-
Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!
Midway Arcade Treasures 3 screens
- Thread starter DMczaf
- Start date
Shogmaster
Member
+
= GOTM*
*Millenium
happyfunball
Member
Shogmaster said:
+
= GOTM*
*Millenium
HAHA, hells yea. I used to go crazy on that shit in the arcades. I even bought a Lynx for this game and Ninja Gaiden.......good times.
radios shipping overview
Member
Hello, traumatic childhood memories. I haven't missed you.
Leatherface
Member
can not fucking wait for this. For SR alone!
PanopticBlue
Member
Man I really hope Midway aren't complete dipfucks and leave out Driving Force Pro support. Every game on here better have it. I want it even in Hydro Thunder.
Bartman3010
Banned
I'd really like to see what multiplayer looks like, since most of them are arcade ports, why havent we gotten any splitscreen modes yet?
However, the fact Rush 2049 is the console edition, thats very awesome, Midway. $20 or $30, this is oh so mine.
However, the fact Rush 2049 is the console edition, thats very awesome, Midway. $20 or $30, this is oh so mine.
The Take Out Bandit
Member
Did someone say Midway Arcade Turds?
'Coz I don't see no treasures here. :lol
'Coz I don't see no treasures here. :lol
JadedGamer
Banned
ManaByte said:
No the Arcade version looked better. The Arcade version of Rush 2049 also looked better than the DC version.
Barnimal said:
...
1) The "worst" versions of each game? Whatever do you mean? Except for the very RARE exception, the arcade versions of old Midway/Atari games were better than any home ports.
2) No online play? How many of those games SUPPORTED online play in the first place?
3) Glitchy -- we'll see. The Digital Eclipse emulations of the 2D games should be very good -- it's the Midway reprogrammings of the 3D ones that I'm worried about.
4) What in the world does "horrenous" mean?
JadedGamer said:
Hydro Arcade did indeed look better than the DC version (and obviously didn't suffer from the same lengthy loadtimes as the DC). However, 2049 looked MUCH better on the DC. Not only did the DC version run at 60 fps (most of the time...as smoke completely bogged the game down), it was more detailed overall. The AC version had a terrible framerate...
ManaByte said:
nope.
even though Dreamcast is more powerful than the hardware that powered Hydro Thunder arcade: the 'Quicksilver' hardware which uses a 3Dfx Obsidian Voodoo2, the Dreamcast conversion was overall, a downgrade in graphics.
the water and everything looked better in the arcade. Dreamcast version seems to use less polygons, even though DC is capable of more polygons than a Voodoo2.
I suppose there are some areas where the DC Hydro Thunder is better than the arcade. but I cant think of any offhand.
Pudding Tame
Member
Is that Test Drive'n or Race Drive'n
Link316 said:
I know, and I normally would too. however, for example, San Francisco Rush: The Rock in the arcade was only about 30 to 35 fps so that's all I expect the Midway Arcade Treasures 3 version to be. ( SF Rush on N64 was only 20 to 25 fps ).
Hydro Thunder arcade, I don't know if it was 30 or 60 fps. being that it was on a single Voodoo2, it was probably 30fps
SF Rush 2049: the arcade was definitally 30fps. the Dreamcast version was 60fps most of the time. since MAT3 has the Dreamcast SF Rush 2049, its going to be closer to 60fps