MomoPufflet said:Working Designs fucked with the difficulty alot. It was harder than it should have been IMO. I was left with a bitter taste in my mouth.
White Man said:They left Alundra a virgin compared to their reworking of Silhouette Mirage. Alundra is still very playable and enjoyable from start to finish.
No amount of metallic ink and varnish can make bad graphic design good.R-User! said:Yes, it's worth it just for the BoxArt and the Manual!!!![]()
SKOPE said:No amount of metallic ink and varnish can make bad graphic design good.
That was something Vic Ireland never learned.
The game is good (albeit extremely difficult), but you'll only be impressed by the packaging if you're attracted to shiny objects.
Lyte Edge said:Definitely snatch it up for $30; even if you don't like the game, you should be able to resell it for more than you paid for it anyway.
Mejilan said:Also, my memory may be hazy, but I'm pretty sure that the game we got as Alundra 2 wasn't an Alundra game at all, but a completely different action rpg (made by the same developers), rebranded with the Alundra name (for sales purposes?)
iapetus said:I can only imagine the warped mind it takes to believe whole-heartedly that a shit game will somehow become less shit if you give it the name of a good game that nobody played...
[WD] made its debut on the PS1 with alundra, an overrated zelda III ripoff with a tenuous relationship to landstalker.
Yep, Sony forced Matrix to slap the Alundra brand on it.Mejilan said:Edit - Also, my memory may be hazy, but I'm pretty sure that the game we got as Alundra 2 wasn't an Alundra game at all, but a completely different action rpg (made by the same developers), rebranded with the Alundra name (for sales purposes?)
[WD] made its debut on the PS1 with alundra, an overrated zelda III ripoff with a tenuous relationship to landstalker.
lol Ferricide. Alundra did everything LttP did, but better and longer
ferricide's post-morten blog post wasn't very surprising to me. It's not unlike a lot of folks who keep mouthing off about business costs and etc but have no real clue to how it's done or not. They usually rely on hearsay or second-hand information to make their statements. Oh well, what can you do? It's the internet and it's to be expected.