V
Vennt
Unconfirmed Member
Needless to say, the driver didn't live through it.
Freeburn.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
- Status
Needless to say, the driver didn't live through it.
Freeburn.
ConfusingJazz
Member
How the hell did that tree stay there?
And is that the whole car, or just the back of it?
And is that the whole car, or just the back of it?
ConfusingJazz
Member
bishoptl said:
That would answer my question about the tree still being there then.
Tommie Hu$tle
Member
That car wouldn't go 155. Besides that car is tied to the tree.
Stuggernaut
Grandma's Chippy
How weak do you people think trees are, especially that kind....I have no idea if it is faked or not, but trees are god damned tough mothers!
ConfusingJazz
Member
Mr Pockets said:
I don't think a skinny tree like that could take a giant chunk of metal traveling at 155 mph.
I got shown that photo by one of those police men who tours schools showing you how dangerous drink driving is, along with loads of other crime scene photos, dont think it is staged. Although, now i think about it, if it was a crime scene, or a scene of a death, there wouldnt be all those random people standing there looking, maybe it was some kind of demonstration.
MrAngryFace
Banned
at 90 mph my car starts to shake a little
AlphaSnake
...and that, kids, was the first time I sucked a dick for crack
It *is* fake. I remember reading about it.
Tommie Hu$tle
Member
calder said:
I think I was the one who posted it about 2500 years ago.
V
Vennt
Unconfirmed Member
Not real? Bah... should have known not to trust an official safety site.
Freeburn.
Freeburn.
No way, there is no way it could compress a car that much without so much as a scratch or lean or anything. Though it does look like there are 2 trees right next to each other, so that would make it a lot easier for the impact.
But where is the rest of the car? Anyone can see it's only about half of a car, just the amount of metal there is evidence of that. It looks like it went head on into the tree(s), I don't see any other pieces in the pictures.
Kind of bizarre photos from that site:
But where is the rest of the car? Anyone can see it's only about half of a car, just the amount of metal there is evidence of that. It looks like it went head on into the tree(s), I don't see any other pieces in the pictures.
Kind of bizarre photos from that site:
V
Vennt
Unconfirmed Member
Ha! Hoax you say? Phooey!
Well, it wasn't a hoax, but neither was it doing 155mph and apparently the driver did survive, possibly the reason the Navy's "Safety" website chose to lie aout the origin and the result of the crash was the fact that she survived regardless of failing to wear her seatbelt
Freeburn.
Well, it wasn't a hoax, but neither was it doing 155mph and apparently the driver did survive, possibly the reason the Navy's "Safety" website chose to lie aout the origin and the result of the crash was the fact that she survived regardless of failing to wear her seatbelt
Freeburn.
Funky Papa
FUNK-Y-PPA-4
That can be a true image, I've seen a few similar accidents.
Take a look at these pics from Portugal, a side crash at high speed. The A3 was obliterated.
http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=1298917&page=1
Notice the untouched airbag sensors.
More proof that it doesn't matter what you drive if you crash at more than 120 km/h. Please guys, slow down
Take a look at these pics from Portugal, a side crash at high speed. The A3 was obliterated.
http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=1298917&page=1
Notice the untouched airbag sensors.
More proof that it doesn't matter what you drive if you crash at more than 120 km/h. Please guys, slow down
andthebeatgoeson
Junior Member
EdLuva said:
Or GTA. God damn, they better remove 50% of the light poles. Let me drive, damn it. Or widen the streets to GTA3 levels. Nothing worse than trying to do any driving missions in Vice City East.
andthebeatgoeson
Junior Member
Freeburn said:Ha! Hoax you say? Phooey!
Well, it wasn't a hoax, but neither was it doing 155mph and apparently the driver did survive, possibly the reason the Navy's "Safety" website chose to lie aout the origin and the result of the crash was the fact that she survived regardless of failing to wear her seatbelt
Freeburn.
Navy? Lying? I refuse to believe.
- Status