Miburou said:Best looking racer, even if these screens don't show it.
Lyte Edge said:I've played the demo, and welll....no.
Lyte Edge said:I've played the demo, and welll....no.
But I want this game more than any other racer.
Lyte Edge said:I've played the demo, and welll....no.
Shogmaster said:PLEEZE don't tell me you are thinking GT4.......
Brandon F said:Demo?
The demo did not show it either.Miburou said:Best looking racer, even if these screens don't show it.
T-1000_Model3 said:
WOW,just amazing. Sega may have taken a long break from arcade racers but they still know their visual stuff,that is simply stunning to look at.
TheGreenGiant said:its not being processed by Sega; and Sega GT for the xbox was a blurry mess. I think the screens look really ordinary. And no cars in any of them. Meh.
That shot of the industrial area is indicative of the quality IMO; very early Ps2, almost Getawayish and we all know what an ugly game that was.
Miburou said:Best looking racer, even if these screens don't show it.
gtmax said:Best track design ever.
No. Better overall-looking games have come out this generation. And yes, this is me playing the "art style" card.
dark10x said:Examples? This has a solid, smooth look that is missing in many racers today (including top notch stuff like RSC2).
Lyte Edge said:GT4 is impressive in its own right just by being on the "weakest" console and still looking amazing. I'd have to go with Rallisport 2, PGR2 (which feels choppy now after Burnout 3 and Outrun 2), and from what I've seen, YES, GT4 as the better looking games. I've only seen Outrun 2 on XBox, BTW.
But that's just dumb graphics talk. Outrun 2 is a hell of a lot more fun than all three of those games put together. I play the demo over and over; cannot wait for the final game.
MAZYORA said:Dude, saying GT4 looks better than Outrun 2 is like saying Tekken 5 looks better than Dead or Alive Ultimate.
xsarien said:From a purely visual - not technical (e.g., how many polygons the game pushes, draw distance, etc.)- standpoint, I think F-Zero looks better.
ge-man said:As much as I love AV and F-Zero GX, I have to say the comparison is a little unfair. The designers didn't have to be grounded in reality, so they were able to design some pretty wacky tracks (Casino City tracks in particular). Outrun is at a disadvantage.
Shompola said:this is imo the best looking racer so far mostly because of the lovely art or whatever it is called.
"its not being processed by Sega; and Sega GT for the xbox was a blurry mess. I think the screens look really ordinary. And no cars in any of them. Meh.
That shot of the industrial area is indicative of the quality IMO; very early Ps2, almost Getawayish and we all know what an ugly game that was."
Another predictable answer by you lol.
is just meh. Amazing/Wow; that shot is not. If this was the same exact image but taken from say SRS; you guys would be crapping all over it.WOW,just amazing. Sega may have taken a long break from arcade racers but they still know their visual stuff,that is simply stunning to look at.
xsarien said:You're calling a racer where the scenery makes jarring changes every minute or so realistic?
xsarien said:No. Better overall-looking games have come out this generation. And yes, this is me playing the "art style" card.
ge-man said:No, it isn't realistic. However, it isn't as far out there as F-zero can be (racing on tubes, jumping huge gaps, taking on tracks upside down).
I don't disagree with your opinion, I just think it's a little unfair, that's all.
xsarien said:From a purely visual - not technical (e.g., how many polygons the game pushes, draw distance, etc.)- standpoint, I think F-Zero looks better.
dark10x said:Bleh, can't say I agree with that AT ALL. F-Zero's visuals were WAYYYY over-hyped...
Miburou said:You haven't replied to my post.