Hulu greenlights its first original series - Battleground, a political piece

Status
Not open for further replies.

ivysaur12

Banned
Trailer is here.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/entertainmentnewsbuzz/2012/01/hulu-introduces-battleground-first-original-scripted-show.html

Online video service Hulu's ambition to become a destination for high-quality, original, scripted shows begins with -- and not on -- a "Battleground."

Hulu executives and show producers on Sunday unveiled Hulu's small programming slate, which consists of three productions, including the politically themed "Battleground," during the Television Critics Assn. press tour in Pasadena.

Networks have long used the nearly two-week gathering of journalists to promote their upcoming series. It was Hulu's first appearance at the press tour, and was particularly noteworthy because it marked the first time an online distribution platform participated in the event traditionally reserved for such TV industry heavyweights as ABC, CBS, NBC, HBO, Showtime and Fox.

"We've long asked the question, how come the creativity and vibrancy that exists in the indie film world doesn't exist in TV?" Andy Forssell, Hulu's senior vice president of content, said in an interview. He said Hulu executives concluded that the reason was television's structural barriers, including the mandate that shows immediately produce sizable ratings.

"For us, we don't need a show to take off in the first, second or third episode," Forssell said.

Hulu's first effort in scripted TV programming, "Battleground," debuts Feb. 14. It is directed by actor J.D. Walsh ("Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip") and produced by Hagai Shaham ("The Details") and Marc Webb ("The Amazing Spider-Man" and "(500) Days of Summer").

The 13-episode series is timely, coming in the midst of the Republican primary season. The show, which employs the "faux documentary style" of storytelling, follows a rowdy group of campaign workers who labor to advance the chances of a third-place candidate in the battleground state of Wisconsin.

Fox television originally bought the script but passed on making the show.

"We saw a spark there," Forssell said. "We think the show has the potential to be something that people say: 'This is one of the best things I've seen in the last couple of weeks.' "

Hulu also plans a second season for Morgan Spurlock's "A Day in the Life," a series that debuted last year. In its first season, the show followed such luminaries as music producer and Black Eyed Peas member will.i.am and British entrepreneur Sir Richard Branson.

In the second season of "A Day in the Life," Spurlock ("Super Size Me" and "The Greatest Movie Ever Sold") and producing partner Jeremy Chilnick plan to capture the daily routines of actor Joel McHale ("Community") and UFC fighter Jason "Mayhem" Miller, among others.

The third original show is "Up to Speed," which comes from filmmaker Richard Linklater ("Dazed and Confused" and "School of Rock.") Linklater has committed to directing six episodes of the show, which Hulu said is designed to discover "historic nooks and crannies of notable destinations."

Although Hulu is developing more original productions, it has no plans to compete with the broadcast networks, Forssell said. (After all, Hulu is owned by broadcast-network owners Walt Disney Co., NBCUniversal and News Corp.).

"The core of the Hulu business is working with the big studios and the big networks and that hasn't changed," Forssell said.

This is even more interesting than with Netflix, because Hulu is ad-supported (and also subscription supported) for revenue.

And for those of you keeping track at home:

Lilyhammer (drama) - Netflix/Norwegian co-production
House of Cards (drama/Sony TV) - Netflix
Orange Is The New Black (comedy/Lionsgate) - Netflix
Arrested Development (drama/20th Century) - Netflix
Battleground (drama) - Hulu

Let's see where iTunes, YahooTV, and Amazon Prime take this. Welcome to the future of serialized media.
 
And for those of you keeping track at home:

Lilyhammer (drama) - Netflix/Norwegian co-production
House of Cards (drama/Sony TV) - Netflix
Orange Is The New Black (comedy/Lionsgate) - Netflix
Battleground (drama) - Hulu

You forgot Arrested Development.
 
Really interested to see how much further Netflix and Hulu will proceed along this path.

Far, at least with Netflix. I also wouldn't be surprised if Sony, UMS, and Hulu came up with a plan for Community and Hulu in the future.

The more lucrative streaming becomes, the more revenues will come from online viewing. This is just the start of a huge new wave in the ways that content is delivered.
 
Let's see where iTunes, YahooTV, and Amazon Prime take this. Welcome to the future of serialized media.
I believe this is relevant to your interests. Obviously it's not any sort of confirmation or anything, but pretty interesting to hear from someone in McRae's position.


Vizio CTO Matt McRae: Internet-based TV provider with 50-100 channels coming within 18 months

I sat down with Vizio CTO Matt McRae yesterday to talk over the company's huge number of CES announcements, from its CinemaWide 21:9 TVs to the $99 VAP430 Google TV media streamer to its entirely new lineup of laptop and desktop PCs. We also talked a lot about smart TV and the challenges of integrating live television with internet content, and Matt said something particularly interesting — he believes that a full internet TV provider that offers 50-100 channels to consumers will launch within 12-18 months. That's a bold prediction from the CTO of the number one US TV manufacturer, but it's also exciting: Matt says internet delivery will enable all kinds of new search and discovery methods and synchronized TV / PC / tablet viewing experiences. Unfortunately he wouldn't say who would be behind this new service, but at least there's hope.
 
I believe this is relevant to your interests. Obviously it's not any sort of confirmation or anything, but pretty interesting to hear from someone in McRae's position.


Vizio CTO Matt McRae: Internet-based TV provider with 50-100 channels coming within 18 months

We're at the crest of a revolution in the ways that we get "television." Serials might even be the better word at some point.

We'll still have live-TV, but internet is going to be more and more integrated with the ways in which television is delivered and revenues are collected. Hulu is the most interesting to me because it's half ad-supported.

I'm also interested if the CW can find away to really push for demographic tracking in online views. Its revenues would skyrocket.
 
There was an article in the last New Yorker about how Youtube is ready to roll out a whole bunch of channels with TV-quality programming. Will be interesting to see where this goes...

Edit: There it is
 
So they fixed the issue of some shows being on regular Hulu but others not on Hulu plus? That is news to me and might make me consider subscribing then.

I have no idea, I only use my dad's Hulu plus account and haven't really explored it very thoroughly.

I am excited to see where this internet provided content leads us.

Yup, this is the future. I almost hope that NBC cancels Community and then Hulu picks it up and runs with it for more than a season. I really want to see ad and subscription supported online serials find a viable platform.

I hope that Netflix and Hulu start branding them as "xxx originals" and make them easier to find. Right now, they would just get lost in the shuffle.
 
I have no idea, I only use my dad's Hulu plus account and haven't really explored it very thoroughly.

I dont remember which shows there are, but some are not authorized to work on anything but a computer. So some have episodes on regular Hulu, but due to contract stuff they are not on Hulu Plus since that is on mobile devices and TVs. I am trying to look into what shows they were, but it was annoying and made me not subscribe. Of course, now that I am on a smartphone and both my wife and I have tablets, I might subscribe.


Yup, this is the future. I almost hope that NBC cancels Community and then Hulu picks it up and runs with it for more than a season. I really want to see ad and subscription supported online serials find a viable platform.

I hope that Netflix and Hulu start branding them as "xxx originals" and make them easier to find. Right now, they would just get lost in the shuffle.

Oh, they will. You don't spend all that money to produce and secure exclusivity just to throw it in a pile. They will advertise the shit out of it.
 
Just more episodes/seasons and quicker access to Fox, CW, and (soon) ABC shows.
I'm confused.

Are you saying Hulu Plus has more ... or Hulu?





When Hulu Plus first launched, and for quite a while after, it was actually missing content from Hulu. I'm asking if that's still the case.
 
So they fixed the issue of some shows being on regular Hulu but others not on Hulu plus? That is news to me and might make me consider subscribing then.

I don't think there was ever a difference between Hulu and +, some of the content can't be shown outside of the website, if that's what you mean then no, it hasn't changed.
 
I'm confused.

Are you saying Hulu Plus has more ... or Hulu?





When Hulu Plus first launched, and for quite a while after, it was actually missing content from Hulu. I'm asking if that's still the case.

Sorry, I thought you say offer anything that you couldn't find on normal Hulu. I think this:

I don't think there was ever a difference between Hulu and +, some of the content can't be shown outside of the website, if that's what you mean then no, it hasn't changed.

Is what's up. There is some content that's web-exclusive and that's up to the production companies and distributors.
 
I don't think there was ever a difference between Hulu and +, some of the content can't be shown outside of the website, if that's what you mean then no, it hasn't changed.

Which is the problem. Why would someone pay for a subscription when some of the content isn't available?





So basically, just make sure your show is on Hulu+ before paying for it. Hopefully it all gets resolved soon.
If it hasn't yet ...



What's worse though, there were examples of shows that were on Hulu+ ... but missing random episodes :\
 
Which is the problem. Why would someone pay for a subscription when some of the content isn't available?

Exactly. However, some content is only available through the paid service. And it is the only way to get the content on your TV (without an HTPC or other workarounds) or on mobile devices (without workarounds)
 
Exactly. However, some content is only available through the paid service. And it is the only way to get the content on your TV (without an HTPC or other workarounds) or on mobile devices (without workarounds)

I realize that ... I'm just saying the situation sours me on the entire thing ... and makes me not want to purchase it.

It's absolutely ridiculous they haven't gotten this resolved yet.
 
Exactly. However, some content is only available through the paid service. And it is the only way to get the content on your TV (without an HTPC or other workarounds) or on mobile devices (without workarounds)

That's because of the ongoing conversation between production companies and distributors. The real issue is that web syndication hasn't been a model that's ever really been viable up until now. Hulu wants its content everywhere, the problem is that there are significant contract negotiations that are basically breaking new ground since there's no model to emulate.

And then it's, well, what about a show distributed by ABC but produced by Warner Bros (Suburgatory, The Middle)? That's gonna be different than even a Fox shows produced by Warner Bros (Fringe, Alcatraz). Well, how does that ABC deal with Warner Bros. compare to a deal with Sony (Pan Am)? And what about shows that are co-produced by ABC and Sony (Happy Endings)? And then Warner Bros. and Sony (generally) have issues with web syndication because they're independent and only get significant revenue from syndication.
 
I realize that ... I'm just saying the situation sours me on the entire thing ... and makes me not want to purchase it.

It's absolutely ridiculous they haven't gotten this resolved yet.

I completely agree with you. If they could just get everything that is on the website working on Hulu+, I would jump in with no hesitation and not complain about paying for the service. As it is, I only used the free offers to try it on mobile devices when it first launched.


That's because of the ongoing conversation between production companies and distributors. The real issue is that web syndication hasn't been a model that's ever really been viable up until now. Hulu wants its content everywhere, the problem is that there are contract negotiations.

And then it's, well, what about a show distributed by ABC but produced by Warner Bros (Suburgatory, The Middle)? That's gonna be different than even a Fox shows produced by Warner Bros (Fringe, Alcatraz). And then Warner Bros. (generally) has issues with web syndication because it's independent and only gets significant revenue from syndication.

I know how it all works, but that doesnt make it any less annoying. So many hands in the cookie jar and no one will agree on anything. And who knows what it would take to get CBS on this thing. They said they wouldnt go unless it was a paid service, and they still wont.

I do hope programming like this is one of the things Apple tries to force with their rumored television.
 
I completely agree with you. If they could just get everything that is on the website working on Hulu+, I would jump in with no hesitation and not complain about paying for the service. As it is, I only used the free offers to try it on mobile devices when it first launched.




I know how it all works, but that doesnt make it any less annoying. So many hands in the cookie jar and no one will agree on anything. And who knows what it would take to get CBS on this thing. They said they wouldnt go unless it was a paid service, and they still wont.

I do hope programming like this is one of the things Apple tries to force with their rumored television.

I mean, they're making strides. ABC and Warner Bros now have a deal that will be used as a template for every other web syndication deal with independent and off-network production companies. I suspect that it will all be dealt with within the next year because web syndication is become more and more profitable by the month. Hulu itself is already a more viable platform for content than it was a year ago. I also suspect that the big issues is that CBS wants their content only to be on Hulu+. But hey, the CW is now on Hulu (which is more out of a need to turn a profit).

And yeah, I expect that Apple will join the fray sooner rather than later.
 
Yup, this is the future. I almost hope that NBC cancels Community and then Hulu picks it up and runs with it for more than a season. I really want to see ad and subscription supported online serials find a viable platform.

You're assuming ad revenue from online is enough to cover the budget of a show like Community.
 
Which is the problem. Why would someone pay for a subscription when some of the content isn't available?
I mainly use Hulu on the website with my laptop.

edit-To be more clear, I pay for the content(or at least did when I was a subscriber), not the ability to stream.
 
Which is the problem. Why would someone pay for a subscription when some of the content isn't available?





\

This is why I canceled hulu plus.

Oh you won't let me use my 360 to stream it with ads (paid with ads is already bullshit) but you'll let me use my PC on my tv if I take 20 seconds to move my pc hdmi cable to my tv? Fuck off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom