• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Man Saves 3 lives gets run over and Jaywalking ticket

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tom Penny

Member
Gotta love it...

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2009/feb/24/injured-good-samaritan-gets-ticket-his-trouble/

He may have saved three lives, but RTD bus driver Jim Moffett got a jaywalking ticket anyway, along with broken bones.

Moffett, 58, was driving an RTD bus south on Federal Boulevard at 62nd Avenue at 9 p.m. Friday, the State Patrol said.

Two elderly women exited the bus and tried to walk across Federal to their trailer home on the east side, Moffett's stepson Ken McDonald said Tuesday.

"With that light snowstorm, my stepdad didn't think they could cross the street safely," McDonald said. "So he got off the bus with another passenger, and they helped the ladies cross."

The four people had made it about halfway across Federal, and most of the northbound traffic had slowed to let them go the rest of the way, McDonald said.

"But one pickup driver got impatient and passed in the left- hand turn lane," McDonald said. "He plowed right into my stepdad - but not before (my stepdad) pushed the old ladies and the other guy out of the way."

Moffett is at St. Anthony Central Medical Center with bleeding in the brain, broken bones in his face, a dislocated shoulder, a broken wrist and possible ruptured spleen and liver.

Eddie Moore, the passenger who helped Moffett assist the women, also was cited for jaywalking. The pickup driver, Steven C. David, was cited for careless driving causing injury.

The jaywalking citation should be dismissed and crosswalks should be installed, McDonald said. Ryan Sullivan, of the State Patrol, said that while Moffett's "intentions were good," jaywalking caused the accident.
 

Gallbaro

Banned
crowphoenix said:
No, the truck driver being an ass caused the accident. Pedestrians have the right of way. Always.

Ha, not in America!


Walking and cycling are for the poor and the DWI offenders, if you are not driving a 20ft long SUV you do not matter.


Seriously best way to murder someone and get away with it is to run them over, you will not even get charged with negligent homicide.
 

tokkun

Member
It was probably necessary to cite him for insurance reasons - in the case of accidents insurance companies usually require some determination of fault (unless you live in a state with 'no-fault' accident laws), so the police were required to cite both the driver and the people jaywalking as in violation of the law. No one is saying that the jaywalking citation will lead to any actual punishment.
 

zoku88

Member
Gallbaro said:
Ha, not in America!


Walking and cycling are for the poor and the DWI offenders, if you are not driving a 20ft long SUV you do not matter.


Seriously best way to murder someone and get away with it is to run them over, you will not even get charged with negligent homicide.
Where the heck are you from? In my part of America, what he said was 100% true.
 
Wow. That guy got some nasty injuries...hope he'll be fine. That asswipe's insurance better pay every dime of his medical bills and then some.
 

Gallbaro

Banned
zoku88 said:
Where the heck are you from? In my part of America, what he said was 100% true.

I am from NYC and Arkansas. If you are a livable street advocate like I am you will realize that government heavily favors the automobile driver in every way. Especially legally.
 
Bobby_Jindal%252C_official_109th_Congressional_photo.jpg
 
Gallbaro said:
I am from NYC and Arkansas. If you are a livable street advocate like I am you will realize that government heavily favors the automobile driver in every way. Especially legally.
What is a livable street?

Also, there's no way a NYC driver will touch a pedestrian, no matter how pissed they get. Pedestrians are constantly daring cars to bump in to them, without regard to lights or traffic conditions. Here, it's pretty well known that if you drive in the city, you let pedestrians get away with whatever they want.

On Long Island, on the other hand, the atmosphere is completely reversed. Pedestrians patiently wait on corners to let traffic through, and a driver will rarely wave you across. Also, there are no sidewalks on many streets. I hate this place, by the way.
 

inner-G

Banned
Gallbaro said:
Ha, not in America!


Walking and cycling are for the poor and the DWI offenders, if you are not driving a 20ft long SUV you do not matter.


Seriously best way to murder someone and get away with it is to run them over, you will not even get charged with negligent homicide.
You're... not from America, are you?
 
Walking and cycling are for the poor and the DWI offenders, if you are not driving a 20ft long SUV you do not matter.


Seriously best way to murder someone and get away with it is to run them over, you will not even get charged with negligent homicide.

i can't tell if you're being sarcastic or not....

i work in insurance and handle shit like pedestrian hits from time to time. trust me, the law absolutely sides with the pedestrian to a ridiculous degree.
 

Treo360

Member
Gallbaro said:
I am from NYC and Arkansas. If you are a livable street advocate like I am you will realize that government heavily favors the automobile driver in every way. Especially legally.


BS, I'm from NYC and we pedestrians practically dare drivers to hit us, and no, the Gov. doesn't favor the Automobile driver at all.
 

mre

Golden Domers are chickenshit!!
Did he jaywalk, yes or no?

If yes, then he deserves the ticket. If no, then this should be rectified. Regardless, I hope he learned his lesson about helping others.
 

Tom Penny

Member
mre said:
Did he jaywalk, yes or no?

If yes, then he deserves the ticket. If no, then this should be rectified. Regardless, I hope he learned his lesson about helping others.

And what lesson would that be?
 

livestOne

Member
Ha, not in America!

Walking and cycling are for the poor and the DWI offenders, if you are not driving a 20ft long SUV you do not matter.

Seriously best way to murder someone and get away with it is to run them over, you will not even get charged with negligent homicide.
inner-G said:
You're... not from America, are you?
definitely not, probably Texas
 

Gallbaro

Banned
livestOne said:
definitely not, probably Texas

As I said before I am a New Yorker, trapped in Arkansas, who cannot wait to get rid of his car when he moves back. It was a sarcastic representation on the American psyche towards pedestrian-ism. As I said earlier the United States places such little responsibility in the hands of people driving machines that kill more people in the US than guns do.

http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/02/11/pedestrian-dead-after-van-drags-him-17-miles/
http://www.streetsblog.org/2009/01/...-unanswered-in-aftermath-of-chinatown-deaths/

Just look at those two cases, kill someone with a car in this country, even in NYC where most households do not even own cars and you will not get so much as a citation.

Those are just recent examples of the justice even class inequity automobiles bring, since I have been active in the livable street community for a few years I have heard almost on a daily basis of the lack of legal responsibilities drivers have in exchange for the ability to direct the movements of tons of steel.
 
As I said earlier the United States places such little responsibility in the hands of people driving machines that kill more people in the US than guns do.

obviously some cases are going to slip through the cracks and seem ridiculous, but let me tell you first hand that the laws ABSOLUTELY favor the pedestrian. i work with this shit every day, trust me.
 
crowphoenix said:
No, the truck driver being an ass caused the accident. Pedestrians have the right of way. Always.
Be careful if you ever visit Quebec because they disagree. Not that I advocate visiting Quebec anyway.
 
Gallbaro said:
Ha, not in America!


Walking and cycling are for the poor and the DWI offenders, if you are not driving a 20ft long SUV you do not matter.


Seriously best way to murder someone and get away with it is to run them over, you will not even get charged with negligent homicide.
Gallbaro is correct on the bold part. most people who kill another using a car (as long as it was not intentional) ie: drunks,speeders, careless drivers get off with bail,community service or a very light sentence. very rarely do they get more than 5 years in prison.
 

Pimpwerx

Member
crowphoenix said:
No, the truck driver being an ass caused the accident. Pedestrians have the right of way. Always.
Not in Florida they don't. Down here it's only if you see a No Turn On Red (when pedestrians in crosswalk) sign. Otherwise, we can turn freely on red. Pedestrians generally yield to cars. You can easily spot the transplants b/c they're the ones who stop to let people cross the street. Here in Miami, if you're not driving, you're among the walking dead. PEACE.
 
Shalashaska said:
Be careful if you ever visit Quebec because they disagree. Not that I advocate visiting Quebec anyway.
I'll remember that if I ever get a chance to visit there.

Pimpwerx said:
Not in Florida they don't. Down here it's only if you see a No Turn On Red (when pedestrians in crosswalk) sign. Otherwise, we can turn freely on red. Pedestrians generally yield to cars. You can easily spot the transplants b/c they're the ones who stop to let people cross the street. Here in Miami, if you're not driving, you're among the walking dead. PEACE.

And that too. Thanks.
 

Slavik81

Member
crowphoenix said:
No, the truck driver being an ass caused the accident. Pedestrians have the right of way. Always.
You can be the cause of accidents even if you do have the right of way.
 
Slavik81 said:
You can be the cause of accidents even if you do have the right of way.
You're right, of course, but at least to me, those seem like they would be rare cases. Such as here, it seems that the truck was stopped before he tried to floor it past them, so it was his choice to do that that caused this.

But do you have any stats on the subject? It would be an interesting read.
 
Gallbaro said:
I am from NYC and Arkansas. If you are a livable street advocate like I am you will realize that government heavily favors the automobile driver in every way. Especially legally.
i dunno what NYC you mean, but you obviously don't mean New York City.
 

Gallbaro

Banned
The Faceless Master said:
i dunno what NYC you mean, but you obviously don't mean New York City.

The sheer mass of pedestrians in NYC give them the upper hand in mobility, but run over a cyclist or pedestrian and the police will not give you a hassle.

And still when you calculate the amount of public land in NYC and its purpose something like %70 of it is dedicated to the automobile. There is still a huge inequity in the subsidy of the automobile in NYC. The new DOT commissioner Shah Kasahn (something along those lines) is the most powerful livable streets advocate in the US, removing car capacity for pedestrian and cycling improvements, but she has no control over NYPD enforcement and Attorney prosecutions.

NYPD and State attorneys simply DO NOT PROSECUTE vehicular based crimes against pedestrians.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom