Support NeoGAF

[MrAngryFace]

Im playing both. KuF rocks for its tactics n such, but DW4 has a lot going for it just with pure KILLIN ANCIENT CHINESE

 

[Drinky Crow]

DW4 offers a better fightnin' experience, but KUF does a GREAT job recreating the battles from those cheesy fantasy novels I read as a kid. I go either way.

 

[Ghost]

Hopefully Phantogram get to make a sequel with the same combat depth at DW.

 

[MightyHedgehog]

^^^
Yes. Hopefully.

They could also include the damned 4-player mode again...arrrrgh.

I agree with DC's comparison...KUF is better at strategy and thinking while DW4 is better at button-mash...errr....fighting. KUF nearly gets it all right, but seriously needs a some things to be ironed out and better-balanced for an expansion/sequel.

 

[AeroGod]

I liked Samurai Warriors more then DW4. Even if it didnt have as many characters I thought it was just a bit better. KuF I havnt really gotten into yet, and i probably wont since GTA comes out today. Ill probably leave KuF for next year sometime or holiday when there is nothing to play

 

[Go Go Ackman!]

DW4/Samurai Warriors. It's faster paced, the battles are less cluttered, and most importantly the hit detection feels way more solid.

 

[Chopin Trusty Balls]

KuF,because missions are much more varied,the story is intressting,and its just so much more satifacting when you win,also much more customisation and variety.

 

[joshschw]

I Like everything about Kingdom Under Fire more then Dynasty Warriors 4. I really never got into DW4 as it just felt so much more reptitive then KUF and the combat was not nearly as good, in my opinion. Is the PS2 version of DW4 supposed to be better? because I only played the Xbox version.

Oh and also graphically its no comparison between the two. KUF looks way nicer which really is making it even more fun.