I cheered atAlien Bob said:this movie would've been enjoyable without Rob being such a stupid dickface the whole way through
GhaleonEB said:I cheered at. The worst camera man in history got his dues. He ruinied the movie!his getting munched in the end
teiresias said:Ummm, Rob was the guy looking for his girlfriend, Hud was the cameraman, and I found Hud to be the most tolerable of the characters (maybe Marlena too).
The Host was fucking horrible.Bursh said:I don't think its the best movie I saw this year or will be in my top 5 come December, but damn if it wasn't a really fun flick. I've yet to watch it at home but I think it would suffer if not paired with a good sound system. I think the most important part of the movie was how powerful the sound was. This movie needs good speakers. If people want to over-analyze the movie and find reasons not to like it then go ahead. Those complaining about there not being enough explanation are looking for the wrong things. Tell me the zerg rush in the subway was not intense.
If any of you want a more "realistic" monster movie that is really awesome then you should check out "The Host".
effingvic said:fucking hud.
i wish they made his death happen a lot earlier. like him, and marlenajust totally explode together or something
Wellington said:The Host was fucking horrible.
I think the investigation mode just sold me on the Blu-Ray version... well, at least netflixing it.
My bad. I couldn't remember any of their names. Still, comment stands, for Hud, the worst camera man on earth.teiresias said:Ummm, Rob was the guy looking for his girlfriend, Hud was the cameraman, and I found Hud to be the most tolerable of the characters (maybe Marlena too).
JB1981 said:I watched this last night and posted in the 'moves you have seen recently' thread
i'll just repost here:
Watched Cloverfield on blu-ray last night. Thought it was an effective movie: tense, visceral and very believable visual effects.
The conceit is a little hard to swallow, though - a.) the cameraman would never have run around with that camera that long (not when his life was in danger), b.) the camera battery would never have have lasted that long (i'd say there was at least 6 hours of time that passed) c.) how the fuck did they get the guy's girlfriend down the 57 fucking flights of stairs they had to climb to get to her, and d.) how the fuck was she moving her arm and not dying from extreme pain after being impaled by that bar?
Concept17 said:I agree with all except the bolded. Technically wasn't the camera only on for an hour and a half? The length of the movie? And was simply turned off at certain break points?
Kibbles said:Better in movie theaters. I liked it. It wasn't anything great, but it I liked it. Sequel is probably coming.
from a different perspective. (I think)Baiano19 said:a sequel?! how?
I loved Cloverfield but making a sequel wold be like making a sequel of Blair Wic... oh wait!
But, with Abrams you never know...
Thats the problem.. It's much better in 1080p.bill0527 said:50" Samsung 720p DLP
Wellington said:The Host was fucking horrible.
I think the investigation mode just sold me on the Blu-Ray version... well, at least netflixing it.
Bursh said:If any of you want a more "realistic" monster movie that is really awesome then you should check out "The Host".
HomerSimpson-Man said:Yeah, the movie was only like 1 hour and 20 minutes long.
Cloverfield 2: Euro TripBaiano19 said:a sequel?! how?
Yeah. The bigger technical goof like that was how the opening card said it was found on an SD card (ignoring the fact that this SD card can fit 90 minutes of Blu-ray quality 1080p video on it), and yet he's somehow taping over a previous recording as if it was on a linear medium. And Rob asks him at the party which tape he's recording on.msdstc said:seriously why can't people understand that? There are plenty of camera batteries that can last several hours easy as it is, but that's besides the point. The camera was only used for 80 minutes.
btkadams said:go to wikipedia. half of the story wasnt in the movie (lame as hell), it was done through viral marketing and stuff. just read the wikipedia article and youll be less pissed.
I liked it overall, but large sections of it were pretty bad. Great monster though, and that's all I wanted out of it.Snaku said:Wh
at
the
fu
ck
mac said:What a piece of crap. Can't they make just one horror movie without idiot characters, hackneyed dialogue and lame jokes? At least Blair Witch wasn't just a group of people shouting "OMG what is that?!" for 90 minutes. Cloverfield was standard issue cliche horror with POV, a brand new cliche added on top.
they did mention that at one point there was a person filming the characters we were following and that if they did a sequel it would be from their perspective. They probably scrapped that since I read it, though.demon said:from a different perspective. (I think)