• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

King Fahad dies

Status
Not open for further replies.
RIP my thread.

BBC confirms succession here. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/4734175.stm
BBC > you.

King Fahd, Saudi Arabia's ruler since 1982, has died.
Saudi state television announced that Crown Prince Abdullah had been named as King Fahd's successor.

King Fahd had been frail since suffering a stroke a decade ago and had delegated the running of the kingdom's affairs to Crown Prince Abdullah.
 
Fahd is how the name should be pronounced in Classical Arabic. Fahad is how most people in the Gulf region would pronounce it.

And holy shit, he died? Thank God I'm not there right now.
 
Well, he had been quite ill, for quite a while. Not only did he have a stroke, but he suffered from diabetes as well.
 
this is really bad news, king Fahd was the father of all Saudis, it is kinda shocking, I can see sadness invades all the country...

we ask God to have mercy on him..Amen :(

he died? Thank God I'm not there right now.

why -_- ? we live in peace, we are not living in a desert or jungle , I am so disappointed that a lot of western people have many wrong thoughts about us, I just watched Bruce Willis’s Hostage, yesterday I ate a cheesburger meal from Mcdonald’s, now I am playing Ape Escape 3, next week I will purchase my Electric Blue DS... so we are human beings.. I hope you visit my country and see that by your own eyes.
 
Twix said:
this is really bad news, king Fahd was the father of all Saudis, it is kinda shocking, I can see sadness invades all the country... I just watched Bruce Willis’s Hostage, yesterday I ate a cheesburger meal from Mcdonald’s

King Fahd's death isn't the only reason a curtain of sadness has descended upon your fair country.
 
Twix said:
why -_- ? we live in peace, we are not living in a desert or jungle , I am so disappointed that a lot of western people have many wrong thoughts about us, I just watched Bruce Willis’s Hostage, yesterday I ate a cheesburger meal from Mcdonald’s, now I am playing Ape Escape 3, next week I will purchase my Electric Blue DS... so we are human beings.. I hope you visit my country and see that by your own eyes.

Any women drivers out on the roads? ;P
 
Twix said:
we live in peace, we are not living in a desert or jungle , I am so disappointed that a lot of western people have many wrong thoughts about us, I just watched Bruce Willis’s Hostage, yesterday I ate a cheesburger meal from Mcdonald’s, now I am playing Ape Escape 3, next week I will purchase my Electric Blue DS... so we are human beings.. I hope you visit my country and see that by your own eyes.
Is Pokemon still banned there?
 
Dude hadn't done anything for years anyway. Abdullah was running the show for a long while. To be blunt Fahd/Fahad finally kicking the bucket was just a formality.


Edit: Also, Saudi Arabia ain't a very nice country.
 
Any women drivers out on the roads? ;P

no, but at the same time, it is not prohibited in Islam, all the arguments nowadays about the tempting that may happened, I think it tends to be a social problem rather than a religious.

and yes, in Saudi Arabia we still have a lot of non-good customs far away from any Islamic directives.

about the Pokemon, I don’t know, maybe you should really laugh about it, what you gonna do if you know that in the middle of fifties, some people thought phones are some kind of Satanic works because you can hear someone’s voice far away from you, bicycles also called as " Lucifer Cart "..

we have a lot uneducated and unaware people, let’s say, Bedouins, they just focused in the juristic side " punishments- Judgments ".. and this is a wrong learning about Islamic legalisations,because Islam is combining between earthly & religious sciences not only the last one.

also the Pokemon incident maybe has a merchant side, Pokemon was some kind of addiction for children, every kid just want a Pokemon and nothing else,it has caused a slackening for other products, and some one just wanted to stop all of this.

and please read this:


The game has been criticised in several countries, with a Christian church in Mexico calling it "demonic", and organisations in Slovakia saying television shows based on the game were detrimental to children.

Pokemon on the rampage

In Britain, police have urged parents not to allow children out with the cards.

But across Britain, school children have fought to get their hands on the cards of the 151 Pokémon characters, based on the Japanese cartoon, film and computer game

it is a fever inavded all the world, not only SA, and every country has it is own laws, I cannot see any problem in this, I think Netherlands is allowing people to buy & sell drugs in public .. a respective affair :)

so, we should not generalize the bad behaviors to all the people, at anyplace in the world anybody can face good and bad guys.

I visited US many times, Universal Studios and Disney Land are incredibles, and yes we do not have such as thing like this in Saudi Arabia :P ..and yes America is a very nice counrty :)
 
Twix said:
I am so disappointed that a lot of western people have many wrong thoughts about us, I just watched Bruce Willis’s Hostage, yesterday I ate a cheesburger meal from Mcdonald’s, now I am playing Ape Escape 3, next week I will purchase my Electric Blue DS... so we are human beings.. I hope you visit my country and see that by your own eyes.


Unfortunately some of us western people have many thoughts about Saudi Arabia that are right. Don't think I'll be visiting anytime soon.
 
Having living in Saudi for over 5 years I know a lot of people are ignorant to their way of life. It's not as bad as most of you think and if you did visit you'd see a beautiful country full of accomodating and genuine people. Abdullah has been running this show for years now anyways so this news is expected as many have mentioned.
 
Twix said:
no, but at the same time, it is not prohibited in Islam, all the arguments nowadays about the tempting that may happened, I think it tends to be a social problem rather than a religious.

and yes, in Saudi Arabia we still have a lot of non-good customs far away from any Islamic directives.

Who said anything about Islam? I didn't. I made a comment about the laws concerning motor vehicles in your fine country :P

edit: and having people criticize a game is different from having it banned.
 
Boogie said:
edit: and having people criticize a game is different from having it banned.
And banning it for supposedly "promoting Zionism" is different than warning parents and children about crazy fans stealing cards or whatever...
 
To be fair Nintendo had to recall all the Pokemon cards that had the kanji of a temple (which bears a resemblance to the swastika). The star of David is seen the same way in Muslim countries. And actually the official reason for banning Pokemon cards is that it promotes gambling, IIRC.
 
Miburou said:
To be fair Nintendo had to recall all the Pokemon cards that had the kanji of a temple (which bears a resemblance to the swastika). The star of David is seen the same way in Muslim countries.
Not to derail the thread, but ...

Miburou said:
And actually the official reason for banning Pokemon cards is that it promotes gambling, IIRC.
That may be the case, the article I posted is sorta vague on that point.
 
Miburou said:
To be fair Nintendo had to recall all the Pokemon cards that had the kanji of a temple (which bears a resemblance to the swastika). The star of David is seen the same way in Muslim countries.

The difference being of course that the Jews never systematically murdered 6 million muslims. :P
 
Boogie said:
The difference being of course that the Jews never systematically murdered 6 million muslims. :P
Neither did the Muslims murder 6 million Jews.

We have Hitler to thank for that. ^_^
 
GaimeGuy said:
Neither did the Muslims murder 6 million Jews.

We have Hitler to thank for that. ^_^

captain.jpg
 
Firest0rm said:
You know that applies to you too?

Well, it must not be so obvious, because some people seem to think that it's all right that to equate how people view the swastika and how those in muslim countries view the Star of David.

The difference being, of course, that the swastika represents a regime which, again, systematically murdered 6 million jews, while the star of David represents [irrational muslim fanatic]Teh EVIL ZIONISTS, RAWR[/irrational muslim fanatic].

I'm just trying to point out that difference, that the swastika is rightfully maligned as representative of the most murderous regime in humanity's history, while the star of David is merely maligned because of muslim countries' unhealthy scapegoating of the Jews and Israel :)
 
Boogie said:
Well, it must not be so obvious, because some people seem to think that it's all right that to equate how people view the swastika and how those in muslim countries view the Star of David.

The difference being, of course, that the swastika represents a regime which, again, systematically murdered 6 million jews, while the star of David represents [irrational muslim fanatic]Teh EVIL ZIONISTS, RAWR[/irrational muslim fanatic].

I'm just trying to point out that difference, that the swastika is rightfully maligned as representative of the most murderous regime in humanity's history, while the star of David is merely maligned because of muslim countries' unhealthy scapegoating of the Jews and Israel.
But, what if, and this is a big if, *certain* Muslims had feelings of resentment towards the state of Israel not because they think they're "teh eveil zionists", but rather because of what *they* see as Israeli oppression of the Palestinians.

Wouldn't that be something?
 
ghostface said:
But, what if, and this is a big if, *certain* Muslims had feelings of resentment towards the state of Israel not because they think they're "teh eveil zionists", but rather because of what *they* see as Israeli oppression of the Palestinians.

Wouldn't that be something?

Yes, but would these muslims have such extreme antipathy toward the star of David, and view it as a symbol of "international Zionism"?

Would such muslims who simply have legitimate issues with the state of Israel go so far as to view the star of David in the same light as a swastika?
 
Boogie said:
Yes, but would these muslims have such extreme antipathy toward the star of David, and view it as a symbol of "international Zionism"?

Would such muslims who simply have legitimate issues with the state of Israel go so far as to view the star of David in the same light as a swastika?
a) I can't speak for other people, so I won't try. Also the term "such Muslims" could encompass all kinds of ideologies, both moderate and extreme.

b) Just because some may have issues with Israel and by extension, its flag, does not necessarily mean that they equate it with the swastika. That comparison was only brought up in this thread.
 
As much as I disagree with many of his political posts, Boogie is right on about the Star of David. And while Twix's English isn't good enough for me to tell what he's saying, the Saudi legal code is completely indefensible.

http://www.gaycitynews.com/gcn_418/insaudiarabiagaytourture.html

This past March, as is their habit, Saudi Security forces raided a party in Jeddah, arresting 110 men for attending a gay wedding. The Manchester Guardian noted that local news reports said the men were dancing and “behaving like women.” The harsh Saudi laws leave the men with only one defense—deny they are gay and deny that a gay wedding was taking place. The event may in fact have been a birthday party.

Amnesty International warned that the 35 men convicted would be tortured. Their sentence is horrifying. Two of the men may die because they will be flogged a total of 2,000 times during their two-year imprisonment; 33 men jailed for one year will be whipped 200 times. Moreover, to avoid any confusion about the government’s policy, the other arrested men were called back to court and given one-year prison terms.

And, of course, there's women's rights.

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2005/01/13/saudia9810.htm
Women’s Rights
Women in the kingdom suffer from severe discrimination and restrictions in their freedom. The Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, or the “religious police,” enforces strict gender segregation and obliges women and girls to wear long black cloaks and head coverings in public. Although some women hold professional jobs at hospitals, schools, banks, offices, and elsewhere, they still need written permission from a male relative to travel.

When women are mistreated or suffer violence at the hands of male relatives, they often have no means for redress. Rania al-Baz, a presenter on state-run Channel One television, raised the issue of domestic violence in an unprecedentedly public way in April 2004 when she gave press interviews from her hospital bed and released photos of her badly bruised face after her husband had savagely beaten her. Her case galvanized public opinion and stimulated considerable debate about the problem of spousal abuse.
 
Boogie said:
Would such muslims who simply have legitimate issues with the state of Israel go so far as to view the star of David in the same light as a swastika?
Oh dear, an offhand badly drawn analogy by Miborou becomes ammuntion for Boogie.

A far better analogy would be viewing the Star of David the way the sickle and hammer of Soviet Russia was viewed in America during the Cold War. Is that acceptable to you?
 
Azih said:
Oh dear, an offhand badly drawn analogy by Miborou becomes ammuntion for Boogie.

A far better analogy would be viewing the Star of David the way the sickle and hammer of Soviet Russia was viewed in America during the Cold War. Is that acceptable to you?

*ponders a moment*

I suppose so.
 
Boogie said:
The difference being of course that the Jews never systematically murdered 6 million muslims. :P

No, but Israel has a history of systematically ethnically cleansing Muslims. Or at least if you don't see that as the case, then at least accept the fact that this is how it is percieved by them (and you may think they are percieving it incorrectly, I'm not trying to change your view on the topic).

Plus, it wasn't a swastika, it's inverted, a symbol of power in some cultures.

My reply won't surprise most...I hope that this death can turn into something positive and real political change occurs as a result. This country that is the birthplace of Islam should start behaving more Islamically. Women's rights is an apparent issue, but there are other issues as well, such as poverty (while the whole country is sitting on liquid gold, kinda odd isn't it?).
 
Fight for Freeform said:
No, but Israel has a history of systematically ethnically cleansing Muslims.

Do you have a link? I'm not being a jackass. I've never heard of any "systematic ethnic cleansing" by Israel, and if you've got something you can point to, I would like to read it

Or at least if you don't see that as the case, then at least accept the fact that this is how it is percieved by them (and you may think they are percieving it incorrectly, I'm not trying to change your view on the topic).

Not to sound too glib (err, okay, too late, I admit), but I don't give a damn how they perceive the situation, if they perceive the situation wrong.


Plus, it wasn't a swastika, it's inverted, a symbol of power in some cultures.

I am vaguely aware of the origins of the symbol.

My reply won't surprise most...I hope that this death can turn into something positive and real political change occurs as a result. This country that is the birthplace of Islam should start behaving more Islamically. Women's rights is an apparent issue, but there are other issues as well, such as poverty (while the whole country is sitting on liquid gold, kinda odd isn't it?).

I'd like to see things change too, but I'm not hopefully, since he hasn't really been "in charge" for a decade.
 
Boogie said:
Do you have a link? I'm not being a jackass. I've never heard of any "systematic ethnic cleansing" by Israel, and if you've got something you can point to, I would like to read it

C'mon man, are you serious?

Here is a history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict from an Israeli perspective: http://www.mideastweb.org/briefhistory.htm

From a Palestinian POV:
http://www.is-pal.net/

From the BBC:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/world/2001/israel_and_palestinians/timeline/

wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli-Palestinian_conflict

Not to sound too glib (err, okay, too late, I admit), but I don't give a damn how they perceive the situation, if they perceive the situation wrong.

Then why do you care how they percieve the Star of David?

I'd like to see things change too, but I'm not hopefully, since he hasn't really been "in charge" for a decade.

Well I hope it causes people to question the usefulness of the monarchy.
 
Then why do you care how they percieve the Star of David?

He's saying that for them to view it as an analogue to a swastika is wrong because the views you're representing are dishonest and inaccurate.

The fact that he doesn't care whether they hold erroneous beliefs isn't a reason NOT to take issue with the crap analogy from posters here. Given how militantly some people hold their erroneous beliefs here, maybe it should be.
 
What an amusing thread. First the thread starter gets berated for starting a thread when another one already exists (eventhough that one got no replies), then an argument erupts over the King's name, and then when I settle that, a comment I make ("Thank God I'm not there now) get misinterpreted by someone who commences to spew some nonsense about how great the King and country are. All the while no one really comments on the topic of the thread.

As for my 'crap' analogy, the analogy wrote itself. Both were featured on Pokemon cards, and both caused a lot of outrage, eventhough ironically neither symbol was what it was perceived to be. The swastika is of course an ancient symbol for a Buddhist temple (you can find that symbol all over Japan, Korea and China), and the Star of David is used by the Japanese as a symbol for magic.

My point was that bringing up the Pokemon cards wasn't the best example to show how bad things are in Saudi Arabia, since anything with a Star of David on it would probably be banned in most (if not all) Muslim countires. Like it or not, Israel is seen by Muslims as a slaughterer of Palestinians.

Not to sound too obvious, but you know how there are nuts in the states who are always calling for the banning of all sorts of stuff? Well, those people are in power in countries like Saudi Arabia, and since people are brainwashed from birth, few really question that.
 
Miburou said:
My point was that bringing up the Pokemon cards wasn't the best example to show how bad things are in Saudi Arabia, since anything with a Star of David on it would probably be banned in most (if not all) Muslim countires.
My point wasn't "to show how bad things are in Saudi Arabia," it was to interject a little relevant-to-this-board sillyness about how crazy things have become in the world.

The fact that the Star of David is banned there is unfortunate but I guess understandable, just like it's unfortunate but understandable that the Star and the Crescent is banned in Israel and the in US.
 
McLesterolBeast said:
He's saying that for them to view it as an analogue to a swastika is wrong because the views you're representing are dishonest and inaccurate.

The fact that he doesn't care whether they hold erroneous beliefs isn't a reason NOT to take issue with the crap analogy from posters here. Given how militantly some people hold their erroneous beliefs here, maybe it should be.

It's completely honest and accurate to say that Palestinian lands that are being taken away are planted with flags bearing the Star of David.

This is a fact...I don't see how anyone can take issue with a fact.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom