SonnyBoy said:As a 27 year old black man who was told that he wouldn't be hired for his 1st IT gig in 2004 if his hair wasn't cut off, this situation makes sense.
Don't pretend like jobs don't act like black men and women with their hair in their "natural" state aren't professional.
I don't see how race has anything to do with what you're talking about. Long, natural hair isn't seen as professional for white men, either.SonnyBoy said:As a 27 year old black man who was told that he wouldn't be hired for his 1st IT gig in 2004 if his hair wasn't cut off, this situation makes sense.
Don't pretend like jobs don't act like black men and women with their hair in their "natural" state aren't professional.
This.Slavik81 said:I don't see how race has anything to do with what you're talking about. Long, natural hair isn't seen as professional for white men, either.
I had long hair through university, but cut it prior to going to my job interviews for that very reason.
Slavik81 said:I don't see how race has anything to do with what you're talking about. Long, natural hair isn't seen as professional for white men, either.
I had long hair through university, but cut it prior to going to my job interviews for that very reason.
And if you keep your eyes shut you won't see the racism in anything.Mr. B said:If you squint hard enough you can find racism in everything. That isn't racist.
I don't understand why people can't see this.besada said:I dunno, this one seems pretty racist to me. It's equating the natural state of black hair -- the Afro -- with being uncivilized. In addition there's a long history of blacks trying to hide their natural hair and make it more "white."
There's something wrong with expectations of personal grooming?
I don't see how race has anything to do with what you're talking about. Long, natural hair isn't seen as professional for white men, either.
Dreams-Visions said:the whole thing is questionable.
maybe if the guy wasn't also dressed like Carlton Banks and only had a short cut, it would have been more reasonable. As it stands, it suggests that you don't "give a damn" about your appearance if you're not dressed like a prep kid. And furthermore, that you're not really civilized (in the fashion sense).
To that end, it completely shits on urban fashion. That's what's not cool about it. You don't win over urban customers by shitting on urban fashion trends and styles. And of course, shitting on the afro--a style and image central to black culture since...forever--is...near-sighted at best.
Surely they could use more diversity on their marketing team. But what else is new?
royalan said:Ok, unintentional I'm sure, but that's a little racist. Where did he say that his hair wasn't styled or that his personal grooming was lacking? He simply said that his hair was long. Your post perfectly illustrates the unintentional racism behind people thinking that black men with long hair is uncivilized.
Milchjon said:Maybe people displaying an urban style aren't the main target group for facial skin products.
His says, "Sin city isn't an excuse to look like hell."MWS Natural said:Why doesn't the ad with the white guy say "uncivilized" next to his un-groomed head??
where the FUCK is Antarctica?Slayven said:This was printed in a comic recently. Guess what part got people into a tizzy.
![]()
the ad isnt alluding to professionalism. otherwise it would say so and not make the broader allusion to "civilized" appearance.Slavik81 said:I don't see how race has anything to do with what you're talking about. Long, natural hair isn't seen as professional for white men, either.
I had long hair through university, but cut it prior to going to my job interviews for that very reason.
Byakuya769 said:Yep. Pretty sure that this ad is geared towards civilized people.
I can read, just questioning why they didn't keep the same copy for both.Slavik81 said:His says, "Sin city isn't an excuse to look like hell."
MWS Natural said:I can read, just questioning why they didn't keep the same copy for both.
thank fuck black folks have people like you to tell us what's acceptable commentary and what isnt.FutureZombie said:Just once I'd like to see someone not cower to the PC police and instead say "It's not racist. Grow the fuck up. We are not retracting our (ad/ statement/ joke)".
Obviously this will never happen with a company, but individuals need to stand up against this lunacy. That ad is not racist.
Calling something like this racist demeans real racism. This is some boy cried wolf stuff. You can only feign outrage at this for so long until you've begun to desensitize people and eventually actual racism will be ignored due to sensationalism burnout.
theignoramus said:thank fuck black folks have people like you to tell us what's acceptable commentary and what isnt.
theignoramus said:thank fuck black folks have people like you to tell us what's acceptable commentary and what isnt.
Huh? I had to go look it up to find the entire quote. Some of the text in the image in this thread is unreadable because it blends into the background.MWS Natural said:I can read, just questioning why they didn't keep the same copy for both.
I should have said why didn't they run similar copy.Copernicus said:Cause it'd be a waste of copy to run innocuous tag lines on different layouts.
Ok, in this day and in age, In our incredibly rich society, looking poorly is about as close to uncivilized as anyone the ad is targeted at is going to get.MWS Natural said:Looking poorly != being uncivilized
MWS Natural said:I should have said why didn't they run similar copy.
Looking poorly != being uncivilized
lightless_shado said:Fun fact: If black people leave their hair unkempt, it does not look like an afro. An Afro is the result of actually taking the time to comb the hair.
In the multi-billion dollar cosmetic and grooming products industry "looking poorly" is a fate worse than death.MWS Natural said:I should have said why didn't they run similar copy.
Looking poorly != being uncivilized
Drkirby said:Yeah, I read more into this. See, that was one of three ads, run at the same time in the Netherlands. Here is anther ad from the same campaign (And was put up at the same time), but no few seem to cry foul and say its racists.
They really are crappy ads though, crop the PSPs out and you would have no clue what it was for.
Slayven said:This was printed in a comic recently. Guess what part got people into a tizzy.
lightless_shado said:Fun fact: If black people leave their hair unkempt, it does not look like an afro. An Afro is the result of actually taking the time to comb the hair.
And for further irony, the "uncivilized" head looks a lot like Cornel West.
royalan said:This.
I've seen a lot of posters in this thread indirectly compare the afro to a hippy with a long, shaggy unkempt hair and say it's the same thing.
Clearly they don't know a thing about the afro (and that'spart of the problem). Growing, primping and maintaining a perfectly round, even-bodied 'fro is serious business that requires delicate precision and finesse. The perfect afro is a symbol of pride and hard work.
A more accurate example of a black male with long, unkempt hair is French professional tennis player, Gael Monfils:
![]()
Urban or not, black people wouldn't find this ad palatable.Milchjon said:Maybe people displaying an urban style aren't the main target group for facial skin products.
shut the fuck up and open a history book. or try living a minority experience (oh wait, you can't).ReaperXL07 said:I think the better question is why has our society become so damn sensitive?
So what era of the "good old days" would you like us to go back to?ReaperXL07 said:I think the better question is why has our society become so damn sensitive?
How about moving forward?Htown said:So what era of the "good old days" would you like us to go back to?
Copernicus said:How about moving forward?
Sorry, I didn't realize this was a hair straightening and skin bleaching product.royalan said:To a world where "civility" and what is or isn't considered racially offensive is deemed by the white man? Doesn't seem very forward to me.