• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Someone is shooting and stabbing homeless men

Little Mac

Gold Member
TBH the first thing I thought of was ...

HardTarget_1993_poster.jpg
 

DeafTourette

Perpetually Offended
Is that what this movie about?
They take homeless people and tell them they can win money if they survive being hunted by wealthy men. Yancy Butler (i used to think she was the SHIZNEY!) needs help looking for her dad and she meets Chance (Jean-Claude) ... He gets caught and made to play the hunt game... It was the best of his movies after Bloodsport
 
Saw this on the news this morning when I woke up.

Hope they catch this fucker asap. Actually no I hope he encounters a sleeping homeless guy with a fully loaded shotgun

This is the worst possible response.


Instead of asking,

"Why are there people living on the streets" or "is it still okay to let people sleep on the streets in this vulnerable position" you now want people who can't manage their own lives to sleep in public with firearms. I almost admire your libertarian love of freedom, but no that isn't the answer.
 

Prison Mike

Banned
This is the worst possible response.


Instead of asking,

"Why are there people living on the streets" or "is it still okay to let people sleep on the streets in this vulnerable position" you now want people who can't manage their own lives to sleep in public with firearms. I almost admire your libertarian love of freedom, but no that isn't the answer.
And what is the answer
Claro Que Black Woman GIF by iOne Digital
 
And what is the answer
Claro Que Black Woman GIF by iOne Digital

Not letting homeless people live on the streets. Temporary housing. Declare a state of emergency and make airbnb rentals comply with the same rules as other short term rentals. Place a high tax on unoccupied rentals to be used to pay for mental hospitals and temporary housing. I mean it doesn't take a rocket scientist, it just takes will. We have all the will in the world to deal with other matters, but for the homeless? Nothing.

You should not be allowed to sleep on the streets, period. Attempting to do so, or doing so by accident should result in you being swiftly picked up by law enforcement and relocated to a place that is indoors. We could easily fix this problem if it was important to us as a society. Instead we like to parade our homeless around town and watch them die slowly as an example of how little society cares.
 

Prison Mike

Banned
Not letting homeless people live on the streets. Temporary housing. Declare a state of emergency and make airbnb rentals comply with the same rules as other short term rentals. Place a high tax on unoccupied rentals to be used to pay for mental hospitals and temporary housing. I mean it doesn't take a rocket scientist, it just takes will. We have all the will in the world to deal with other matters, but for the homeless? Nothing.

You should not be allowed to sleep on the streets, period. Attempting to do so, or doing so by accident should result in you being swiftly picked up by law enforcement and relocated to a place that is indoors. We could easily fix this problem if it was important to us as a society. Instead we like to parade our homeless around town and watch them die slowly as an example of how little society cares.
Good point well made sir
Great Gatsby Movie GIF by Sony
 
There's a question of providing shelter for the homeless who want it. That's the easier topic

The more difficult one is what to do about those who DON'T want shelter. It's kinda of hard to find (at least with the time and effort I can afford right now) what the New York State and New York City laws are exactly, but my understanding is that you can't force a homeless person into a shelter against his/her will. This got so bad that at one point former Governor Andrew Cuomo had to sign an executive order to forcibly shelter homeless people -- even against their will -- under certain conditions; from what I remember it was weather-based. (As in: "Temperatures below freezing," from what I remember.)

There will always be a subset of the homeless population that will be on the streets no matter what.
 
There's a question of providing shelter for the homeless who want it. That's the easier topic

The more difficult one is what to do about those who DON'T want shelter. It's kinda of hard to find (at least with the time and effort I can afford right now) what the New York State and New York City laws are exactly, but my understanding is that you can't force a homeless person into a shelter against his/her will. This got so bad that at one point former Governor Andrew Cuomo had to sign an executive order to forcibly shelter homeless people -- even against their will -- under certain conditions; from what I remember it was weather-based. (As in: "Temperatures below freezing," from what I remember.)

There will always be a subset of the homeless population that will be on the streets no matter what.

You can force them to accept accomodations and not live out on the streets as long as you have shelter to offer them. At least that is the case in CA.

You don't have a fundamental right to sleep on the streets. Not only should they be forced off the streets, if they insist on their lifestyle they should be forced into counseling. If you had a son or daughter that decided they wanted to live on the streets and beg for change you wouldn't start getting all libertarian on us and telling us how they had a human right to not contribute to society, live in squalor, while taking advantage of its resources would you? You would do everything you could to prevent your children from living outdoors in a city?
 
You can force them to accept accomodations and not live out on the streets as long as you have shelter to offer them. At least that is the case in CA.

You don't have a fundamental right to sleep on the streets. Not only should they be forced off the streets, if they insist on their lifestyle they should be forced into counseling. If you had a son or daughter that decided they wanted to live on the streets and beg for change you wouldn't start getting all libertarian on us and telling us how they had a human right to not contribute to society, live in squalor, while taking advantage of its resources would you? You would do everything you could to prevent your children from living outdoors in a city?
I think my post was clearly coming at it from a New York perspective.

Who the hell is being libertarian? I wasn't taking a stance, I was stating facts. You went way off the rails with your emotional response.

These past few days, I don't know what the hell is going on, I feel like some people here on GAF are on edge. The jumpiness and frustration from some of the replies.... my god 😂
 
I think my post was clearly coming at it from a New York perspective.

Who the hell is being libertarian? I wasn't taking a stance, I was stating facts. You went way off the rails with your emotional response.

These past few days, I don't know what the hell is going on, I feel like some people here on GAF are on edge. The jumpiness and frustration from some of the replies.... my god 😂

I have this conversation regularly in real life, and the people I argue with are usually otherwise extremely liberal and support lots of big government policies, but at the same time will tactically make libertarian arguments that the homeless deserve freedom not to participate in society in a way that we don't apply to other groups.

I walk by several homeless people and many more tents every time I go to work. I'm mad that anyone thinks its even a question of whether or not we should allow people to live on the streets.
 

Scotty W

Banned
Not letting homeless people live on the streets. Temporary housing. Declare a state of emergency and make airbnb rentals comply with the same rules as other short term rentals. Place a high tax on unoccupied rentals to be used to pay for mental hospitals and temporary housing. I mean it doesn't take a rocket scientist, it just takes will. We have all the will in the world to deal with other matters, but for the homeless? Nothing.

You should not be allowed to sleep on the streets, period. Attempting to do so, or doing so by accident should result in you being swiftly picked up by law enforcement and relocated to a place that is indoors. We could easily fix this problem if it was important to us as a society. Instead we like to parade our homeless around town and watch them die slowly as an example of how little society cares.
There are a few things in here that I am not sure how you would justify. Wouldn’t forcing Airbnb’s to open up incentivize owners to avoid that?

I am also not sure what legal grounds you could use to force someone off of the street. Sure, it is sad, but so are alcoholism, smoking, obesity, divorce, infidelity and many other things, but we don’t ban those.
 
I have this conversation regularly in real life, and the people I argue with are usually otherwise extremely liberal and support lots of big government policies, but at the same time will tactically make libertarian arguments that the homeless deserve freedom not to participate in society in a way that we don't apply to other groups.

I walk by several homeless people and many more tents every time I go to work. I'm mad that anyone thinks its even a question of whether or not we should allow people to live on the streets.
Heads up: I live in a city with LOTS of homeless, too. Full-blown, spread out encampments in public city parks. So you're not the only one who sees/experiences it. It's a complicated subject. There's a lot of mental illness involved and in my city, often the homeless will be a danger to themselves, but more broadly, to the community at large. (Just sign in to your local NextDoor and take a look for yourself, for neighborhood reports of harassment and assault by homeless people... I mean a lot of it is also on the news.)

If you must know, I'm not libertarian about this, at all. I'm not gonna get political, but -- there are real contributing factors for why some homeless stay on the streets. Cops can't do anything (again, coming at it from a perspective of both New York and the city I live in, both of which have seen the number of police and the law enforcement capabilities of police heavily reduced in the last couple of years; both cities have adopted a heavy anti police rhetoric in the past couple of years, so we're paying the price...)

On top of the police being somewhat unable to do anything about it, you have some people that try to claim "autonomy" for the homeless. (As in: a homeless person should remain in the streets if they want to, because they have "autonomy.")

Because of these reasons, among others I'm sure, you generally can't FORCE homeless people off the streets against their will.

So, take your angry emotional energy somewhere else, dude. Specifically, use that energy towards the people that are instituting culture and policies that are making it difficult to get homeless off the streets and get them the treatment and help they need.

EDIT: actually Scotty W Scotty W brought up an absolutely great point in the post immediately above this one. No matter what emotions on any side are, there are all sorts of legal matters to consider...
 
Last edited:

Toots

Gold Member
Hope the fucker gets the grenade in the pants he deserves...

HardTarget6.JPG

(couldn't find the gif of Vandamme winking at the pigeon so this'll have to do)
 
There are a few things in here that I am not sure how you would justify. Wouldn’t forcing Airbnb’s to open up incentivize owners to avoid that?

I am also not sure what legal grounds you could use to force someone off of the street. Sure, it is sad, but so are alcoholism, smoking, obesity, divorce, infidelity and many other things, but we don’t ban those.

Do you have a right to sleep in front of a doorway? Does your right to sleep on the street supersede my right to walk on it?

Sleeping outside is camping. You don't have a legal right to camp wherever you want for an uninterrupted period of time. Even on public land that is maintained for the purpose of camping you have limited rights to use it, and there is a maximum amount of time you are allowed to camp. All the laws are on the books, you just have to actually enforce them.
 
Last edited:

Ionian

Member
Two of the homeless men were killed. One was burned as he died.

This used to happen constantly on a main st. here to homeless people. One dude was also doused and set on fire by a load of scumbags. He was asleep in the doorway of a closed shop for shelter.

Violence was common place to homeless people, groups formed to support them to make sure they were safe. However, incidents still happened by drunken assholes as the volunteers couldn't be everywhere at once.

Sickening shit. Pure and utter fucking SCUMBAGS.

Thankfully with cameras I think they caught the culprits for that and they were prosecuted. Still the dude was set on fire, was massive public uproar over the protection of the homeless.

EDIT: Looking it up again. A link. This was commonplace.

 

poodaddy

Member
Not letting homeless people live on the streets. Temporary housing. Declare a state of emergency and make airbnb rentals comply with the same rules as other short term rentals. Place a high tax on unoccupied rentals to be used to pay for mental hospitals and temporary housing. I mean it doesn't take a rocket scientist, it just takes will. We have all the will in the world to deal with other matters, but for the homeless? Nothing.

You should not be allowed to sleep on the streets, period. Attempting to do so, or doing so by accident should result in you being swiftly picked up by law enforcement and relocated to a place that is indoors. We could easily fix this problem if it was important to us as a society. Instead we like to parade our homeless around town and watch them die slowly as an example of how little society cares.
So your solutions boil down to telling people how to conduct their business with regards to landowners who utilize income producing properties as their main source of income, and even going so far as to punish them with additional taxes and fees on top of the unbelievable amount they already get in this business if they can't turn a unit quick enough and get it rented out again?

Another person who assumes all rental owners are rich.....Christ man. You people are squeezing us to fuckin death with all these fees and regulations. Way things are going, you won't have any private landowners soon, it'll all be owned and administered by wealthy Chinese landowners and the US government, and trust me you don't want that. For a look on what that does to property values, have a gander at Canada.

You can not just force private property owners to shoulder the burden of fixing the homeless problem. I get wanting to help, hell I wanna help, but I wanna help in my own way, not by being forced to surrender my property to vagrants for the potential of property damage, vandalism, and illegal drug use and dealings and the violence that comes with it. If you declare this state of emergency and I place four homeless people in one of my rentals, then who pays me for my time? Who covers the cleaning fee? Who covers the inevitable property damage? Who goes to the town council to vouch for me when the neighborhood complains about the drug smells and the loud noise complaints on my property? Who compensates me for my lost equity?

You think you've got it all figured out, but your entire solution to the problem is, help one demographic who couldn't help themselves by absolutely fucking over the demographic who did.

If you don't realize how fucked and ironic that is, then I'm wasting my time.
 

Ionian

Member
Do you have a right to sleep in front of a doorway? Does your right to sleep on the street supersede my right to walk on it?

Sleeping outside is camping. You don't have a legal right to camp wherever you want for an uninterrupted period of time. Even on public land that is maintained for the purpose of camping you have limited rights to use it, and there is a maximum amount of time you are allowed to camp. All the laws are on the books, you just have to actually enforce them.

Ah fuck off, look at my link. Who deserves that?

Did he deserve that? Homeless or not? Even camping? Plenty of homeless people (new and old) camped across the city before/during and after the recession at the time. Some next to main roads, this was a public main St that is world famous.

There was one guy that was murdered and came from a rich family. He inherited properties but had mental issues and refused to live in them and preferred sleeping on the St. After the scum couldn't exploit him for more money (they had taken it) they eventually murdered him as they could no longer grift off his wealth.

Get a grip.

EDIT: I worked around these areas, not as a helper. Just my job (nightshift) was located there. It was constant the reports and the good people that spent their nights helping them. You don't CHOOSE that life for no reason.
 
Last edited:

12Goblins

Lil’ Gobbie
I have this conversation regularly in real life, and the people I argue with are usually otherwise extremely liberal and support lots of big government policies, but at the same time will tactically make libertarian arguments that the homeless deserve freedom not to participate in society in a way that we don't apply to other groups.

I walk by several homeless people and many more tents every time I go to work. I'm mad that anyone thinks its even a question of whether or not we should allow people to live on the streets.
bro why are you making this political when it's a thread about a serial killer killing homeless people
 

Scotty W

Banned
Do you have a right to sleep in front of a doorway? Does your right to sleep on the street supersede my right to walk on it?

Sleeping outside is camping. You don't have a legal right to camp wherever you want for an uninterrupted period of time. Even on public land that is maintained for the purpose of camping you have limited rights to use it, and there is a maximum amount of time you are allowed to camp. All the laws are on the books, you just have to actually enforce them.
You are making a few arguments at the same time which are somewhat incompatible.

First you argued that there should be an absolute ban on homelessness. But now you are conflating that with sleeping in a walkway, and also conflating that with a tent city.

We have strayed from the original topic, are the homeless who are being murdered sleeping in doorways or on busy sidewalks? Doubtful. Why shouldn’t they be allowed to sleep in alleys, or like a guy in my hometown, refuse to go into a shelter and freeze to death sleeping in a park bench at -40 C?
 
Ah fuck off, look at my link. Who deserves that?

Did he deserve that? Homeless or not? Even camping? Plenty of homeless people (new and old) camped across the city before/during and after the recession at the time. Some next to main roads, this was a public main St that is world famous.

There was one guy that was murdered and came from a rich family. He inherited properties but had mental issues and refused to live in them and preferred sleeping on the St. After the scum couldn't exploit him for more money (they had taken it) they eventually murdered him as they could no longer grift off his wealth.

Get a grip.

EDIT: I worked around these areas, not as a helper. Just my job (nightshift) was located there. It was constant the reports and the good people that spent their nights helping them. You don't CHOOSE that life for no reason.

He clearly didn't deserve it. However, this seems inevitable to me in a society where you have a lot of people that are very visibly vulnerable and accessible the way homeless are.

I'm not blaming the homeless. They need help, and letting them live on the streets is not helping them.
 

Ionian

Member
So your solutions boil down to telling people how to conduct their business with regards to landowners who utilize income producing properties as their main source of income, and even going so far as to punish them with additional taxes and fees on top of the unbelievable amount they already get in this business if they can't turn a unit quick enough and get it rented out again?

Another person who assumes all rental owners are rich.....Christ man. You people are squeezing us to fuckin death with all these fees and regulations. Way things are going, you won't have any private landowners soon, it'll all be owned and administered by wealthy Chinese landowners and the US government, and trust me you don't want that. For a look on what that does to property values, have a gander at Canada.

You can not just force private property owners to shoulder the burden of fixing the homeless problem. I get wanting to help, hell I wanna help, but I wanna help in my own way, not by being forced to surrender my property to vagrants for the potential of property damage, vandalism, and illegal drug use and dealings and the violence that comes with it. If you declare this state of emergency and I place four homeless people in one of my rentals, then who pays me for my time? Who covers the cleaning fee? Who covers the inevitable property damage? Who goes to the town council to vouch for me when the neighborhood complains about the drug smells and the loud noise complaints on my property? Who compensates me for my lost equity?

You think you've got it all figured out, but your entire solution to the problem is, help one demographic who couldn't help themselves by absolutely fucking over the demographic who did.

If you don't realize how fucked and ironic that is, then I'm wasting my time.

Brilliant post, I was always advised that I'd be treated like a scumbag as I rented out a house I bought.

I was always fair, went above and beyond with helping even when they are blatantly in the wrong. (An example: "we came home at 3 in the morning and had no key so called a locksmith. You pay!")

Another example, everyone loves a garden. I tell them all keep it the way it is and return it to me as such. When it comes down to some (not all leaving) and you say they didn't look after the property and I'll charge half to fix what I have to pay to fix their neglect? SCUMBAG LANDLORD! BUT WE PLANTED FLOWERS! Just tell them I never asked for flowers, I wanted it back the same minus wear and tear.

Unfortunately for those types, I know their contract backwards. Same one they received in writing as per government law (it's written by the actual government as to their obligations both ways).

I crack a beer can open and laugh when they leave. I always lost out financially but they all seem to think the place wouldn't exist only for them. Nearly always the same. NEARLY. There are decent people that let out properties but there and are pure scum but eventually you do wonder why you bothered being nice.
 
Last edited:

Ionian

Member
He clearly didn't deserve it. However, this seems inevitable to me in a society where you have a lot of people that are very visibly vulnerable and accessible the way homeless are.

I'm not blaming the homeless. They need help, and letting them live on the streets is not helping them.

You're talking out of your ass and from inexperience.

I stated mine. What is yours? Seldom I get this annoyed but you're seriously out of your depth on this topic unless you could explain why you think this way, from your own experience?
 

ParaSeoul

Member
There's a question of providing shelter for the homeless who want it. That's the easier topic

The more difficult one is what to do about those who DON'T want shelter. It's kinda of hard to find (at least with the time and effort I can afford right now) what the New York State and New York City laws are exactly, but my understanding is that you can't force a homeless person into a shelter against his/her will. This got so bad that at one point former Governor Andrew Cuomo had to sign an executive order to forcibly shelter homeless people -- even against their will -- under certain conditions; from what I remember it was weather-based. (As in: "Temperatures below freezing," from what I remember.)

There will always be a subset of the homeless population that will be on the streets no matter what.
Move out of big cities with ridiculous rent costs
 

MaestroMike

Gold Member


Man arrested after shootings of homeless people in D.C., New York​


A man was arrested in the District early Tuesday after shootings that left two homeless people dead and three wounded in D.C. and New York City, according to authorities.

About 5:40 a.m., D.C. police tweeted that the man was in custody and was being interviewed at the city’s homicide branch.

The man’s name was not immediately made public and charges had not been filed as of late Tuesday morning.

No further information about the details of the arrest was immediately available.

The arrest came the day after the New York and D.C. police departments warned vulnerable residents to seek shelter, distributing fliers with a picture of the suspect as the cities’ mayors and police leaders held a joint news conference to ask for the public’s help.

On Tuesday, D.C. Mayor Muriel E. Bowser (D) issued a statement acknowledging “this experience has been especially scary for our residents experiencing homelessness.”

New York Mayor Eric Adams (D), in the same statement, said the gunman “targeted those experiencing homelessness with no regard for life,” adding that he is “now off the streets.”

“People experiencing homelessness have many worries to cope with every day,” New York City Police Commissioner Keechant Sewell said. “Tonight, they will have one less.”

The attacks targeting unhoused people began in the District at around 4 a.m. on March 3 in the 1100 block of New York Avenue NE — a lonely stretch of a major thoroughfare near one of the city’s homeless shelters. The victim, whose injuries were not life-threatening, told police he was shot in the back and right shoulder as he slept. Another shooting followed on March 8, when a man was shot once in the hands and face around 1:20 a.m. in the 1700 block of H Street NE outside a grocery store.

The first fatality came the next day. On March 9 at around 2:50 a.m., a man encamped in the 400 block of New York Avenue NE — blocks from where the first man was shot the previous week — died after he was shot and stabbed and his tent was set on fire, according to police.

The violence then shifted to New York. On March 12, a 38-year-old man was shot in the arm at around 4:30 a.m. while sleeping near the Holland Tunnel. About 90 minutes later, police said a homeless man was found 15 blocks away in a sleeping bag, shot in the head and neck. He died at the scene.

The string of violent incidents in which homeless people were targeted in two of the East Coast’s major cities struck fear among unhoused people and their advocates. Both New York and the District have enacted controversial programs to address homelessness in recent months — Bowser clearing longtime homeless encampments near Union Station and New York Mayor Eric Adams (D) attempting to remove homeless people from subways.

Jesse Rabinowitz, senior manager for policy and advocacy at D.C. outreach organization Miriam’s Kitchen, said Monday that it should not take a killer for people to care about those who are homeless.

“The solution to all of these problems is housing,” he said.

Amanda Chesney, executive director of housing and homeless services for Catholic Charities DC — operator of the men’s shelter on New York Avenue near where two of the violent incidents unfolded — said in an interview Tuesday that news of the arrest was welcome.

Attacks on unhoused people are a reminder that “sleeping on the street is not safe,” Chesney said.

“It was a scary incident,” she said. “The residents we talked to were very concerned about it. There will be a big sigh of relief that he was apprehended.”

This story is developing and will be updated.

 
Last edited:
You're talking out of your ass and from inexperience.

I stated mine. What is yours? Seldom I get this annoyed but you're seriously out of your depth on this topic unless you could explain why you think this way, from your own experience?

Would you want your son or daughter to live like that?
 

Ionian

Member
You’re suppose to provide for the homeless not kill them.
Kill Me Smh GIF

People here do try, unfortunately they are amazingly vulnerable.


This place is famous for it and work on a 'no questions asked' basis. You could be renting and poor but you get the same treatment, solid meals and food packages. The guy who speaks about it (main lad, a monk) is an absolute hero.

NOBODY is ever turned away, no matter your circumstance. Absolute legends.
 

Ionian

Member
Would you want your son or daughter to live like that?

You're really reaching here. Had a cousin that died on the streets after getting hooked on heroin, was even part of a documentary on heroin addiction that was part of a public broadcast.

So let me ask you again, "I stated mine. What is yours? Seldom I get this annoyed but you're seriously out of your depth on this topic unless you could explain why you think this way, from your own experience?".

Can you?
 
You're really reaching here. Had a cousin that died on the streets after getting hooked on heroin, was even part of a documentary on heroin addiction that was part of a public broadcast.

So let me ask you again, "I stated mine. What is yours? Seldom I get this annoyed but you're seriously out of your depth on this topic unless you could explain why you think this way, from your own experience?".

Can you?

Do you think living unprotected from the elements outdoors on the street will improve their mental health? What about when they get robbed? I met a homeless guy a few years back who was having trouble getting access to social services because he had been woken up at knifepoint and was robbed of his ID and other belongings while sleeping on the street.


If you don't think living indoors is important, what is?
 
Last edited:

Ionian

Member
Do you think living unprotected from the elements outdoors on the street will improve their mental health? What about when they get robbed? I met a homeless guy a few years back who was having trouble getting access to social services because he had been woken up at knifepoint and was robbed of his ID and other belongings while sleeping on the street.


If you don't think living indoors is important, what is?

I give up,

Your post - "I met a homeless guy a few years back who was having trouble getting access to social services because he had been woken up at knifepoint and was robbed of his ID and other belongings while sleeping on the street."

If you don't think living indoors is important, what is?
I called you out for experience. Asked yours, well you met a homeless guy a few years ago.

OK, I understand. your experience is that. Fair play to you for meeting a homeless guy. What did you do for him?

I need to head out but will reply in kindness to whatever you post as that is kinda the point. Will be later though.
 
I give up,

Your post - "I met a homeless guy a few years back who was having trouble getting access to social services because he had been woken up at knifepoint and was robbed of his ID and other belongings while sleeping on the street."


I called you out for experience. Asked yours, well you met a homeless guy a few years ago.

OK, I understand. your experience is that. Fair play to you for meeting a homeless guy. What did you do for him?

I need to head out but will reply in kindness to whatever you post as that is kinda the point. Will be later though.


In the particular case of that homeless guy I talked to him for a few hours, suggested resources that might help, gave him directions to a place he was trying to find, and gave him money. I brought that up to illustrate that sleeping outside is a safety issue.

I could try to one up you on the experience thing and say "I have family members who were homeless." I didn't respond because I think that is the least valid form of argument, partially because anyone can say whatever they want on the internet, and because it is anecdotal.

You are vulnerable when you sleep outside. That is obvious, we shouldn't let people do that as an ordinary thing even if that is what they want.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom