:lolThank you!
golem said:its funny because its true.. ati has really dropped the ball so far this year. where is the r520 already?!
moku said:Nvidia. LOL. I don't know JACK about graphic cards, but when I purchased mine last year(X800pro) I based it off of my previous card(9800).
I worked great. Why buy another brand? Becuase you can make idiotic little mud-slingers like this?
Really, so not all of this is PR makeup?
It may seem like that, but put yourself in my shoes;Suikoguy said:Thats pretty blind loyaity faith moku,
Every time I buy a new graphics card I evaluate all the options.
But in your choice, the X800 is a good card
Sm3.0? And what kind of performance boost are you talking about? I argue with my brother(PC whiz) about this same shit. "With such and such your game will run about 13fps higher" "So it'll run at 80fps, instead of 67? with everything at maximum" "Yeah"Dr.Guru of Peru said:No, because the other brand will have most your games run better and will have Sm3.0.
Most of it is true.
Oh! My Car! said:Pathetic really, this from a company that refuses to address compatibility problems within their nforce3 chipset and 6800 series gfx cards.
Fight for Freeform said:This is like how I called out all the Sony fans and owned them all at the same time.
HokieJoe said:That said, BOTH companies have been guilty of this kind of stuff. So this is nothing new- just bidness as usual. A few years back, when Nvidia answered ATIÂ’s R300 core with the NV30, I can assure you it wasnÂ’t Nvidia who was laughing- ATI was spanking their arse.
Gantz said:Ever since my Nvidia Geforce 6400 ultra died away back I switched over to ATI and never looked back. Now this is just plain sad. I can't wait till Nvidia dies a horrible death like 3Dfx.
Jewbacca said:That is the most unprofessional thing I have ever seen come out of a large company.
moku said:Sm3.0? And what kind of performance boost are you talking about? I argue with my brother(PC whiz) about this same shit. "With such and such your game will run about 13fps higher" "So it'll run at 80fps, instead of 67? with everything at maximum" "Yeah"
Big fucking deal.
Nerevar said:well, at least back then, ATi wasn't making long powerpoint presentations about how much better than they are.
This is really pathetic. Does NVidia really need to do something like this? Everyone knows ATi is dropping the ball, this corporate mud slinging is as bad as what you see on GAF. Let the trusted websites show the benchmarks and report the news, and consumers will decide on which is the best product.
Fight for Freeform said:This is like how I called out all the Sony fans and owned them all at the same time.
Ninja Scooter said:am i the only one that thinks the building without HDR looks better?
EGM92 said:Why did it die? did you try to RMA the card? I've killed my 6800Ultra & my X800XT, Nvidia sent me a 7800GT but stupid ATI sent me a AIW X800XT card which is buggy and complete crap compared to my stock X800XT.
It's a bit low for Nvidia to kick them while their down but it promotes better quality in products and hell even better competition.
What, from nVidia?Cerebral Palsy said:Reading over that... First thing that came to mind is the word desperation.
Cerebral Palsy said:Reading over that... First thing that came to mind is the word desperation.
dark10x said:What, from nVidia?
If they were coming off of the 5*00 series, I could understand, but their more recent cards have been kicking ATI's ass.