• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Occult Studies | OT | Esoterica, Folklore, Grimoires, & The Secret History of the World

#Phonepunk#

Banned
9781453712962_p0_v2_s550x406.jpg


Intro: I have always been fascinated with this description of ceremonial magic by Crowley, written in 1904 as the intro to "The Lesser Key of Solomon". He talks like it's almost a sort of mind hacking technique or something. It is interesting to think of this stuff, given how much time we spend in virtual worlds, in the very creations of our own minds. In practice, magic is a holistic treatment, given to the 5 senses, as well as senses unseen.



"It is loftily amusing to the student of Magical literature who is not quite a fool--and rare is such a combination!--to note the criticism directed by the Philistine against the citadel of his science. Truly, since our childhood has ingrained into us not only literal belief in the Bible, but also substantial belief in Alf Laylah wa Laylah, and only adolescence can cure us, we are only too liable, in the rush and energy of dawning manhood, to overturn roughly and rashly both these classics, to regard them both on the same level, as interesting documents from the standpoint of folk-lore and anthropology, and as nothing more.

Even when we learn that the Bible, by a profound and minute study of the text, may be forced to yield up Qabalistic arcana of cosmic scope and importance, we are too often slow to apply a similar restorative to the companion volume, even if we are the luck holders of Burton's veritable edition.

To me, then, it remains to raise the Alf Laylah wa Laylah into its proper place once more.

I am not concerned to deny the objective reality of all "magical" phenomena; if they are illusions, they are at least as real as many unquestioned facts of daily life; and, if we follow Herbert Spencer, they are at least evidence of some cause. 1

Now, this fact is our base. What is the cause of my illusion of seeing a spirit in the triangle of Art?

Every smatterer, every expert in psychology, will answer: "That cause lies in your brain."

English children (pace the Education Act) are taught that the Universe lies in infinite Space; Hindu children, in the Akasa, which is the same thing.

Those Europeans who go a little deeper learn from Fichte, that the phenomenal Universe is the creation of the Ego; Hindus, or Europeans studying under Hindu Gurus, are told, that by Akasa is meant the Chitakasa. The Chitakasa is situated in the "Third Eye," i.e., in the brain. By assuming higher dimensions of space, we can assimilate this fact to Realism; but we have no need to take so much trouble.

This being true for the ordinary Universe, that all sense-impressions are dependent on changes in the brain, 2 we must include illusions, which are after all sense-impressions as much as "realities" are, in the class of "phenomena dependent on brain-changes."

Magical phenomena, however, come under a special sub-class, since they are willed, and their cause is the series of "real" phenomena, called the operations of ceremonial Magic.

These consist of

(1) Sight.
The circle, square, triangle, vessels, lamps, robes, implements, etc.

(2) Sound.
The invocations.

(3) Smell.
The perfumes.

(4) Taste.
The Sacraments.

(5) Touch.
As under (1).

(6) Mind.

The combination of all these and reflection on their significance.

These unusual impressions (1-5) produce unusual brain-changes; hence their summary (6) is of unusual kind. Its projection back into the apparently phenomenal world is therefore unusual.

Herein then consists the reality of the operations and effects of ceremonial magic, 1 and I conceive that the apology is ample, as far as the "effects" refer only to those phenomena which appear to the magician himself, the appearance of the spirit, his conversation, possible shocks from imprudence, and so on, even to ecstasy on the one hand, and death or madness on the other.

But can any of the effects described in this our book Goetia be obtained, and if so, can you give a rational explanation of the circumstances? Say you so?

I can, and will.

The spirits of the Goetia are portions of the human brain.

Their seals therefore represent (Mr. Spencer's projected cube) methods of stimulating or regulating those particular spots (through the eye).

The names of God are vibrations calculated to establish:

(a) General control of the brain., (Establishment of functions relative to the subtle world.)

(b) Control over the brain in detail. (Rank or type of the Spirit.)

(c) Control of one special portion. (Name of the Spirit.)

The perfumes aid this through smell. Usually the perfume will only tend to control a large area; but there is an attribution of perfumes to letters of the alphabet enabling one, by a Qabalistic formula, to spell out the Spirit's name.

I need not enter into more particular discussion of these points; the intelligent reader can easily fill in what is lacking.

If, then, I say, with Solomon:

"The Spirit Cimieries teaches logic," what I mean is:

"Those portions of my brain which subserve the logical faculty may be stimulated and developed by following out the processes called 'The Invocation of Cimieries.'"

And this is a purely materialistic rational statement; it is independent of any objective hierarchy at all. Philosophy has nothing to say; and Science can only suspend judgment, pending a proper and methodical investigation of the facts alleged.

Unfortunately, we cannot stop there. Solomon promises us that we can (1) obtain information; (2) destroy our enemies; (3) understand the voices of nature; (4) obtain treasure; (5) heal diseases, etc. I have taken these five powers at random; considerations of space forbid me to explain all.

(1) Brings up facts from sub-consciousness.

(2) Here we come to an interesting fact. It is curious to note the contrast between the noble means and the apparently vile ends of magical rituals. The latter are disguises for sublime truths. "To destroy our enemies" is to realize the illusion of duality, to excite compassion.

(Ah! Mr. Waite, the world of Magic is a mirror, wherein who sees muck is muck.)

(3) A careful naturalist will understand much from the voices of the animals he has studied long. Even a child knows the difference of a cat's miauling and purring. The faculty may be greatly developed.

(4) Business capacity may be stimulated.

(5) Abnormal states of the body may be corrected, and the involved tissues brought back to tone, in obedience to currents started from the brain.

So for all other phenomena. There is no effect which is truly and necessarily miraculous.

Our Ceremonial Magic fines down, then, to a series of minute, though of course empirical, physiological experiments, and whoso, will carry them through intelligently need not fear the result.

I have all the health, and treasure, and logic, I need; I have no time to waste. "There is a lion in the way." For me these practices are useless; but for the benefit of others less fortunate I give them to the world, together with this explanation of, and apology for, them.

I trust that the explanation will enable many students who have hitherto, by a puerile objectivity in their view of the question, obtained no results, to succeed; that the apology may impress upon our scornful men of science that the study of the bacillus should give place to that of the baculum, the little to the great--how great one only realizes when one identifies the wand with the Mahalingam, up which Brahma flew at the rate of 84,000 yojanas a second for 84,000 mahakalpas, down which Vishnu flew at the rate of 84,000 croces of yojanas a second for 84,000 crores of mahakalpas--yet neither reached an end.

But I reach an end."


Boleskine House,
Foyers, N.B
.

- Aleister Crowley, 1904

http://www.sacred-texts.com/grim/lks/lks03.htm
 
Last edited:

SKM1

Member
I'm very much interested in this topic but the reasons might be unusual. Throughout most of my life I held (implicitly) a view of the world akin scientism. I was very much a materialistic thinker and that might have helped me in my studies of theoretical physics. However I've come to appreciate the symbolic view of the world, and through some studies of psychology and philosophy it became obvious that everything that we see is made by ourselves. The perception of the world itself is a construction of our own.

I remember some time ago I watched this video

It was mind blowing to me (I was high as fuck though). Some time later it became slowly apparent that it is not only the color magenta that does not exist but also everything that we could think about, every color, smell, idea, etc is constructed in our brains. It means that we are actually free to believe whatever we want and the only condition is that it doesn't impair our living (whatever that means, anyways).

Taken to a practical POV there are "tricks" that one can use to change one's perception. Yesterday it came to my attention that if I imagined a "light" that was present in all the universe, I felt some kind of comfort and a reduced sense of despair. It's interesting because this feeling can be switched on and off, and it is consequential in how my decisions are made or how I feel about certain situations.

It is no wonder that people realized this a long time ago but it is usually the case that when a set of ideas are invented we forget their roots, without which we either believe them blindly or mock them and try to do away with them, sometimes to our detriment.

As for the concept of magic itself, it can be, as you quoted, rooted in psychology. This is akin to what Peterson tries to do with his ideas (his as in he has them, not as in he made them), which are mostly religious or mythological (apart from the standard psychology). Look for the root and try to understand why they are valuable. Some people dismiss this search as useless but I wonder.

Another interesting thing is that it might be the case that magic (defined carefully) has a physical basis but our current models don't deal with that. This is kind of far fetched however and I'll hold my judgement for now.
 

#Phonepunk#

Banned
Do you want demons? Because that's how you get demons.
conjuration is one thing you can do, and the Occult talks about it for sure. personally i don't practice any of this, i just love to read about it. to actually do any of these operations takes constant preparation for months and months, fasting, etc. it requires full time dedication, something fine for a medieval wizard who brews potions all day but not for me w a full time job. but nothing wrong with being educated on the past. i love to read and finding rare mystical books is one of my passions.

there is a long history of real world esoteric lore, and it's kind of a cool alternate history that is not presented when you look at the history of civilization from a classical Holy Roman Empire perspective. the invention of the printing press allowed plenty of medieval mystics and alchemists to write down their theories, rituals, and demon crafting (as one might put it). pre-Renaissance practical demonology seemed to be a multi-discipline operation, requiring knowledge of alchemy, astrology, smithing, jewelry crafting, crypography, symbol making, multiple languages, etc.

medieval demonologists have gotten a bad wrap tho, because demons in general have. satan is the ultimate scapegoat. this is why he is a goat. that is kind of where that comes from. the myth of satanic child eating cults, to this day i have still never read any literature that supports that. it is propoganda. from what i can tell true demonology is still tied to Judeo-Christian traditions and the magic is non violent and performance based. the myth of child killing satanists has roots in a Biblical era cult but no evidence of any ideology in the real world. if you have found a work that says otherwise i'd be interested to check it out. most of the stuff i see is, make a circle, use special gems, light candles, draw symbols, chant names, etc. etc. no baby killing.

the medieval demonologists are ironically quite pure and Christian in their approach. first they contacted a familiar or guardian angel, a holy spirit that instructs them in how to do the magic they need, including what fallen spirit to contact and the appropriate words and symbols to use while doing so. the only reason the spirit can be commanded to do whatever magic is because man is closer to God, and God controls all. thus it is seen as a holy exercise. the caster is commanding the spirit under the authority of God himself. the magic comes from God, as all things do, not you. when the demon does what you command them to do, it is because God is making them, cos he is your bro. ask Moses.

the demon is eternally damned, permanently cut off from Heaven, yet God sent his own son, his own flesh and blood, to save Man, to offer that glorious kingdom. Man thus has this naturally higher spiritual level than any demon. this is what makes Demons lowly, this distance from the holy light. it torments them. this is why they try and trick the caster, try to get them to doubt their faith. the caster only need to look to Moses, when similarly confronted by the gods of the Egyptians, he did not waver, he knew his god was above all. watch the Charleton Heston movie if you want to see some magic. ultimately magic is dependent on faith.

most Occult literature is esoteric writing not included in the Bible. think of it as DLC, content that people worked on after, or even during, the rest of the work, but was cut from "final release", be this the Council of Nicea or the public burning of translations not in the official language, or a number of other reasons. there is thousands of years of commentary on the Torah, ignored by the mainstream, which chronicles many many theories and authentic expanded lore on the Hebrew cosmological universe. yet for all the Church did to stamp out heretics and dissent, they were endlessly fascinated with it, and chronicled the Expanded Universe of estoeric Christianity using the imagery we now know as classical Dark Fantasy.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom