Oh shit, did not know this, will definitely give it a watch, then. Still not getting my hopes up too high, though.Something pretty grim about the director of The Green Knight going from that to this.
Something pretty grim about the director of The Green Knight going from that to this.
He also directed the remake of Pete's Dragon, definitely the best of Disney's slew of remakes. Disney knew the IP wouldn't make for a huge financial hit, so they gave him free reign to make whatever he wanted. He said he wasn't given the same freedom for Peter Pan & Wendy, so I haven't had the highest hopes for it. Still a bit high though. It's David Lowery...Oh shit, did not know this, will definitely give it a watch, then. Still not getting my hopes up too high, though.
Thats the name of the novel.Just noticed the title: "& Wendy". They probably gonna turn her into a girl boss in this version, aren't they?
Is this based on the novel or on the earlier Disney version coz most(all?) other Peter Pan movies didn't include it either.Thats the name of the novel.
Aside from the Lion King remake which made shit loads of money, it sure seems like lots of Disney kids flicks do lousy lately in terms of sales or reviews.
The novel was originally titled Peter And WendyIs this based on the novel or on the earlier Disney version coz most(all?) other Peter Pan movies didn't include it either.
And a quick look up of J.M. Barrie's work, the book is called just Peter Pan also.
Well, you learn something everyday but I have a strong suspicion this title isn't there because the movie's aiming to be very accurate to the novel version(being also based on the 53 animation practically makes that a given).The novel was originally titled Peter And Wendy
Then in 1915 the abridged version was published under the name Peter Pan And Wendy.
No thanks.
They are so creatively bankrupt, you know this got greenlit simply off whoever pitched this saying......"And Wendy" That is the extent of their effort nowadays
Well, you learn something everyday but I have a strong suspicion this title isn't there because the movie's aiming to be very accurate to the novel version(being also based on the 53 animation practically makes that a given).
Cool. Did not know that. I stand corrected in my pitch comment.The novel was originally titled Peter And Wendy
Then in 1915 the abridged version was published under the name Peter Pan And Wendy.
But this is a story about English kids in the nineteen hundreds.Peter Pan was not originally a ginger, that was an adaptation. Tinker bell wss not originally blonde, that was an adaptation. The original book was titled the same as this movie is.
So woke putting a girls name on the book.The novel was originally titled Peter And Wendy
Then in 1915 the abridged version was published under the name Peter Pan And Wendy.
I expected shit tbh. It really doesn't look that bad. I'm excited. I just hope it doesn't focus too much on wendy. I also wanted to be a permanent boy who fought pirates so I'm really there for Pan.Tyrone magnus reviewing a Peter Pan trailer is kinda telling on his own what kind of content creator he is lol
Before this thread goes south because of course it will,
Peter Pan was not originally a ginger, that was an adaptation. Tinker bell wss not originally blonde, that was an adaptation. The original book was titled the same as this movie is.
The only real tangible explicit change is with the lost boys group, which i really am not bothered by. This movies director is very very good, so I'm pretty much gonna give it a shot off of that alone .
Have fun in here yall!
If you're referring to tinker bell, she isn't an English kid.But this is a story about English kids in the nineteen hundreds.
Do black people really give a fuck if this would stay a classic English novel with white folks? do women think it's an affront that the lost boys are boys?
I expected shit tbh. It really doesn't look that bad. I'm excited. I just hope it doesn't focus too much on wendy. I also wanted to be a permanent boy who fought pirates so I'm really there for Pan.
Yes we do. The backlash of this black washed tinkerbell in on full force across the internet.If you're referring to tinker bell, she isn't an English kid.
There were not white English kids in the 1900s anyway.
Instead of asking if black people give af, ask if white people give af about Tinker bell being another color because its a whire person making this movie lol
I never thought of Peter Pan as a north Indian looking character personally (I don’t know where the actor is from - just going based off looks).Gotta say, they nailed the casting for Peter Pan himself.
What next? They should make Batman or Superman black just because they’re fictional?Why the fuck do people give a shit about some fictional characters skin color?(unless its some integral part of the story)
It's being outraged for outrage sake.