The current Wikipedia article about NeoGAF is pretty bad, is marked for being biased (sounding like an advertisement) and needing more sources. Haven't decent sourceable articles been written about NeoGAF? There was that printed one over a year back but I think that's referenced to as a source for something on there.
Wikipedia's rules for if a web site is notable enough say that either of three rules:
The problem I can see if the article isn't re-written in part is that prople who have been banned from here might re-write it in their direction. There are a couple of such people discussing re-writing it [in their favour] on the discussion page.
Who else it up for this? I'm feeling like fixing sources for the history part right now.
Wikipedia's rules for if a web site is notable enough say that either of three rules:
- That site has to have been the subject of several independent articles.
- The site has won some kind of well-known or respected award.
- The site is the forum of a well-known company of other entity that there's an article about (I think that's what rule three says?).
The problem I can see if the article isn't re-written in part is that prople who have been banned from here might re-write it in their direction. There are a couple of such people discussing re-writing it [in their favour] on the discussion page.
Who else it up for this? I'm feeling like fixing sources for the history part right now.