PS Store prices aren’t the same for everyone anymore — Sony experiments with dynamic pricing

Jesus fucking Christ.

This is a thing....holy shit. If this rolls out. Wtf
It's already been tried by Amazon and still a thing with Airline and Insurance companies. Probably lots of online stores too, they use your custom profile based on browsing history to target you.

It's trash regardless though.
 
Last edited:
You can set different prices in different parts of the EU, but what you aren't really supposed to be able to do legally is block someone from one part buying from another part. Whether they found ways around that idk.

Practices like offering different prices to different people based on their buying habits, or if they just canceled their sub, or left it in checkout etc. should all be outlawed.
I was fairly sure when I was younger that discriminatory pricing was illegal here in Australia, but looking at it now, I'm not so sure. Either way, it seems shitty to me to be offering discounts to some people and not others.
 
Dear Sony's Ai deity Mr. KutaragAI, I know you're scanning this. My PSN profile is Scrawnton and I REALLY hate JRPGs. I'll never buy them. Even if they're 90% off. Just. Not. Doing. It. Don't even bother, you won't get me.
 
Buy nothing on sale. If it's not worth your time at full price, it's not worth your time at a discount rate.
c5iDbbxgzZr03B02.jpeg
 
It wont matter bc nobody cares about the microsoft pc.they left the console industry and now have to play by pc rules and paid online wont fly there bc nobody else does it.

On console everyone does it that has ppl actually still buying the console.
But why can't Playstation have free online anymore? It used to be a thing
 
Ugh, I'm in the usa and mine expired about about a month ago. I really only used it for monthly games and cloud saves. It finally offered me a discount last night but 0 discount on a year of essentials . Plus was around $95 but for $5 more I was able to get prem for $105 a year. I wouldn't even bother with ps+ but I hate how they block cloud saves behind it, I play too many long jrpgs to risk losing my save files.
 
I'm not sure im understanding. How is this compared to typical regional pricing?
They are offering different prices within the same region. If it's highly specific to individuals your neighbour if say is poor might see better offer/discounts than you because they detect you can afford it and likely a gaming addict.
 
What does this mean? Dynamic pricing, what? They fleece those willing to pay more but they'll offer it me cheaper because I historically pay less?
That sounds surviving more than greed to me. Surviving business operate at fear from scarcity and at the opposite side of spectrum, to generate infinite cash without any real harm they pretend it's happening to them.
 
For me:

WWE -67%
Warhammer -50%
Civilization -35%
KCD 2 -40%
Mafia -0%

Seems… Great 👍

Maybe they see that I no longer buy anything?
Still won't buy anything though so can't say it's working. I want my games on PC now.
 
Last edited:
I found that the Meta Quest store does this when I logged into my daughter's Quest 2 and went to the store. She had games displayed as on sale that were not in my device. I bugged support to the point that they issued me two $25 store credits. I was still irritated.
 
Why are people upset that they're trialling cheaper prices? What am I missing?

Hopefully it takes off cause the pricing right now is a rip-off.
 
Last edited:
We'll see what they do, but I have no faith whatsoever this will be done for my benefit.

Even if they implement in an enticing way early on...do people really not think enshittification phase won't happen after people get hooked on it.

Game Pass used to be an amazing deal, now it isn't after just a few years. Sony has shareholders too, the goal is to get you to spend more.
 
Is the price ever going above the MSRP or are we only looking at who is getting more of a discount but nobody is paying more than MSRP?
The very concept of an MSRP is being eroded by this practice. MSRP doesn't really exist anymore, only in name and on paper. Algorithms charge whatever they know they can get away with, and they also know how to cashmaxx you, they have a long list of manipulation tactics for that.
 
I was fairly sure when I was younger that discriminatory pricing was illegal here in Australia, but looking at it now, I'm not so sure. Either way, it seems shitty to me to be offering discounts to some people and not others.
When you're selling physical goods, you are always in limited supply. Because you're in limited supply, you cannot freely or "randomly" shift prices around just to sell some of this stuff - you'd hurt your bottom line if, for example, you'd sell off half your inventory for a heavy discount when you could've found a "better" buyer instead. With the glorious all-digital future though these limits no longer apply. As long as you're somewhat confident the customer who gave you 60 would have never bought it for 80, you're making loads of money.
 
Why are people upset that they're trialling cheaper prices? What am I missing?

Hopefully it takes off cause the pricing right now is a rip-off.
If this means cheaper games by default for people like myself who barely buy anything at all, to lure me in. Then bring it! 👍

And if it's just a short experiment to see how much a lower price affects the sales numbers, then it's still good since they're experimenting with lowering prices…

But I guess the problem is that they could also experiment with increasing prices…

And then it's bad bad bad idea! Because the loyal day 1 fans will always be there no matter what. That could show someone with a calculator that it's okay to increase the standard price.

I already have to pay $95 for a AAA 1st party release on PlayStation store. It's been accepted by the market from what I can tell, it's been like that for at least a year. 899SEK. And as a result I no longer buy games on PlayStation, they completely lost me, I've fully accepted to wait for a late Steam sale. So good luck increasing the price!
 
If this means cheaper games by default for people like myself who barely buy anything at all, to lure me in. Then bring it! 👍

And if it's just a short experiment to see how much a lower price affects the sales numbers, then it's still good since they're experimenting with lowering prices…

But I guess the problem is that they could also experiment with increasing prices…

And then it's bad bad bad idea! Because the loyal day 1 fans will always be there no matter what. That could show someone with a calculator that it's okay to increase the standard price.

I already have to pay $95 for a AAA 1st party release on PlayStation store. It's been accepted by the market from what I can tell, it's been like that for at least a year. 899SEK. And as a result I no longer buy games on PlayStation, they completely lost me, I've fully accepted to wait for a late Steam sale. So good luck increasing the price!
I buy the very occasional game brand new, GTAVI will be one of those. But if I'm not getting it at launch then I tend to wait for deep sales so devs are only missing out in the end.
 
I buy the very occasional game brand new, GTAVI will be one of those. But if I'm not getting it at launch then I tend to wait for deep sales so devs are only missing out in the end.
For full-priced games, this year I've bought Stellar Blade on Steam. That's it.

Means I may struggle to find games to vote on for GOTY awards. But who cares? I can't say I'm suffering, I play patched games, at half the price or less. For day 1 I use Gamepass.
 
There is of course a danger with offering special discounted prices to people who have a high Scrooge score in the algorithm: it encourages everyone to cultivate and protect their Scrooge score.
 
Why are people upset that they're trialling cheaper prices? What am I missing?

Hopefully it takes off cause the pricing right now is a rip-off.

Hopefully it DOESN'T take off.

For example:

Player 1 - Will 100% buy The Last of Us 8 Remastered for $80. No discount from Sony.
Player 2 - Has a history of not buying many 1st party titles, however, seems to enjoy that genre. Apply slight discount to push the person to buy it and enter the eco-system even more.

That's just an example, but no doubt it'll be something like that. It's just another way of Sony pushing people to lock into their eco-system.
 
There is of course a danger with offering special discounted prices to people who have a high Scrooge score in the algorithm: it encourages everyone to cultivate and protect their Scrooge score.
Depends how it's balanced. If dynamic discounts based on purchase behavior gets you to buy more games then it'll work as intended. And your "Scrooge score" will naturally go down and prices will dynamically increase until you go back to not buy anything again.
 
Last edited:
Lube up, because you're about to get fucked.
By getting a 17% discount?

I get that it's annoying if somebody gets a discount and another person doesn't but what's being replicated is a "limited quantity" sale in the physical world. They're more likely to target those with high networking effects of getting friends interested in buying the game or those more prone to mtx within the games.

The good thing about the game industry (vs airlines and insurance) is that there is a known RRP price cap for games. Personalised pricing is annoying though and the stalking for data is something I've always hated.
 
Last edited:
But Steam itself is not a walled garden like PsN. You can buy keys anywhere.
On PS you can buy discs from anywhere at varying prices unlike PC too. He was only mentioning that GoG or Epic offering a 30% discount compared to steam doesn't seem to help convince people to buy from Steam alternatives. Doesn't really have anything to do with that "walled garden" comparison you made.
 
Top Bottom