I'm going to just copy paste this here, again.
BTW, if you want proof that his star power played a part in it you just have to look at how the timeline of things played out originally vs what they told you. Again, I'm a fan of Jackson but we have to admit that like many celebrities he's no angel and used his star power to his advantage.
The testimony FROM THE CHILD is what caused them to take photos of Jackson, his Lawyers, you know the people paid to represent him, knew how bad this was. If you care about the truth I implore you to read and look at the documents and sources I provide.
Details you never heard back then from a detective who headed up the Jackson investigation, speaking out for the first time.
www.nbcnews.com
Dworin says one critical piece of corroborating evidence was found not in Michael Jackson's home, but on Michael Jackson's body: an intimate description that the young boy gave police.
Dworin: "We had served a search warrant to photograph Michael Jackson. Those photographs corroborated the description that the boy gave us regarding Michael Jackson's genitals."
Mankiewicz: "The boy was able to describe discolorations of Jackson's skin?"
Dworin: "Yes."
Mankiewicz: "On his genitals, accurately."
Dworin: "Very much so."
--------
Further evidence, from the horses mouth as submitted by Tom Sneddon.
5. I have reviewed the statements made by Jordan Chandler in his interview on December 1, 1993, I have examined the drawing made by Jordan Chandler at Detective Fernffino's request and the photographs taken of Defendant's genitalia. The photographs reveal a mark on the right side of the Defendant's penis at about the same relative location as the dark blemish located by Jordan Chandler on his drawing of Defendant's erect penis. I believe the discoloration Chandler identified in his drawing was not something he could or would have guessed about, or could have seen accidentally. I believe Chandler's graphic representation of the discolored area on Defendant's penis is substantially corroborated by the photographs taken by Santa Barbara Sheriff's detectives at a later time.
-----
Understand had it gone to trial, IT WOULD have been shown and so far the only people who've seen the child's drawing (officially at least) are Jackson's lawyers, Sneddon and the Judge overseeing the case afterwards.
It was after this he settled for 15 million dollars. The investigation was so worried about the cult of personality around Jackson they were digging for even more evidence because they knew the uphill battle they had coming their way, but this photo alone put the fear of god into his defense team.
His lawyers referred to it as "The 300 pound gorilla" and clearly implied he was abusing children and the only way to win was hush money.
And I hate having to say this but often the
ONLY way to see justice with powerful people who can avoid jail time
IS FINANCIALLY. If they wanted the money so bad why would they sign a settlement only meant to go to Jordan Chandler when he's an adult? The parents would have NO rights to this money, it's all Jordan's and NO ONE ELSE HAS RIGHTS TO IT.
And if you don't believe me, feel free to read the entire leaked settlement document, with MJ's own signature.
The timeline for the Dad is also ridiculous, he only sought to get cash
after the fact they likely already expended thousands of dollars going after him in legal fees, only for the actual payout to be 5 years away and only going to the child,
as it rightly should. In fact, from what I remember Jordan wanted to escape the entire ordeal that he emancipated himself and basically vanished off the face of the earth and I couldn't be anything but happy for him.
Is the Dad a nutjob? Yep. Does that make MJ innocent? Abso-fucking-lutely NOT.
I'll even throw you a hypothetical, in the even this was all Blackmail.
That evidence of Blackmail was so problematic it yielded an 8 figure pay-out because the evidence of said Blackmail was that damning. Blackmail only works when the evidence is damaging.
Also, I just want to throw this out there but after his death the FBI found some books called
The Boy: A Photographic Essay and another called "Boys will be Boys"
were found in his home in a locked cabinet. Those books are categorized as a 6 on the COPINE scale, meaning they're innapopriate images of minors bordering on pornography. If he had nothing to hide they wouldn't behind sealed and locked cabinets, right?
en.wikipedia.org
What more evidence do you want?
The 800+ 1-on-1 sleepovers?
The patterns of befriending young children till they show signs of puberty?
The video where his sister says the parents were paying off multiple other families?
The full context of Wade Robinsons "master of deception" quote, where the reality is that he was meaning how Michael taught him how to lie about it?
There is a reason a lot of people keep fighting for Michael, because of everything that is out there, the facts, evidence, logic and common sense. It's why I can listen to his music, watch the short films, the interviews, read his book and be grateful for the immense amount of good deeds for charities with a clear conscience. And you should be too, but that is all up to you.
What do these accusing families have in common? Never sticking to one story, multiple different versions of these alleged events, constant lying. Does a victim of any crime need to lie? No!
I didn't want to bother anymore because God knows how many folks I've been trying to give the actual facts on Twitter for a long time now. Tired of it.
Earlier you pasted links from the website MJ Facts, just be aware of what a ridiculous website that is. It's known for spreading tons of (proven) lies and anything remotely about truth is not found there. It's very unfortunate they were able to name the website like that because it's the exact opposite. They do not care about the truth, it's that simple.
MJFacts it's basically The Sun, Radar Online, truth? What is that?
I do have a few sites for you that you could check out if you want facts, these people basically dedicated a big amount of years to making these websites.
This article is a little bit redundant, because most of the issues addressed here have already been addressed elsewhere on this website. Nevertheless, I collected them in this one article, because …
themichaeljacksonallegationsblog.wordpress.com
Here we go.
Dworin!
Detractors also use Bill Dworin, a retired LAPD detective as a source, who made his media rounds during the 2005 trial (including in documentaries heavily biased against Jackson), and who claimed in those interviews that Jordan's description was a match.
However, Dworin was not among the detectives present during the strip search. He also never said that he had seen both the photographs and the description. The information he offered to the media is hearsay by someone who was obviously very biased for the prosecution.
The description
UPDATED November 6, 2019 The boys from a certain MJ haters’ site are on a march against Michael Jackson again. Judging by the number of readers’ questions about their lies disproved by us ye…
vindicatemj.wordpress.com
And those are all extremely long reads (these folks DO do their research) a summary :
- The light splotches on the buttocks were seen by Evan Chandler and this is why they were described correctly.
- The Chandlers assumed that Michael had a similar color combination on his genitalia too.
- But over there he was predominantly white, so Jordan's incorrect story about a light splotch had to be changed by Sneddon into the correct story about a dark spot.
- Jordan's another mistake was in the circumcision issue.
- When the photos showed his mistake Jordan's initial claim made to Dr. Gardner that he had allegedly masturbated MJ had to be dropped and never recalled again.
- To cover up for this Jordan's mistake Sneddon never mentioned "circumcision" but spoke of the "erect" penis instead.
But the erect penis is not the same as circumcision as the foreskin slides during erection, and if the "masturbation" had ever really taken place Jordan would have noticed it.
So there was no masturbation and this makes Jordan's interview with Dr. Gardner just a worthless pack of lies.
Settlement
A frequently asked question regarding the child molestation allegations against Michael Jackson is: “If he was innocent why did he settle the first case out of court?” To understand his possible re…
themichaeljacksonallegationsblog.wordpress.com
It is important to emphasize that it was the Chandler family who demanded a settlement from the very beginning and it was not Michael Jackson who sought it. In actuality, since early August of 1993 Evan Chandler demanded money from the star which Jackson refused to comply with and that is what resulted in the Chandlers going public with their allegations. Had Jackson wanted to "hush" the accuser he could have paid them off before they turned to authorities and to the public because the Chandlers admittedly wanted nothing more than being "paid off". Details in the former chapter entitled The Chandlers' Monetary Demands.
The two books
This article is a little bit redundant, because most of the issues addressed here have already been addressed elsewhere on this website. Nevertheless, I collected them in this one article, because …
themichaeljacksonallegationsblog.wordpress.com
They did have nude images of children, but they were in non-sexual context. They show children playing, among other things on the set of the 1963 movie Lord of The Flies. Now, just because some people may find this "erotic" because of the nudity, it does not mean that everyone does, and it does not mean that everyone who has these books uses them as "erotica". In fact, both of those books are in the US Libarary of Congress (see here and here). Jackson got at least one of them, if not both (since they are sequels to each other), from a fan, as the inscription in one of the books shows: "To Michael: From your fan, "Rhonda" ♥ 1983, Chicago". An inscription by Jackson himself in the other indicates that he did NOT look at these pictures in a sexual way: "Look at the true spirit of happiness and joy in these boys' faces. This is the spirit of boyhood, a life I never had and will always dream of. This is the life I want for my children, MJ." [8]
Locked behind closed cabinet
Some detractors try to make much of the fact, that the two art books were found in the third drawer of a locked file cabinet. For that reason they call it Jackson's "secret child erotica collection". First of all, it was hardly "secret", as according to the testimonies of the police officers who found them they asked a maid of Jackson's who had the key to it, to open it for them. [10] Had it been a "secret", Jackson would have kept the key with himself or had hidden it somewhere.
LaToya Jackson
And if you want to read up way more on it...
https://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/2...out-michael-jackson-is-a-must-see/#more-20790
Or you could watch Square One for that.
There is an explanation for every one of these things you posted. People might scoff when you say there's a conspiracy when it comes to him, but it's simply the truth. It's insane how even after death some people (with a history of lies) keep going after him, but he's an incredibly easy target and no longer here to defend himself.
I implore you to truly read up on Robson before you say what you said about him being master of deception. Dude is the biggest liar you can imagine. Years after MJ's death he praised him to the high heavens. In a opus about Michael:
http://www.reflectionsonthedance.com/Wade-Robson-Opus-Tribute-to-MJ.html
Check the picture and read what he says about Michael there.
So for years after MJ died dude was doing alright, until he was dying to be part or helm a huge MJ musical. The estate basically said his he wasn't good enough and that's when dude completely turned around, all of a sudden remembered abuse, tried to sell books that way, it wasn't really picked up, sued estate for countless of money (even though he claims it's not about money) and then the ridiculous "documentary" aired.
It is really easy to see ajs read something, think of what an unusual and eccentric man he was and then believe it all. But no, you have to do tons and tons of research because a lot is completely utter bullshit. I'll give you another example. Former Neverland maid Adrian McManus, many years ago she did her rounds in the tabloids and in TV shows and "docs" saying she saw horrible stuff, I won't go into details.
This woman to this day is able to still say all these things in TV shows, interviews. Which is insane, why? Because on the stand she admitted she made it all up, it's all lies. In fact to this day she owes Michael and now estate a lot of money, she stole from the property along with a few other ex employees. Yes, it's a whole shit show, it's unbelievable that this isn't punishable by law, complete utter lies that were proven to be lies, admitting in the goddamn courtroom these are lies and she can just go her merry way.
I have zero doubts about the man's innocence. His lyrics make it clear, his interviews, his words, his behaviour in videos that leaked after his death that shows him being a father to his kids, the words of those that did not stab him in the back.
The video he released called private home movies where we see him with Janet and several children at Neverland just goofing around, he's clearly a big kid himself there and I can go on.
If it would ever come out I was dead wrong, clear evidence of him being a CM is found I'd drop the music immediately and never go near it again. But I don't believe in that possibility, not even 0,01%.
