Support NeoGAF

[Spider_Jerusalem]

...and you publish it on your site. After that, the editor calls you telling that it's fake, and he strongly insists with you to put it down even after you edited it writing *clearly* that it was fake by the editor admission. Let's say then that a major gaming forum deletes every post in which this list appears, even if they've always allowed rumors and false/leaked infos being posted, maybe locking the topics but not deleting them.

What would you think? Maybe I'm too paranoid at thinking that the list is real and the editor is making everything possible to limit its diffusion? ;-)

 

[Deleted member 1235]

I would think......

I don't think I would really think, more of a shrug.

 

[Blimblim]

I don't know what you are talking about.
*whistles innocently*

 

[Ghost]

Could mean its real, could also mean that theres an over-zealous new guy at ubi-pr.


There was nothing that shocking on it anyway

 

[R0nn]

Don't know if I'm allowed to say this (if not, delete this post) but after I posted the list on our site, Ubisoft was real quick with a strong request to pull the list offline asap.

Take that as you will.

 

[DefectiveReject]

If it was fake why would you ask everyone to delete it and not run it again, and not just deny it?

 

[Xrenity]

Could mean its real, could also mean that theres an over-zealous new guy at ubi-pr.

There was nothing that shocking on it anyway

I thought some Revolutionairy stuff was kind of okay.

 

[Wafflecopter]

I think making another thread about it would result in a ban.

 

[Borys]

Meh, another lock in the making.

 

[iapetus]

A suitably convincing fake leaked list can be as damaging to a company as a genuine leaked list in a lot of ways.