Decently long article, worth a read in whole if you're interested.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...t-on-puerto-rico-debt-days-before-debt-cliff/
The house passed this bill last week and is now on holiday, had the senate made any amendments to the bill it would have been required to be sent back to the house which won't be back in session until next week whereas PR would have defaulted in two days.
It won't prevent them from defaulting but it protects them from lawsuits from creditors
An op-ed PR's governor wrote:
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/29/puer...n-more-than-1-billion-in-debt-commentary.html
I already make my posts too big as it is so just some snippets.
And the bill itself and its summary.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/5278
Honestly I'm kinda surprised our government managed to hammer together a deal considering how split both sides of the aisle were about this.
Any PR residents here with opinions on this?
Checked and didn't see a thread, lock if old
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...t-on-puerto-rico-debt-days-before-debt-cliff/
This bill was kinda do or die.Rescue legislation aimed at helping Puerto Rico address its mounting fiscal crisis cleared Congress Wednesday, two days before the U.S. territory is set to default on roughly $2 billion in debt payments.
The bill passed by the Senate on a 68-to-30 vote opens a path for an orderly restructuring of the islands $72 billion in bond debt while creating a new federally appointed fiscal oversight board. It passed the House earlier this month, and President Obama has said he will sign it.
Obviously, the bill isnt perfect, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said Wednesday, before arguing that it offers Puerto Rico the best chance to return to financial stability and economic growth over the long term so we can help prevent another financial crisis like this in the future.
The passage of the bill the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management, and Economic Stability Act, or PROMESA was in doubt earlier this week, and, had it failed Wednesday, the anticipated missed payments likely would have roiled credit markets and sparked creditor lawsuits.The opposition did not fall neatly along party lines. Democrats raised a host of objections to the bill, including over the anti-democratic nature of the oversight board, the relatively arcane restructuring process and a provision that could lower the minimum wage for young workers. Some Republicans, meanwhile, found some provisions unfair to creditors and feared the rescue bill could set a precedent for fiscally troubled states to seek federal intervention.For everyone who says you cant do hard things its a reminder than you can do hard things, Lew said in an interview especially, he added, when youre faced with the alternative of 3.5 million Americans being plunged into chaos.
The real alternative was not a better bill, he said. The real alternative was no bill.As the clock winds down toward the July 1 deadline, there is considerable confusion about Puerto Ricos cash position. Many creditors and analysts believe the territory has enough cash to at least make the $300 million or so in interest payments on Puerto Ricos general obligation bonds, generally considered one of the safest bonds. But other analysts say that even if Puerto Rico could make interest payments, failure to make the principal payments coming due would still constitute a default and would leave the islands coffers virtually empty.
Even if the island scraped together $300 million for interest payments now, there would be an additional $2 billion of interest payments due over the next fiscal year. In addition, Puerto Rico usually receives more cash toward the end of its fiscal year, so any recent influx of cash would not recur until next spring.
Maybe theyre trying to show good faith, said Susheel Kirpalani, a bankruptcy expert and partner at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan representing one category of bondholders. But, he added, in restructuring, the first rule is cash is king. To pay interest would be 180 degrees opposite of Restructuring 101.Puerto Ricos fiscal crisis goes deeper than its unsustainable public debt: Its economy has been stagnant for years, and its population has been steadily fleeing to the U.S. mainland eroding the territorial tax base and threatening the delivery of basic services. More than a third of territorial government revenues are now spent on debt service.
There can be no economic growth in Puerto Rico until the debt is restructured, so the legislation is an absolutely essential first step, said Eric LeCompte, executive director of Jubilee USA, a network of mainly religious advocacy groups focused on global debt relief. But I think in terms of the real issues facing the island, we are just getting to the end of the beginning. This is not the beginning of the end.In Puerto Rico, there are still many concerns about the legislation, which was inspired in part by the federal control board Congress imposed on Washington, D.C., from 1995 to 2000. Sergio Marxuach, public policy director at the San Juan-based Center for a New Economy, says that in the Districts case the federal government later took over a sizable chunk of unfunded pension obligations, whereas Puerto Rico faces about $43 billion of unfunded pension liabilities once it gets past its $72 billion or so of other debts.If Democrats had written this bill, it would be very different than what we are voting on today, Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) said Wednesday. But Im going to vote for passage of this bill because we must help Puerto Rico before July 1st. Otherwise we turn that island . . . over to the hedge funds, and theyll sue them to death.Also vowing to oppose the bill was Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders (Vt.), who said he would do everything I can to defeat a horrific bill. An added complication was a bipartisan group of senators representing coal-producing states who said they would oppose closing debate on the Puerto Rico bill unless they won assurances from McConnell that the Senate would act to shore up health and pension funds for mine workers.Were not going to let Puerto Rico go off the cliff here, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) said Monday. Its too important.
The house passed this bill last week and is now on holiday, had the senate made any amendments to the bill it would have been required to be sent back to the house which won't be back in session until next week whereas PR would have defaulted in two days.
It won't prevent them from defaulting but it protects them from lawsuits from creditors
An op-ed PR's governor wrote:
http://www.cnbc.com/2016/06/29/puer...n-more-than-1-billion-in-debt-commentary.html
I already make my posts too big as it is so just some snippets.
PROMESA is a mixed bag. On the one hand, it provides the tools needed to protect the people of Puerto Rico from disorderly actions taken by the creditors. The immediate stay granted by the bill on all litigation is of the utmost importance in this moment. Most importantly, the authority to adjust our debt stock provides the legal tools to complete a broad restructuring and route Puerto Rico's revitalization.
But facing the upsides and downsides of the bill, it gives Puerto Rico no true choice at this point in time.
On July 1, 2016, Puerto Rico will default on more than $1 billion in general obligation bonds, the island's senior credits protected by a constitutional lien on revenues. Creditors and bond insurers have initiated multiple lawsuits and last week, hedge funds filed an injunction before the Southern District of New York claiming the "absolute highest priority" over government resources, including those needed for essential public services. That complaint minces no words and states that, in "times of scarcity," bondholders should be paid before essential services.
No amount of contingency planning can shield us from the fallout of the defaults in the coming days; no amount of contingency planning will replace the necessity of a debt restructuring regime. We have suffered a decade of economic contraction. We are facing a government less capable of providing the services which the public needs.
And the bill itself and its summary.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/5278
Definitely not the greatest bill but they didn't really seem to have a choice.This bill addresses Puerto Rico's debt by establishing an oversight board, a process for restructuring debt, and expedited procedures for approving critical infrastructure projects.
The bill establishes the Financial Oversight and Management Board to oversee the development of budgets and fiscal plans for Puerto Rico's instrumentalities and government. The board may issue subpoenas, certify voluntary agreements between creditors and debtors, seek judicial enforcement of its authority, and impose penalties.
The board's responsibilities include:
approving the governor's fiscal plan;
approving annual budgets;
enforcing budgets and ordering any necessary spending reductions; and
reviewing laws, contracts, rules, regulations, or executive orders for compliance with the fiscal plan.
The bill establishes procedures and requirements for Puerto Rico to restructure its debt and designates the board as the representative of the debtor. The board may initiate a procedure for debt restructuring and submit or modify a plan of adjustment.
The establishment of the board operates as an automatic stay of creditor actions to enforce claims against the government of Puerto Rico.
The bill amends the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 to permit the governor, subject to the approval of the board, to designate a time period of no more than four years during which employers in Puerto Rico may pay certain employees less than the national minimum wage.
The bill establishes a Revitalization Coordinator to designate critical infrastructure projects that meet specified requirements. Critical projects approved by the oversight board are eligible for an expedited permitting process.
The board shall divide creditors into pools based on the characteristics of the debt, and each pool may vote on a plan to restructure the debt. If at least two-thirds of the outstanding principal amount of a pool agrees with the plan, the pool may file a petition in court to bind the dissenting bondholders to the modification.
Honestly I'm kinda surprised our government managed to hammer together a deal considering how split both sides of the aisle were about this.
Any PR residents here with opinions on this?
Checked and didn't see a thread, lock if old