• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Perpetual Motion Machine Invented

Status
Not open for further replies.
As a Computer Scientist - I know first hand this type of Mechanism should be theoretically possible.

But due to the sheer magnitude of Mechanical Mathematical Precision needed - the project was put aside until computation matched the theoretical levels of raw compute needed to solve
limiting factors - such as weight, materials ect.

Still.. Various attempts had been made - but the main underlying catalyst keeping this project from moving forward was mathematical precision.

Mainly Concise Weight Ratios.

The values and integers/equations to make this vision a reality were so mechanically precise that Computer Scientists rationed the values were
impossible to solve in a timely cost effective manner by raw computing standards - at least until 2033.

And it was speculated, by the time computation reaches the correct raw compute output - a superior mechanism could be built utilizing
one standard weight ratio.

That was when I was studying to become a Computer Scientist 20 years ago.

I noticed this, and revisit his videos from time to time - he has a new project up.

Theoretically. One only need increase instances of this mechanism to create free energy.

With multiple instances of this mechanism working in unison, it would be possible to facilitate an Oscillating Mechanism
to power a car alternator for instance... attached to a car battery - to create free charge which would essentially create free energy.

Could someone kindly remove my previous thread? Thank You.

 
Last edited:
And physics states this is theoretically possible, extremely possible. Particularly once Raw Compute is sufficiently powerful enough
to provide the correct value for weight. The other limiting factors were materials. Bearings, machined at nano-precision as to not obstruct
Oscillating attributes once corroded.

It was projected at a 1 in 183,000,000 chance that someone might figure out the correct ratios on their own without raw compute utilized to discern the correct values required
and in fact create this Engine.

As of now, there is no evidence that this is a hoax, currently.
 
Last edited:
Fake.

First law of thermodynamics immediately negates the possibility of this being real, plus even if you did manage a perfect friction free mechanism and run it in a vacuum to get rid of as much air friction as possible and get it running you wouldn't be able to charge/power anything as that requires additional power, bringing us back to the first law again.
 
Fake.

First law of thermodynamics immediately negates the possibility of this being real, plus even if you did manage a perfect friction free mechanism and run it in a vacuum to get rid of as much air friction as possible and get it running you wouldn't be able to charge/power anything as that requires additional power, bringing us back to the first law again.
Computer Science dictates this is fully mitigated when utilizing superior Material NanoFabrication processing and it is specifically cited in the initial post.

Even ignoring this, the engine is estimated to run at optimal for over 12 hours with inferior machined parts you can buy in store today.

Meaning you will only have to worry about what you've cited after 12 hours of use. One need only create an Oscillating mechanism when obstruction arises to spin this motor during such instances.

So what you've cited clearly ignores that if the correct weight ratios are leveraged a near endless amount of free motion will catalyze the mechanism for no less than 12 hours.

Other variants with incorrect weight perimeters only catalyze motion for less than a minute.

You mention friction multiple times ignoring that this mechanism with inferior friction prone bearings, would still run for 12 hours with the correct weight ratios applied.

Your second issue has been solved countless times, the solution is to scale up and as stated in my post prior - add more instances of this mechanism.
 
Last edited:

6502

Member
So what about electrolysis using granite and other crystal containing stones? Read theory and saw bonkers theory about the great pyramid being a maser based ionosphere charge accumulator .. which is interesting, but the hydrogen being fed by electrolysis is they key and lowest tech part of the theory. Any part being true is staggering to me.

1. Can electrolysis occur without man made electric on earth? Could we really use crystal / stones?

2. Can a maser (microwave laser) create a low resistance path to earth for ionosphere charge to be drawn to ground?

Any boffins about?
 

poppabk

Cheeks Spread for Digital Only Future
Perpetual motion is a theoretical possibility and a practical impossibility.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom