not some third-party but first-party devs, and from what these devs are saying in the interview they are unlikely to be first-party devs. As seen at the last TGS/E3 we've known there are PS3 games such as Sonic/Fifth Phantom Saga/killing Day which are not shooting high and things designed with a modest goal can't be improved except for adding additional filters/AA etc which don't contribute to differentiating them from PC-ish graphics they originated from. Anyway, Kikizo should have clarified at least the title is an exclusive to PS3 or not.
 
TheDuce22 said:
Its not like they are the first to say that both are similar in power. Just another group of people with first hand experience to add to the list. It must take alot of faith to still believe PS3 will be a massive leap.

Unfortunately, and until proven otherwise, there is no proof of this "first hand experience". Literally everything in the article can be culled directly from GAF, Beyond3D, and a few traditionally erudite Edge articles.
 
TheDuce22 said:
Its not like they are the first to say that both are similar in power. Just another group of people with first hand experience to add to the list. It must take alot of faith to still believe PS3 will be a massive leap.
Slightly better graphically, can do more stuff at once, with the distance widening over time.

Xbox fans - "if I don't see it, its not real"

Since when has the 360 being slightly weaker than PS3 being seen as a positive by 360 fans anyway, tunes have sure changed since pre-launch.
 
Just throwing it out there...but I have a feeling Kikizo met with Sega and got a look into Sega games (for the PS3) and 5th Phantom Saga specifically (simply because of their relationship with Sega, which is a good relationship). With that said, you can see that their basing alot of what their seeing off of 5th Phantom Saga and can't really vouch for any other game (due to restraints or possibly not even seeing games by other developers other than Sega).

It seems as though they saw a bunch of Sega games being developed and applied the impressions they got from those games and applied it to every other game being developed on the PS3. As if Sega is the high bar for development prowess for the PS3.
 
MassiveAttack said:
Unfortunately, and until proven otherwise, there is no proof of this "first hand experience". Literally everything in the article can be culled directly from GAF, Beyond3D, and a few traditionally erudite Edge articles.

If an opportunity arises, perhaps a reporter can ask someone from Sony to comment on the article. I am sure they won't. And that is a part of the problem. Sony isn't saying anything.
 
Striek said:
Slightly better graphically, can do more stuff at once, with the distance widening over time.

Xbox fans - "if I don't see it, its not real"

Since when has the 360 being slightly weaker than PS3 being seen as a positive by 360 fans anyway, tunes have sure changed since pre-launch.

since when has it been absolutely guaranteed to be ps3 over 360? Never.

It's not a guarantee, and something that may never even be proven for that matter
 
Striek said:
Slightly better graphically, can do more stuff at once, with the distance widening over time.

Sony fans- "if I don't see it, it must be real"

Since when has the 360 being slightly weaker than PS3 being seen as a positive by 360 fans anyway, tunes have sure changed since pre-launch.

Seeing that the PS2 is weaker than the XBOX hardware-wise, I guess an XBOT may see the X360 as the next PS2 if it can deliver great games like the PS2 did.
 
So they saw 3 games on some version of PS3 devkits and by way of the games they used to compare and contrast these anonymous games against, we know they didn't see any of the following:

MGS4
Warhawk
Motorstorm
Killzone
Killing Day
5th Phantom Saga
Sonic
GTA

That's about the most insightful thing I could gather from this article. I was disappointed not to see anything that addressed what Sony might have been telling these developers about flash/hdd storage (how are they doing game saves), networking, etc.
 
good god, I go to play the horrible short Black demo and this thread is over 5 pages now :lol
I feel pitty for you guys :(
 
Striek said:
Xbox fans - "if I don't see it, its not real"


Pertaining to games, that's absolutely true.

Since when has the 360 being slightly weaker than PS3 being seen as a positive by 360 fans anyway, tunes have sure changed since pre-launch.


The graphics difference between these two machines has virtually no impact on the types of exclusive games these machines are likely to get, or the gigantic number of multiplatform releases coming to both.
 
DopeyFish said:
since when has it been absolutely guaranteed to be ps3 over 360? Never.

It's not a guarantee, and something that may never even be proven for that matter
Huh? I see Xbox fans rejoicing at this article all over the internet. Besides, its practically 100% of developers and/or hints in PS3s favour now. We have to be realistic at some point. Much like the generation leap that isn't happening.

DenogginizerOS said:
Seeing that the PS2 is weaker than the XBOX hardware-wise, I guess an XBOT may see the X360 as the next PS2 if it can deliver great games like the PS2 did.
PS2 had the games. Looking at the lists, PS3 has the games. I can't believe you're trying to use this argument that X360 being weaker...eh. Hey the DC was weaker, came out before the PS2...lets use that analogy. No? Good.

- And way to ignore the first part of my statement.

Speevy said:
The graphics difference between these two machines has virtually no impact on the types of exclusive games these machines are likely to get, or the gigantic number of multiplatform releases coming to both.
Oh of course, only specific devs like Factor5 will be influenced by power, but internet braggin rights man! :(
Actually its just fun to watch the ebb-and-flow of opinions. Can you believe that opinions have shifted that dramatically in just 3 or so months, and more importantly, there was 0 PS3 media/news. Its interesting.
 
erikevrhrd said:
Does anyone really care if PS3 is only just a little bit better than X360, not twice as powerful? It's going to have great exclusive games, the graphics are going to rock, and it's going to be loaded with exciting new features. It's certainly going to make you not want to play your PS2 games again. Bring it on...more consoles = more games for me to enjoy.

lol, i'm sure a lot of Sony fans are waiting for payback, where they can go into every Xbox 360 thread and say stuff like,"Geez I hope this comes to the PS3. I can only imagine how this would look on the more powerful PS3." "PS3, superior version for the win." "Why do we constantly have games being built with the weaker Xbox360 as a base for multiplatform? Xbox 360 is limiting the graphics."
 
Striek said:
Huh? I see Xbox fans rejoicing at this article all over the internet. Besides, its practically 100% of developers and/or hints in PS3s favour now. We have to be realistic at some point. Much like the generation leap that isn't happening.

No, it's far from 100%. Very far.

And as for your generational leap... just you wait. You're going to be absolutely -floored- by what PS3 and 360 can do.

They should have some more fleshed out projects at E3, and I can't wait.
 
BlueTsunami said:
Just throwing it out there...but I have a feeling Kikizo met with Sega and got a look into Sega games (for the PS3) and 5th Phantom Saga specifically (simply because of their relationship with Sega, which is a good relationship).
Agrees, and probably Sonic too.
Particularly from a first-person or camera-only explorative view, everything from looking at natural, detailed, muddy floor to being in the shade of a tree, feels a bit closer to the being-there experience gamers dream of. A peaceful early morning sunlight scatters through leaves and floods over the darkened branches, softly rendered shadow traces all the way down to a canvas where grains of earth are visible, while dynamic range lets our eyes see it all in accurate contrast together
 
Striek said:
PS2 had the games. Looking at the lists, PS3 has the games. I can't believe you're trying to use this argument that X360 being weaker...eh. Hey the DC was weaker, came out before the PS2...lets use that analogy. No? Good.

- And way to ignore the first part of my statement.

Lists? What lists? Sony hasn't confirmed shit. But at least you are acknowledging that the games matter more than the power of the hardware. Weaker/stronger means nothing if you enjoy playing the game. When both systems are available in the marketplace and games are on shelves to play, then we can start making claims about who has the better hardware and software. Until then, "Killzone will be a Halo killer" faith is a bit premature.
 
ThirdEye said:
Agrees, and probably Sonic too.

I'm seriously thinking that Kikizo met with Sega and only saw Sega games now. Not sure, just a hunch, but from what they explain in the article and all the references to 5th Phantom Saga...this seems to be the most likely case....
 
BlueTsunami said:
I'm seriously thinking that Kikizo met with Sega and only saw Sega games now. Not sure, just a hunch, but from what they explain in the article and all the references to 5th Phantom Saga...this seems to be the most likely case....

I'm starting to believe that they only met during some kind of web conference and there must have been some kind of compression that made everything look bad too. In fact, I'm now (just now) convinced myself that they never even saw anything of value.
 
3rdman said:
I'm starting to believe that they only met during some kind of web conference and there must have been some kind of compression that made everything look bad too. In fact, I'm now (just now) convinced myself that they never even saw anything of value.

Hurrrrrrrrrrrr
 
kaching said:
So they saw 3 games on some version of PS3 devkits and by way of the games they used to compare and contrast these anonymous games against, we know they didn't see any of the following:

MGS4
Warhawk
Motorstorm
Killzone
Killing Day
5th Phantom Saga
Sonic
GTA

That's about the most insightful thing I could gather from this article. I was disappointed not to see anything that addressed what Sony might have been telling these developers about flash/hdd storage (how are they doing game saves), networking, etc.

Yeah, this is true. Basically they are comparing unfinished games by an unnamed developer to the best of XBox 360's complete games and inferring that 'the ps3 is only marginally more powerful than XBox 360.' I want to see the graphics on a launch game by a company such as Namco. That should be grounds for a more reasonable comparison.

I don't believe that the PS3 is a whole generational leap ahead of the XBox 360 and makes its games look like utter trash, but I do believe that the difference in graphics will be noticeable, even from the jump. That's not to say that the Xbox360 won't have beautiful games, just as the PS2 continues to put out beautiful games late in its life cycle.

I doubt the two systems are very very close where as the difference is almost negligible as Kikizo seems to want us to believe, but it isn't going to absolutely blow the Xbox 360 out the water as Sony wants us to believe. As has often been the case, the truth often lies in the middle.

But really, Sony better release some information on PS3 soon, because the longer they let this go on, the more the mainstream's opinion will deteriorate on the system's perceived power.
 
xexex said:
well i was thinking more like, in game PS3, not techdemo PS3.
techdemo on substantially weaker h/w, at 60fps, the clothing animation is probably physics based too, which would bring it closer to an ingame scenario. I honestly don't see how it could possibly end up looking worse on final hw, but it is true ingame demonstrations are already past due. As for another close to ingame demo, we could also mention the gt cars, which while not ingame are certainly car models that will be used in game at 60fps, and have been mistaken for cg.

If you want closer to ingame accounts there's those of heavenly sword behind close doors, a demo that held it's own while being presented along the likes of motorstorm and killzone. Some even choose it as most impressive (others killzone and yet others choose motorstorm) amongst this triumvirate which eclipses all other s/w shown, out or upcoming, for any platform.

Here's a quote someone provided earlier in this thread:
Laa-Yosh said:
With that said, I think you shouldn't write off nextgen so soon. The word is that Heavenly Sword looks quite a lot better than both the E3 stuff and what's on the Team Ninja website - and that it plays nextgen, too... ;)



TheDuce22 said:
Its not like they are the first to say that both are similar in power. Just another group of people with first hand experience to add to the list. It must take alot of faith to still believe PS3 will be a massive leap.

Some consider the demos seen to already be delivering on that gap. The only doubt remaining is that some expect a downgrade on the gphx seen while ingame. Honestly I don't see how something like say mgs4 could look worse on final h/w, considering it's said to even be using recycled ps2 assets. Especially when hearing Laa-Yosh hinting that one of the most impressive of all the ps3 demos(said to've been showing the ingame engine even), appears to've even gone beyond what was shown, a demo that blew the world away.
 
So this pretty much falls in line with the PS3 IGN Podcast from a couple of weeks ago. No real discernable difference between the graphics of the two systems, but the PS3 CPU will be a little more powerful.
 
DopeyFish said:
No, it's far from 100%. Very far.
Not publically, and especially not from unbiased sources. The only non-MS 360-advocate I know, surprisingly, is that fired Sony guy.

DopeyFish said:
And as for your generational leap... just you wait. You're going to be absolutely -floored- by what PS3 and 360 can do.

They should have some more fleshed out projects at E3, and I can't wait.
Oh for sure.
Oh I can see the generational leap from >insert game< title to Gears, MGS4 etc. I meant there is no gen.leap from 360 > PS3.

DenogginizerOS said:
Lists? What lists? Sony hasn't confirmed shit.
There are more confirmed PS3 games than X360 though ;)
But yeah, its all about the games, but obviously most people care about power for some inane reason. We like classifying things I guess. At the end of the day its not going to stop anyone buying a 360 or PS3 though. Rev otoh....
 
I wonder how much it will cost to make the slightly more powerful PS3 in relation to the X360 and if that slight power difference is going to cost consumers at the checkout line when they buy the PS3? If I were buying Madden 2007 and owned an X360, I would not spend more money to buy the PS3 if it is not graphically better.
 
It seems like the Sony Bots are in full patrol mode tonight. :lol

This is article was really a waste of time. Sony just needs to get on the ball on release the PS3 already so I can watch my Blu Ray movies. :D I sincerely hope they don't screw up the controller though.
 
maximum360 said:
It seems like the Sony Bots are in full patrol mode tonight. :lol

Really? I'd swear every 4 posts have just been DenogginizerOS trying keenly to put down the PS3 while sounding objective and asking a million questions he knows can't be answered. :P
 
Bebpo said:
Really? I'd swear every 4 posts have just been DenogginizerOS trying keenly to put down the PS3 while sounding objective and asking a million questions he knows can't be answered. :P

:lol

But that's why we like him.
 
Bebpo said:
Really? I'd swear every 4 posts have just been DenogginizerOS trying keenly to put down the PS3 while sounding objective and asking a million questions he knows can't be answered. :P


Its all about trying to have the house of cards fall without the impression you were the one who did it :)
 
Bebpo said:
Really? I'd swear every 4 posts have just been DenogginizerOS trying keenly to put down the PS3 while sounding objective and asking a million questions he knows can't be answered. :P

Actually, it is 25/244 which is close to 1:10. And I am keenly trying to get someone who knows something concrete about Sony/from Sony to spill some goddamn information.
 
I don't trust this article it seems to bash more however I do realise that he mentions more physics and realism simultaneously compared to xbox360 and the best part is the hair animation, doesn't sounds to impressive on paper but its about fucking time to get to the details..... :)

But throughout the article I was sort of convinced that this guy is bashing the PS3, he compared the movies at E3 to the stuff he played... I mean we all saw the Madden video and then got Madden on 360.....


I think if he mentions those details here and there it basically depends on the developer how to use the console to develope his game.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom