PetriP-TNT
Member
https://www.reddit.com/r/DotA2/comments/2wapvb/is_valves_dota_team_ever_gonna_do_an_ama/
lol
the top reply put it well though, and the same would happen if John Walker/Angry Joe or whoever is the current popular "pulls no punches journo" would sit down with any of them.
They'd probably just end up giving people more material to complain about.
Imagine you ask them about why the "other players can stand-in for abandoned team mates" feature was cut and they explain how the feature was internally tossed back and forth and never quite worked out and finally got scrapped since it didn't seem worth the complications. I bet a good chunk of the community replies to that answer would be something along the lines of "Oh, but when it's about hats it's no problem to keep working on scrapped features for years because you it makes you money, right?", while to the silent majority the dev's answer is probably just an easily forgettable piece of trivia.
Communicating stuff to the community pays off when it can prevent a shitstorm - like Diretide or when color-sorted MMR rumors started brewing - but otherwise the risk of generating angry misunderstandings and having to clear them up even if not everyone's gonna read up on the follow-up and facts, just doesn't seem worth the hassle. That's especially true for discussing their products' future, nobody wants to make false promises or hype up people only to disappoint and devalue communications in the future.
Plus, for most people, what matters most is Valve's actions, not talk, since they're a content provider. Asking for why Visage's auto-summon select has been bugged for ages while someone's had time for trivial tasks like Phase Boots for example usually isn't really about getting an answer, it's indirectly demanding to fix Visage. Asking about the company's internal structure and how lose teams can get shit done on time at all is usually indirectly asking for more consistent or more frequent updates. Asking about why the hell they'd think experimenting 3 months of item trade restrictions was a good idea is usually indirectly asking for the change to be reverted because of personal discomfort.
Answers to that stuff usually won't satisfy people or will be forgotten fairly quickly (Gabe forging a crowbar and saying "these things, they take time" certainly doesn't seem to have impacted Ep3/HL3 discussions, including clamoring for just a small life sign) and I doubt the potential for misinterpretations will make them a worthwhile investment. Seems like a way better move to lurk and deliver instead.
I... i... is that a... re...reasonable post in a vidya game forum.