Gantz said:Is it still a taboo to show interracial characters such as lead characters, couples, or families on television on movies? You just don't see them on TV(maybe for the exception of PBS) or movies. Why is that? Are people afraid interacial couples will tear the fabric of society?
Mama Smurf said:Eastenders has had plenty of interracial couples. And that's one of the biggest two shows in the UK.
Oh, you probably meant in Jesusland.
Matlock said:What about The Rock? Huh?
Mama Smurf said:Gunn and Fred in Angel, Buffy/Faith and the Principal in Buffy, Wash and Zoe in Firefly.
Bored now.
Days like these... said:I thought the Rock was native american not interracial?
DJ Sl4m said:Perhaps because the majority of couples are not interacially dating, and it's a representation similar to the real life ratio of these types of couples ?
XS+ said:How does a backwater yokel like you know what the racial composition of the "majority of couples" is?
DJ Sl4m said:Take your racial hate glasses off and you'll see interacial dating isn't over 50% of the couples.
XS+ said:Racial hate? Again, how do you KNOW? Sorry, but I can only take with a grain of salt social reflections imparted by he who would weigh in on race from an insulated pocket of the South. Your post history doesn't lend itself to your opinion on this matter being taken seriously. No offense.
XS+ said:Racial hate? Again, how do you KNOW? Sorry, but I can only take with a grain of salt social reflections imparted by he who would weigh in on race from an insulated pocket of the South. Your post history doesn't lend itself to your opinion on this matter being taken seriously. No offense.
BobbyRobby said:Jeez, The guy is right. A majority of couples are not interracial. Is it impossible to think that the media just tends to reflect a majority of the population? There is not any underlying scheme to suppress other races by not showing interracical couples on TV.
Cynical liberals like yourself, looking for insignificant crap to get outraged about, give liberals a bad name.
BTW, I'm from New Jersey, minutes from NYC, does my opinion matter?
mrmyth said:"I'd like to test that theory."
Now find me a non-Joss Whedon show.
Well, I don't see you presenting any empirical evidence either. You are falling into the EXACT SAME FALLACY that you're (correctly) accusing him of: mistaking one's personal experience for a general truth. It is just as reasonable for HIM to ask YOU to assume the burden of proof.XS+ said:Like him, you're making a broad statement that is not empirically tenable. While at college, I saw more interracial couplings than homogenous pairings. As far as I'm concerned, until you can prove otherwise, interracial relationships occur as frequently as mono-racial unions.
Source?Socreges said:Interracial dating, particularly between black/white people, is very much a minority. That's not personal experience. That's fact.
-jinx- said:My girlfriend is a mix of Chinese and Dutch.
Oy vey-jinx- said:Source?
I just got done bitching at XS+ about this...you're on the hook as well if you want to make statements like that.
I figured you were probably being sarcastic. Still, the problem is that most people throw words like "race" around without thinking about what those terms MEAN. Also, without some kind of data, how do you know that your "commonsense notion" about interracial dating is, in fact, correct?Socreges said:Oy vey
I gave you "There, I said it" to indicate that I'm aware that it was a preposterous statement to suggest that it is "fact". It's just testimony.
But, for what it's worth, in all likelihood the testimony of 99% of everyone. If you want to argue that it's just as reasonable to suggest that interracial dating is NOT a minority than of it being a minority, then you do that. I'll just sit here and scoff.
Oh oh, I should mention: I'm talking about two distinct races dating each other, due to the fact that pretty much anyone of mixed heritage is going to be "interracial dating" no matter who they're with.
No, no, no. I just conceded that it was not "in fact, correct". But I've got my particular thoughts on this and I'm just going to shake my head at anyone who suggests otherwise. Leave me to that.-jinx- said:I figured you were probably being sarcastic. Still, the problem is that most people throw words like "race" around without thinking about what those terms MEAN. Also, without some kind of data, how do you know that your "commonsense notion" about interracial dating is, in fact, correct?
I examine it just fine, thanks.The unexamined life isn't worth living, etc.
-jinx- said:OK, everyone take a deep breath and count to 20. Feel better?
To the original poster: The question is ill-formed. Do you mean that television, movies, etc. do not portray interracial dating or marriages, or do you mean that they do not portray characters of mixed racial backgrounds? I suspect that you mean the former, but "interracial characters" can be construed as the latter.
-jinx- said:OK, everyone take a deep breath and count to 20. Feel better?
Well, I don't see you presenting any empirical evidence either. You are falling into the EXACT SAME FALLACY that you're (correctly) accusing him of: mistaking one's personal experience for a general truth. It is just as reasonable for HIM to ask YOU to assume the burden of proof.
Maybe because they're 1% of the population, and hence, not too common.Gantz said:Is it still a taboo to show interracial couples or families on television on movies? You just don't see them on TV(maybe for the exception of PBS) or movies. Why is that? Are people afraid interacial couples will tear the fabric of society?
NotMSRP said:You don't see Asian/Indian/Other man with a white woman either.
Musashi Wins! said:I don't know what this adds to the thread but I have noticed this.....commercials never...ever...feature a black man with a white woman. I think but I'm not sure that I've seen the opposite once. And I often see commercials where a white man is paired with an Asian woman. Mind you, it's all contextual, but it's pretty clear in the brief presentation of a commercial landscape that these people are being represented as romantic mates, selling whatever product. And while it might shift a bit depending on the product, I've still never seen a television commercial featuring a couple where the man is black and the female is white.
25% of Asian females marry a white man. That's from the 1990 census -- it may be higher now. Cohabitation in 1990 is 45% white male/Asian female and 43% Asian male/Asian female.fobtastic said:This is pretty much spot on. It's taboo because those "interracial" couples tend to be limited to very specific pairings. With regards to the media, I see more Asian females partnered with a non-Asian male, than with an Asian male. Does this reflect real life? No. Anyone remember the Old Navy fiasco with Lisa Ling? From a business perspective, it makes sense since you don't want to alienate your largest market. From a political perspective, you're just asking for it. To put it quite bluntly, media only shows love for white males, white females, black males, black females, and Asian females.
Not the best article, but it gets the point across.
Stele said:25% of Asian females marry a white man. That's from the 1990 census -- it may be higher now. Cohabitation in 1990 is 45% white male/Asian female and 43% Asian male/Asian female.
http://www.gnxp.com/MT2/archives/000806.html
The only way trends like these will change is if China becomes the next superpower, and not just some associate member of the Western Civilization like Japan.
RevenantKioku said:Is a black man going to say "Well, this white woman is really attracted to me, and I to her, but I've never seen a couple like this in a TV commercial, so how can it work?"
Taboo, rampant? Who gives a flying fuck? Is it really that important to you? Really? Really? I mean come on people, look at what you're saying.
Stele said:But my article has Hispanic and Black data too.
fobtastic said:How old are you?
Yeah, passages of random shit.fobtastic said:Do you even know what you were reading?