• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Hands-On with PlayStation 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Slaaaaabs said:
Kikizo = Danish cartoonist
Hands On article = Cartoon of Mohammed wearing a bomb
Sony Fanboys = Muslim fanatics

Who said gamers aren't in touch with reality? :)

er...no, just no. I think this is pretty inappropriate
 
All the people with knowledge and a little of inteligence knew that the PS3 is going to be a console with the same level of 360 in graphical level.

I don´t understand the cry of some people, I cannot understand it. If my cousin that has no idea of videogames comes to me an says all the marketing bullshit from any of the 3 companies I can accept it becuase she has no idea how the videogame world runs, but people of GAF has believed all the Sony marketing crap and this make me very sad.
 
monkeymagic said:
It sounds like the leap between Dreamcast and XBox.


This is kind of funny, but everytime I read one of your posts, you sound like you're Sony's Rush Limbaugh. It's like you only listen to half of what anybody says, and when you respond, you don't seem to understand the technical details you argue one bit. :) a 6 month gap between two systems with chips by rival PC graphics vendors is suddenly akin to the 4 year tech gap between the Dreamcast and Xbox? Aren't you afraid you're gonna pull a hamstring or something with that kind of stretching?
 
SolidSnakex said:
They said 1 of them was. But i'd prefer to know whether or not the games they were playing were exclusive or some multiplatform games. That'd make a big difference.

But you know,the concept of high profile is absolutely relative.
I mean, Ea would be considered a top developer by many people.But of course we know that games conceived for multiplatform development like theirs aren't good to make comparisons.
 
Elios83 said:
But you know,the concept of high profile is absolutely relative.
I mean, Ea would be considered a top developer by many people.But of course we know that games conceived for multiplatform development like theirs aren't good to make comparisons.

I could agree with this if it wasn't for some of the best looking next gen title being developed by EA
 
hadareud said:
I could agree with this if it wasn't for some of the best looking next gen title being developed by EA

How long will that last though?

The first year of consoles just aren't a yardstick to measure the full capabilities of any console and the debate is ridiculous. Take any console in history and their launch games and near end of life games and compare them. In most cases you will see huge leaps in difference. In the 360's case I feel the launch games were extremely rushed out and suffered for it. Games like Oblivion, GRAW and Gears of War I would consider more like true "launch" games if the 360 hadn't been rushed out the door.

Given another two years I think we should be seeing some amazing stuff from both consoles That's one reason to take this article with a grain of salt. I really don't think we can pull any hard facts or judgement calls on the true power of a console from whatever limited time was spent with a development kit of a launch game.

More then ever I think this gen will come down to the games on the system and not hardware.
 
iven that Kojima said that MGS4 could be done on the 360, I have to say that I'm a little disappointed in Next Gen.

so ... lets get this right...

now that it looks like 360 and PS3 is around the same, and that adds more weight to what Kojima said about MGS4 , then the NExt gen is disappointed?!

MGS4 wasn`t impressive????

(note : this article is at odds with what people i trust are saying, so...)
 
DCharlie said:
so ... lets get this right...

now that it looks like 360 and PS3 is around the same, and that adds more weight to what Kojima said about MGS4 , then the NExt gen is disappointed?!

MGS4 wasn`t impressive????

(note : this article is at odds with what people i trust are saying, so...)

Fully agreed. What are they saying D?
 
Im not quite sure how anyone could actually say that they are disappointed with next gen after seeing MGS4. No other game has ever looked so fucking incedible, what the hell are people expecting if they think MGS4 is not impressive.
 
CR0N0S said:
a 6 month gap between two systems with chips by rival PC graphics vendors is suddenly akin to the 4 year tech gap between the Dreamcast and Xbox?

The GPUs are only a subset of each of these closed system architectures but I guess that's the only comparison that will work towards your agenda.

Let's forget CELL which eclipses XeCPU for gaming applications in every which way possible.
 
DCharlie said:
now that it looks like 360 and PS3 is around the same,
The article did not give me that impression, it just said it isnt double as powerful or a generation ahead. But it sounded a good amount more powerful and maybe when all the power is used quite more powerful.

Only time will tell, but that was the impression I got from the article, which is about what I had expected.
 
The idea of DC doing Sony damage control is hilarious enough to end this thread on a high note. It could only be down hill from here on :P
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom