StopMakingSense
Member
And Manafort moves ever so closer to flipping.
I'm convinced he did flip. He doesn't give a shit. Everything is just a paycheck to him. Fuck these morons.
And Manafort moves ever so closer to flipping.
Lol, yes, is.
Well, I guess Wikileaks dropped all pretense.
Man, y'all stanning for them last year look... not so great right now.
deleted
Fedora is unconfirmed.Basically?
Ah okay, tyvm.Article was released on 10th and about how, according Breit, NYT didn't have Jr's mails etc etc.
Basically trying to establish narrative that NYT was lying.
This was before todays story broke.
Source close to Manafort says he didn't read all the way down the email chain
Don't post Breitbart without saying it's Breitbart. I don't wanna gove those fuckers clicks.
Are we allowed to post Breitbart links? I am doing my first one in a legendary thread
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...imes-never-read-russia-email-donald-trump-jr/
Racist liars are not welcome here.
What the fuck are these people talking about? I feel like they live in a separate universe where there are alternative facts... Wait a second...
![]()
*NYT delivers email response by Manafort replying to every paragraph*
So if this was all totally fine and acceptable then why did their whole team spend so much time denying and not disclosing the meeting? If it's totally fine and dandy then what kept Kushner from disclosing? Hmmm
That's so much funnier to read if you follow it up with the Curb Your Enthusiasm theme.
Are we allowed to post Breitbart links? I am doing my first one in a legendary thread
http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...imes-never-read-russia-email-donald-trump-jr/
"High quality person" sounds like a line from a person who has no idea what a genuine compliment sounds like. Was it generated from a robot or something?
Good call on the edit, at first I wasn't sure if you were being serious...Because the dishonest, FAILING fake-news media will use anything and everything to spin a story that reflects negatively on President Trump #MAGA
is what they'd say
This entire timeline is crazy: http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/look-at-the-timeline
June 3rd, 2016: First email contact between Rob Goldstone and Donald Trump Jr. about meeting with Russian government lawyer with damaging information about Hillary Clinton.
June 7th, 2016: Donald J Trump gives speech in which he promises a major speech about Hillary Clintons crimes on June 13th. I am going to give a major speech on probably Monday [June 13th] of next week and were going to be discussing all of the things that have taken place with the Clintons. I think youre going to find it very informative and very, very interesting.
June 8th, 2016: First tweet posted to DCLeaks Twitter account.
June 9th, 2016: Donald Trump, Jr., Jared Kushner and Paul Manafort meet with Natalia Veselnitskaya. Trump agreed to take the meeting after being told by Trump associate Rob Goldstone that Veselnitskaya had damaging information about Hillary Clinton which came from a Russian government operation to help his father Donald J. Trump.
June 12th, 2016: Julian Assange first announces that Wikileaks has Clinton emails which are soon to be released. Wikileaks has a very big year ahead We have emails related to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication.
June 14, 2016: Washington Post publishes first account of hacking of the DNC computer networks, allegedly by hackers working on behalf of the Russian government.
June 15th, 2016: Guccifer 2.0, later identified by US government officials and other private sector analysts as a fictive persona created by Russian intelligence operatives, contacts The Smoking Gun to take credit for hacking the DNC.
June 27th, 2016: First hacked DNC emails posted to DCLeaks website.
Do you think Trump has ever complimented his sons?
Not whom? Is it not the real Assange or Podesta? Can someone clarify for an old man?
Not whom? Is it not the real Assange or Podesta? Can someone clarify for an old man?
Not whom? Is it not the real Assange or Podesta? Can someone clarify for an old man?
The general view of the Donald Trump Jr. email bombshell, according to sources within and close to the White House: no crime, all perception. They know it was politically awful, but have decided there was no real crime.
An extreme example of this approach is Roger Stone, who texted Axios: "The president can turn the tables and dominate the dialogue by ordering the indictment of [James] Clapper, [John] Brennan, [Susan] Rice and [former president Barack] Obama for the wholesale unconstitutional surveillance of Americans... I would seriously arrest [and] perp walk every one of these criminals, making as big a show of it as possible."
I'm pretty sure they posted it to mock how stupid Brietbart is for saying that the New York Times had neither seen or had the emails in question as per the title of that linked story.Racist liars are not welcome here.
Do you think Trump has ever complimented his sons?
Not the real Podesta.
Good call on the edit, at first I wasn't sure if you were being serious...
https://twitter.com/AP/status/884864169077551104BREAKING: Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr. says she doesn't represent the Russian government, only herself.
this is where twitter falls a part for me. He's still reporting? reporting what? I click the conversation and its essentially a bunch of gaf posts "omg" "your killing me"
I only use twitter for work stuff getting new information about products i use for work.
So Assange ACTUALLY TYPED THAT?
My god. Is the stupidity catching?
Assange just admitted he coordinates with trump.
![]()
Saw on Twitter. Lost the page. Sorry to original author.