• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Pentagon says Obama's ISIS plan should be Trump's plan.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Donald Trump promised during the campaign to implement a "secret plan" to defeat ISIS, including a pledge to "bomb the hell out of" the terror group in Iraq and Syria.

Now, the Pentagon has given him a secret plan, but it turns out to be a little more than an "intensification" of the same slow and steady approach that Trump derided under the Obama administration, two senior officials who have reviewed the document told NBC News.

The plan calls for continued bombing; beefing up support and assistance to local forces to retake its Iraqi stronghold Mosul and ultimately the ISIS capital of Raqqa in Syria; drying up ISIS's sources of income; and stabilizing the areas retaken from ISIS, the officials say.

Two prominent military strategists told NBC News they fear the plan is insufficient, and won't fulfill Trump's pledges to "totally obliterate ISIS" and do it quickly.

"The current plan to defeat the Islamic State is just like that old saying: Plan B is just, 'Try harder at Plan A,'" said retired Admiral James Stavridis, an NBC News analyst. "We have not come up with new ways of approaching this. I would say the president might want to send that report back to his team to take another hard look."



The irony of the similarities between the Obama plan and the Trump plan is that as a candidate, Trump repeatedly called Obama's ISIS strategy a failure

"We have to be unpredictable starting now. But they're going to be gone," he said in August. "ISIS will be gone if I'm elected president. And they'll be gone quickly."

Pentagon spokesman Navy Capt. Jeff Davis told NBC News that the defense department "delivered a preliminary plan to accelerate the defeat of ISIS" — a plan that is "is serving as the basis for broader discussions with the White House and our interagency partners."

Davis said the preliminary plan sent to the White House is a grand strategy - which places even more emphasis on diplomacy, economics and information than it does on the military. It creates, he says, a framework for more tactical questions to be answered later.

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...looks-lot-obama-s-n735171?cid=sm_npd_nn_tw_ma


Well..... it would have been nice if all military people had been willing to say this was the best approach before the election, assholes!

But... I mean... I guess this is okay? ISIS is losing and staying the course seems fine.
 
By most measurements America is winning and relatively safe from terrorism given how much of it has been prevented. Unfortunately their citizens are scared senseless anyways, which is arguably (but not necessarily) the intended outcome of terrorism.

The government may want that though.
 

Spider from Mars

tap that thorax
Should just leave the plan in a folder labeled "Weak Obama was too much of a coward to do this winner plan!" in a place he will find it.
 

Cyan

Banned
Trump already has a plan:
-call it "radical Islamic terrorism"
-temporary shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until we can figure out what's going on
-quickly cut the head off ISIS
-take their oil

Done. What would he need some pussy liberal Obama plan for?
 
By most measurements America is winning and relatively safe from terrorism given how much of it has been prevented. Unfortunately their citizens are scared senseless anyways, which is arguably (but not necessarily) the intended outcome of terrorism.

The government may want that though.
What really irks me is that the people afraid of terrorism are in the middle of bumfuck nowhere. Yet people in the city are welcoming with open arms (relatively speaking; it is the city after all), and mostly unattainable. No one is gonna bomb your cowfields and farms people.
 

wandering

Banned
The plan to defeat ISIS should be not fucking gutting our State Department.

You cannot defeat terrorism through war alone.
 
Trump already has a plan:
-call it "radical Islamic terrorism"
-temporary shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until we can figure out what's going on
-quickly cut the head off ISIS
-take their oil

Done. What would he need some pussy liberal Obama plan for?
You forgot that he's going to change the mission statement of the military to "we have to start winning wars again".

Can't forget that bit of out-of-the-box thinking that you can only get from a businessman with no political experience.

This man is going to get a lot of our men and women in uniform killed because he doesn't understand or appreciate the political dimensions in any conflict.
 

kadotsu

Banned
Trump already has a plan:
-call it "radical Islamic terrorism"
-temporary shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until we can figure out what's going on
-quickly cut the head off ISIS
-take their oil

Done. What would he need some pussy liberal Obama plan for?

You forgot sneak attack.
 

Zolo

Member
As much as we joke about this, I'm almost positive he can be manipulated this way. It's so pathetic.

I'm only slightly joking. All the dude cares about is what he can do for his interests and how to look good. He'd rather not do a plan that couldn't be mostly attributed to himself (and certainly not to Obama).
 

HeatBoost

Member
"Here's my plan: we arm ISIS. They're bad hombres, don't trust each other. It's very cutthroat, like business, which I understand very well, because I am the best at it. They'll end up infighting, killing each other, we won't have to lift a finger. Obama would have done this, if he wasn't a wiretapping coward!"
 

SerTapTap

Member
By most measurements America is winning and relatively safe from terrorism given how much of it has been prevented. Unfortunately their citizens are scared senseless anyways, which is arguably (but not necessarily) the intended outcome of terrorism.

The government may want that though.

Trump is tired of winning, haven't you heard. Time to get into some incredibly ill advised wars to make that pointless spending increase look reasonable
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom