• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Netflix Project Power Trailer

Jooxed

Gold Member


Project Power (2020) When a pill that gives its users unpredictable superpowers for five minutes hits the streets of New Orleans, a teenage dealer and a local cop must team with an ex-soldier to take down the group responsible for its creation.
 

JLMC469

Banned
giphy.gif
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
Huh, decent trailer, hard to say.

Seems odd that this would be a criminal enterprise and not a major national project, though if it is just blood from Jamie's kid or whatever I guess that might explain it.

I never understand why script writers want to put in hard time limits for everything. I know the easy tension of a timer running down and all, but seems to me that a 2-8 minute span would allow for more uncertainty and dramatic tension, plus alleviate the poor editor from having to try to convey EXACTLY 5 minutes each time.
 

YCoCg

Member
anyone watch this shit? how woke was it
Actually not really woke at all. It was a passable action movie that you can probably throw on in the background or something, not much to think about, few cool fight scenes, few "that's dumb" moments, felt like a weird "New Orleans Vice" at times. Certainly better than that garbage "The Old Guard", more in line with "Extraction".
 
yeah i can see why this movie is on netflix....it has a great cast and premise but its executed really poor
the camera work and framing of scenes is just off any it comes off as being a cheap student movie with a-list actors

It just does not have any punch to it...i wanted to turn it off about halfway through
 

Weiji

Banned
The trailer has every good scene in the movie. Total fail. Really annoying seeing so much talent wasted. Also where the fuck did they get these teenage actors? They’re awful.

Maybe spend less time on fat girls doing rap and more time one the actual “powers” you claim are the draw of the movie?
 

BluRayHiDef

Banned
I watched it on Friday. It's the most Hollywood-esque movie that Netflix has ever produced in terms of its cinematography, visual effects, and the quality of its actors. However, like most of Netflix's other original movies, its screenplay is pedestrian, as it's structured around tropes (e.g. the government experimenting on citizens, a lone father searching for his daughter, etc). Hence, I rate it as follows:

1. Cinematography: 8.5/10
2. Visual Effects: 7.5/10
2. Acting: 8/10
2. Action: 5/10
3. Screenplay: 4/10

Final Score: [(8.5 + 7.5 + 8 + 5 + 4)/5]/10 = [33/5]/10 = 6.6/10
 
I watched it on Friday. It's the most Hollywood-esque movie that Netflix has ever produced in terms of its cinematography, visual effects, and the quality of its actors. However, like most of Netflix's other original movies, its screenplay is pedestrian, as it's structured around tropes (e.g. the government experimenting on citizens, a lone father searching for his daughter, etc). Hence, I rate it as follows:

1. Cinematography: 8.5/10
2. Visual Effects: 7.5/10
2. Acting: 8/10
2. Action: 5/10
3. Screenplay: 4/10

Final Score: [(8.5 + 7.5 + 8 + 5 + 4)/5]/10 = [33/5]/10 = 6.6/10
I hated the cinematography.....had some really weird camera framing issues like the operator put the camera down for lunch and they shot the scene before they got back
 

Weiji

Banned
I watched it on Friday. It's the most Hollywood-esque movie that Netflix has ever produced in terms of its cinematography, visual effects, and the quality of its actors. However, like most of Netflix's other original movies, its screenplay is pedestrian, as it's structured around tropes (e.g. the government experimenting on citizens, a lone father searching for his daughter, etc). Hence, I rate it as follows:

1. Cinematography: 8.5/10
2. Visual Effects: 7.5/10
2. Acting: 8/10
2. Action: 5/10
3. Screenplay: 4/10

Final Score: [(8.5 + 7.5 + 8 + 5 + 4)/5]/10 = [33/5]/10 = 6.6/10

I think the acting from the two famous leads was pretty good, but all the secondary characters were awful. And the movies villains were some of the worst / most boring I’ve ever seen on screen.

Acting should be a 6 IMO.

Otherwise I agree with your above methodology.
 

BluRayHiDef

Banned
I think the acting from the two famous leads was pretty good, but all the secondary characters were awful. And the movies villains were some of the worst / most boring I’ve ever seen on screen.

Acting should be a 6 IMO.

Otherwise I agree with your above methodology.
I found the acting of Jamie Foxx, Jason Gordon Levit, and Dominique Fishback to be very good. Hence, since the majority of the movie's runtime is divided between them, I based my rating for the movie's acting mainly on their performances.
 
I watched it on Friday. It's the most Hollywood-esque movie that Netflix has ever produced in terms of its cinematography, visual effects, and the quality of its actors. However, like most of Netflix's other original movies, its screenplay is pedestrian, as it's structured around tropes (e.g. the government experimenting on citizens, a lone father searching for his daughter, etc). Hence, I rate it as follows:

1. Cinematography: 8.5/10
2. Visual Effects: 7.5/10
2. Acting: 8/10
2. Action: 5/10
3. Screenplay: 4/10

Final Score: [(8.5 + 7.5 + 8 + 5 + 4)/5]/10 = [33/5]/10 = 6.6/10
Huh, interesting way of rating movies. But what does "Action" mean? Why not music?
 

Weiji

Banned
I found the acting of Jamie Foxx, Jason Gordon Levit, and Dominique Fishback to be very good. Hence, since the majority of the movie's runtime is divided between them, I based my rating for the movie's acting mainly on their performances.

Dominique Fishback has exactly one acting technique and it’s ‘strong independent womyn, oh noes! oppression! Oh noes! the system! Sad fishface woh is me’.

I wouldn’t even call her a character so much as a walking stereo type.

That can work if the stereotype is interesting and you sell it. But it’s not and she doesn’t.
 

BluRayHiDef

Banned
Huh, interesting way of rating movies. But what does "Action" mean? Why not music?
Action refers to the action sequences, which are important for this movie since it's an action movie. As for audio, I was going to include a rating for it, but I concluded that the movie probably required a 5.1 channel audio setup, which I don't have, and that therefore it wouldn't be fair for me to judge the audio; it was muffled and unbalanced to me, which is how 5.1 channel audio sounds when I play it through my stereo system.
 

BluRayHiDef

Banned
Dominique Fishback has exactly one acting technique and it’s ‘strong independent womyn, oh noes! oppression! Oh noes! the system! Sad fishface woh is me’.

I wouldn’t even call her a character so much as a walking stereo type.

That can work if the stereotype is interesting and you sell it. But it’s not and she doesn’t.
I don't agree. She convincingly exhibits fear and vulnerability when Art abducts her and when she's traversing the supermarket as he instructs her to do. She emotes nervousness and uncertainty as she walks through the supermarket, and she speaks with an appropriate lack of conviction when speaking to the supermarket worker.
 

DeafTourette

Perpetually Offended
I don't agree. She convincingly exhibits fear and vulnerability when Art abducts her and when she's traversing the supermarket as he instructs her to do. She emotes nervousness and uncertainty as she walks through the supermarket, and she speaks with an appropriate lack of conviction when speaking to the supermarket worker.

I agree. Grace Randolph said she was the best thing in the movie. My friend and I agree. She was the MVP of the whole movie! She is the linchpin of the story.

And Weiji Weiji ... Why are you concerned about her weight? She's an actual CHILD! She wasn't written to be a supermodel.

And she isn't even fat! She has a chubby face. That's it. If you actually watched the movie, you'd see that, especially in the end when she got the package from the trunk.
 

Neolombax

Member
Its an average movie. Enjoyed my time with it although the plot could be way better and more interesting. Acting was quite good for the most part. Its got nice visual effects although I will say the gore felt forced and had an unexpected amount too.
 

Weiji

Banned
I agree. Grace Randolph said she was the best thing in the movie. My friend and I agree. She was the MVP of the whole movie! She is the linchpin of the story.

And Weiji Weiji ... Why are you concerned about her weight? She's an actual CHILD! She wasn't written to be a supermodel.

And she isn't even fat! She has a chubby face. That's it. If you actually watched the movie, you'd see that, especially in the end when she got the package from the trunk.

I watched the movie, she’s trash, and I’ll be avoiding her actively going forward.

No idea why you guys think she’s a good actress. I’ve seen better at local community colleges.

But hey if you like her enjoy. You probably love Netflix movies, that’s about the level she operates at.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
I agree. Grace Randolph said she was the best thing in the movie. My friend and I agree. She was the MVP of the whole movie! She is the linchpin of the story.

And Weiji Weiji ... Why are you concerned about her weight? She's an actual CHILD! She wasn't written to be a supermodel.

And she isn't even fat! She has a chubby face. That's it. If you actually watched the movie, you'd see that, especially in the end when she got the package from the trunk.
Did you just....SEXUALIZE A CHILD???
 

BluRayHiDef

Banned
I agree. Grace Randolph said she was the best thing in the movie. My friend and I agree. She was the MVP of the whole movie! She is the linchpin of the story.

And Weiji Weiji ... Why are you concerned about her weight? She's an actual CHILD! She wasn't written to be a supermodel.

And she isn't even fat! She has a chubby face. That's it. If you actually watched the movie, you'd see that, especially in the end when she got the package from the trunk.

According to Google, the actress who portrayed her is 29 years old.
 
Last edited:
Fox and Gordon-Levitt were solid, the cinematography/effects/audio were quite well done and crisp but the overall movie was pretty average. It's not something I'd watch again.
 

BluRayHiDef

Banned
Fox and Gordon-Levitt were solid, the cinematography/effects/audio were quite well done and crisp but the overall movie was pretty average. It's not something I'd watch again.
How many channels does your sound system have? I have a simple stereo system (Logitech speakers with 30Watt subwoofer) and the audio sounded muffled to me, which has led me to believe that it's comprised of more than two channels.
 

quickwhips

Member
Watched it because i like JGL. It was ok but forgettable. Had a few moments that made my eyesroll like of course netflix puts certain lines in the script for woke points. Fighting was weak. I thought the idea was cool. I want a rising star tv show.
 
How many channels does your sound system have? I have a simple stereo system (Logitech speakers with 30Watt subwoofer) and the audio sounded muffled to me, which has led me to believe that it's comprised of more than two channels.

I was listening on stereo headphones last night. Astro A10s plugged into an elite 2 controller with the Xbox stereo adapter specifically. No audio issues here.

u_10011303.jpg
 
Top Bottom