Full story
WASHINGTON ― Renata Singleton is a black woman who spent five days in a New
Orleans jail because she couldnt afford her bail. Away from her three children, she lost
eight pounds before her mother was finally able to purchase her release.
When Singleton got home, she had an 8 p.m. curfew and started wearing bell-bottom
jeans to hide the electronic monitor on her ankle from her kids. Despite having a masters
degree in business administration, shes worried shell have trouble finding a new job:
Her mug shot and a record of her arrest are still floating around online.
None of those facts make Singletons story extraordinarily noteworthy: Legally innocent
defendants unable purchase their freedom ahead of trial are regularly locked up. Heres
what does: Singleton wasnt accused of a crime. She was the victim of one.
About three years ago, in November 2014, Singleton got into an argument with her
boyfriend. He shattered her phone. Her daughter called the police. The boyfriend was arrested.
Singletons ex-boyfriend was able to pay a $3,500 secured bond at his arraignment the next day, and he was
released. He later pleaded guilty to two misdemeanors and was sentenced to probation without jail time.
Singleton, the victim in the case, didnt have such an easy go of it. When a victim-witness
advocate for the Orleans Parish District Attorneys Office reached out to her, Singleton
said she wasnt interested in pursuing charges. She had a job that paid by the hour, and
she didnt want to miss out on work or time with her kids. Shed broken up with the man.
She was ready to move on.
Prosecutors didnt let her let it go. According to a lawsuit filed Tuesday against Orleans
Parish District Attorney Leon Cannizzaro and others in his office, investigators drafted up
subpoenas requiring Singleton to appear for a meeting at the district attorneys office in
April 2015, when the case against her ex-boyfriend was still pending.
Those documents were not actually subpoenas ― but the district attorneys office
misleadingly labeled them as such to compel Singleton to show up to a meeting.
Singleton didnt know that at the time, but she didnt go to the meeting because a friend
in law enforcement told her that she hadnt been validly served.
The day Singleton missed the meeting, an assistant district attorney applied for a material
witness warrant, asking the court to jail Singleton. Believing the fake subpoenas were
actual subpoenas, a judge issued the arrest warrant.
Singleton eventually met with prosecutors, but told them she wouldnt talk to them
without a lawyer present. Rather than granting her access to a lawyer, prosecutors had
Singleton led out of their office in handcuffs, and she was arrested on the warrant.
It was the first time Singleton had ever been arrested. She was taken to jail and forced
into an orange jumpsuit. Her bail was $100,000 ― more than 28 times the bail amount
set for her alleged abuser. She spent five days in jail before she went before a judge, who
reduced her bail to an amount her mother could afford.
Singleton is now the main named plaintiff in a lawsuit against Cannizzaro and his office
that alleges that his prosecutors routinely issue their own fabricated subpoenas directly
from the District Attorneys Office ― without any judicial approval or oversight ― in order
to coerce victims and witnesses into submitting to interrogations by prosecutors outside
of court.
Cannizzaro had challenged members of the New Orleans City Council last month to show him one person who was ever arrested on one of the D.A. notices. It evidently wasnt too hard: Civil rights investigators have already found at least 10 cases in the past three years in which prosecutors applied for arrest warrants by relying on the assertion that a witness didnt obey one of the offices fraudulent subpoenas.