• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Tabula Rogeriana, an amazing medieval map of the world

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
In the 12th century the Normans ruled Southern Italy and Sicily. King Roger II famously permitted broad religious tolerance, welcoming Muslim intellectuals from the Islamic Golden Age as well as Byzantine Christian intellectuals to court. Trade and access to knowledge flourished relative to most of Europe.

One of the more interesting results of this scenario is the Tabula Rogeriana, an atlas of the world commissioned by King Roger II and made by Arab geographer al-Idrisi:

Wikipedia:
----------
The Nuzhat al-mushtāq fī ikhtirāq al-āfāq (Arabic: نزهة المشتاق في اختراق الآفاق, lit. "The Excursion of One Eager to Penetrate the Distant Horizons"), commonly known in the West as the Tabula Rogeriana (lit. "The Book of Roger" in Latin), is an atlas commissioned by the Norman King Roger II in 1138 and completed by the Arab geographer Muhammad al-Idrisi in 1154. The atlas compiles 70 maps of the known world with associated descriptions and commentary of each specific location by Al-Idrisi.[1][2][3][4]
----------

I will note that calling your atlas and life's work "The Excursion of One Eager to Penetrate the Distant Horizons" is beyond cool.

In it, we have quite the detailed and accurate map of the known world. I will present it upside down for congruence with modern maps:

gW6Gd7o.jpeg



Other maps from the Islamic Golden Age often centered around the Islamic territory or were not nearly as detailed. For example, al-Biruni's map of the world in 1029:

aFHpRdv.png


Meanwhile, the work for Tabula Rogeriana by al-Idrisi took 15 years of research and utilized high levels of scientific rigor.

Additional background:

Wikipedia
----------
The book, written in Arabic, is divided into seven "climatic zones" each of which is subdivided into ten sections. Each section is given its two-page spread map, for a total of 70 maps. The maps are oriented with North at the bottom, South at the top, with Mecca in the middle.[9] Each map was organized according to a coordinate system that, while inaccurate by modern standards, nonetheless ensured a level of rigor and consistency in scale from map to map.[10] Al-Idrisi added pages of commentary following each map he produced. The text incorporates descriptions of the physical, cultural, political, and socioeconomic conditions of each region.[2][11] This information was largely accurate, with inconsistencies being attributable to flawed accounts from the travelers interviewed.[10] The map and its details also convey the original intention of the map's patron. Areas in North Africa and Europe that were closer to Roger II's kingdom had more accurate information, while further areas such as Southeast Asia were less detailed. This reflects Roger II's desire to learn more about his domain and its surrounding areas, as well as Al-Idrisi's greater personal experience with these lands. The work showed, in al-Idrisi's words, "the seven climatic regions, with their respective countries and districts, coasts and lands, gulfs and seas, watercourses and river mouths".

It calculated the circumference to be 37,000 kilometres (23,000 mi) – an error of less than 10 percent – and it hinted at the concept of gravity. The different maps, when compiled together, made a rectangular map of the known world. In later editions, a smaller circular world map in which the south was drawn at the top and Mecca, at the center was added to the manuscript. Al-Idrisi's book came to be known as Kitab Rujar (Roger's Book). The original atlas and silver disc was destroyed in a rebellion headed by Matthew Bonnellus in 1160. The manuscript enjoyed wide popularity and use throughout the world. The medieval scholar Gabriel Sionita translated the book into Latin and printed it in Paris in 1619. The book was also translated into Spanish, German, Russian, Finnish, French, Italian, Austrian, and Swedish.[12] A total of 10 copies remain in various conditions, 5 of which are complete manuscripts.[2] Two of these are currently stored at the Bibliothèque Nationale de France including the oldest, which dates to about 1325, (MS Arabe 2221).[clarification needed] The discrepancies found between manuscripts from different locations are owed to the fact that al-Idrisi left multiple different drafts for the original work.[12] Another copy, made in Cairo in 1553, is in the Bodleian Library in Oxford (Mss. Pococke 375). It was acquired in 1692.[13] The most complete manuscript, which includes the world map and all seventy sectional maps, is kept in Istanbul.[11]
----------


Another comparison is the Hereford Mappa Mundi from circa 1300 AD England. Quite the difference, since it is a religiously sourced map. You can see Jerusalem at its center. Very interesting as an artistic work and historic artifact even if you might have trouble getting where you're going.

lYJpkvZ.jpeg




In a museum in the UAE they've reproduced the Tabula Rogeriana map as a globe:


0rHKW62.jpeg
 

NeoIkaruGAF

Gold Member
It’s a fascinating subject. I recommend reading A history of the world in 12 maps. It’s a ridiculously dense book, and I still have to finish it. But it covers the above maps and many more. I’m always interested in how our modern-day standards developed through history, and how people solved problems we now don’t even have to stop and consider.

One thing that I find amazing is how the ancients apparently already put North up and South down in several representations of the world - yet, in later eras, you may have maps that are oriented upside-down compared to this common notion. Also interesting is to find out that there were maps of the Muslim world with Mecca at their center. Or that even in modern times Japanese world maps put Japan at the center, which is quite a shift in perspective compared to the usual Britain-centered atlas of the world.
 

winjer

Gold Member
Most people don't realize how lucky we are to have such detailed maps of the World.
For most of human history, we did not know the real size of countries, and much less of continents.

One famous mistake, that is quite recent is the description of a vast range of mountains across Africa.
Up until the XIX century, Europeans believed that these mountains existed, because of a description in ancient Greek texts, from Ptolemy about the Kilimanjaro.
But Africa was very inhospitable for outsiders. For a long time, it was called the White Man's grave. Mostly because of malaria.
It took until the 1820s, when 2 French chemists managed to find a way to extract Quinine from the Chinchona Calisaya tree. This was the first real treatment for malaria, and it opened the door for the exploration of Africa.
Unfortunately, it also started the age of exploitation of Africa by European powers, that lasted over a century.

This map is from 1805, and despite the coastline being well known and mapped by Europeans, the interior was a complete mystery.
Notice how in the middle of Africa, there is a representation of a vast range of mountains, that spans from the east to the west coast.
But in reality, it never existed. It was just a misinterpretation of a 2500 old Greek text.

Edit: I had some dates wrong.
ziGx7Sn.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Dacvak

No one shall be brought before our LORD David Bowie without the true and secret knowledge of the Photoshop. For in that time, so shall He appear.
That globe version of the Tabula Rogeriana is so insanely cool. I’d love to see that in person.

It blows my mind how accurate some cartographers were even just a few hundred years ago.
 

NeoIkaruGAF

Gold Member
Most people don't realize how lucky we are to have such detailed maps of the World.
For most of human history, we did not know the real size of countries, and much less of continents.

One famous mistake, that is quite recent is the description of a vast range of mountains across Africa.
Up until the XIX century, Europeans believed that these mountains existed, because of a description in ancient Greek texts, from Ptolemy about the Kilimanjaro.
But Africa was very inhospitable for outsiders. For a long time, it was called the White Man's grave. Mostly because malaria.
It took until the 1920s, when 2 French chemists managed to find a way to extract Quinine from the Chinchona Calisaya tree. This was the first real treatment for malaria, and it opened the door for the exploration of Africa.
Unfortunately, it also started the age of exploitation of Africa by European powers, that lasted over a century.

This map is from 1905, and despite the coastline being well known and mapped by Europeans, the interior was a complete mystery.
Notice how in the middle of Africa, there is a representation of a vast range of mountains, that spans from the east to the west coast.
But in reality, it never existed. It was just a misinterpretation of a 2500 old Greek text.
ziGx7Sn.jpeg
This is from 1805, not 1905. The great modern explorations of Africa started around halfway through the 19th century. At the start of World War I, pretty much the entirety of Africa had been colonized by European countries - tension between empires about the African colonies was, in fact, among the reasons for the war.

Cartography in the age of sea exploration reached impossible precision when you consider how little they had to work with. I remember seeing a map of the coastline of Australia made by a guy who had navigated around the island and apparently only sat down to draw the full map when he was in prison. The degree of accuracy is something my mind cannot grasp. I could barely get the overall shape of Australia with a map open on front of me.
 
Last edited:

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
It’s a fascinating subject. I recommend reading A history of the world in 12 maps. It’s a ridiculously dense book, and I still have to finish it. But it covers the above maps and many more. I’m always interested in how our modern-day standards developed through history, and how people solved problems we now don’t even have to stop and consider.

One thing that I find amazing is how the ancients apparently already put North up and South down in several representations of the world - yet, in later eras, you may have maps that are oriented upside-down compared to this common notion. Also interesting is to find out that there were maps of the Muslim world with Mecca at their center. Or that even in modern times Japanese world maps put Japan at the center, which is quite a shift in perspective compared to the usual Britain-centered atlas of the world.
Looks like a good book, will give it a read!
Most people don't realize how lucky we are to have such detailed maps of the World.
For most of human history, we did not know the real size of countries, and much less of continents.

One famous mistake, that is quite recent is the description of a vast range of mountains across Africa.
Up until the XIX century, Europeans believed that these mountains existed, because of a description in ancient Greek texts, from Ptolemy about the Kilimanjaro.
But Africa was very inhospitable for outsiders. For a long time, it was called the White Man's grave. Mostly because malaria.
It took until the 1920s, when 2 French chemists managed to find a way to extract Quinine from the Chinchona Calisaya tree. This was the first real treatment for malaria, and it opened the door for the exploration of Africa.
Unfortunately, it also started the age of exploitation of Africa by European powers, that lasted over a century.

This map is from 1905, and despite the coastline being well known and mapped by Europeans, the interior was a complete mystery.
Notice how in the middle of Africa, there is a representation of a vast range of mountains, that spans from the east to the west coast.
But in reality, it never existed. It was just a misinterpretation of a 2500 old Greek text.
ziGx7Sn.jpeg
Fascinating. And yes, we can see how the sickle cell gene was able to propagate through sub-Saharan Africa by granting resistance to malaria despite its drawbacks. Malaria is serious business.

I read the book by Ibn Battuta on his travels in the 14th century. As I recall he did cross quite a ways south into Africa, but he may not have described the geography in detail as he was more concerned with culture and cities.
 

winjer

Gold Member
This is from 1805, not 1905. The great modern explorations of Africa started around halfway through the 10th century. At the start of World War I, pretty much the entirety of Africa had been colonized by European countries - tension between empires about the African colonies was, in fact, among the reasons for the war.

Cartography in the age of sea exploration reached impossible precision when you consider how little they had to work with. I remember seeing a map of the coastline of Australia made by a guy who had navigated around the island and apparently only sat down to draw the full map when he was in prison. The degree of accuracy is something my mind cannot grasp. I could barely get the overall shape of Australia with a map open on front of me.

I had already fixed the dates. A stupid mistake with numbers, despite stating it was the XIX century. Sorry about that.

Here is a map from 1856, when Europeans had a better grasp of the continent.
Still some things missing, but compared to maps from the start of the XIX century, it is miles better.
UFUv8nS.jpeg
 

NeoIkaruGAF

Gold Member
I had already fixed the dates. A stupid mistake with numbers, despite stating it was the XIX century. Sorry about that.

Here is a map from 1856, when Europeans had a better grasp of the continent.
Still some things missing, but compared to maps from the start of the XIX century, it is miles better.
UFUv8nS.jpeg
Yep, things got better fast once the great colonial race got into motion.

I’ve only just noticed that the first map you posted reads “great desert of Zaara”, I’d never seen that spelling before.
Also, it erroneously tags the Northern Atlantic Ocean as the Northern Pacific!
 

winjer

Gold Member
Looks like a good book, will give it a read!

Fascinating. And yes, we can see how the sickle cell gene was able to propagate through sub-Saharan Africa by granting resistance to malaria despite its drawbacks. Malaria is serious business.

I read the book by Ibn Battuta on his travels in the 14th century. As I recall he did cross quite a ways south into Africa, but he may not have described the geography in detail as he was more concerned with culture and cities.

That is what happens when a population is exposed to a disease for centuries, or millennia.
Malaria, in a way, served to protect Africa for millennia.
The opposite happened with America. Where the isolation from the Euro-Asian continent, meant they would not have the immunity to many diseases.
Because of that, around 90% of the American indigenous population died.
Or when 1/3 of Europe died, because of the Black Death, that came from China or the Middle East.
 
Last edited:

jason10mm

Gold Member
I like the ancient maps that speculate on Antarctica, like the Buache map (1739, just a few years after Antarctica was 'discovered') saying it has a central lake

SsFDYT8.jpeg


or the Piri Reis map from the 1500s just after Colombus that seem to suggest a southern landmass well before there was any definitive proof if it (in European sources at least)
MwMhUbI.jpeg


I also really dig the Polynesian stick charts that track ocean currents between islands and don't really show the islands in terms of "as the crow flies" distance and relationship to each other

blS0xdZ.jpeg
 

Aesius

Member
That’s some serious pattern recognition! Very cool, it does look like it could’ve been an inspiration especially with how the Mediterranean is represented in the Rogeriana.
Benefit of coincidence, mostly. My 4-year-old son and I have been playing TLOZ for the past few weeks, and I've consulted that map for the second quest quite a few times (never actually played the second quest as a kid, so it was all new to me).

I do love ancient maps, though. It's cool to think of what they represented to the people who created and viewed them. Back when the world was full of mystery and legends. Honestly, not unlike seeing the map of a large RPG/open-world game now and wondering what there is to discover.

Newly researched maps were likely the peak of "technology" for hundreds of years of human civilization. Back when other forms of innovation and progress were extremely slow and almost unnoticeable in a given lifespan. It would have seemed almost magical to look at parchment or another medium showing the entire WORLD, the size and scope of which would have been impossible to understand for the average person in those days.
 

nkarafo

Member
Looks like they completely gave up on Greece. It's the most complex shaped country, there is no way they mistaken it like that even if they tried, also, look how the country's Aegean islands are represented almost like a pattern... They didn't even try to randomize the sizes and placement a bit to at least make it look believable.
 

NeoIkaruGAF

Gold Member
Another good example of a step forward for map making was the Cassini map of France, made for Louis XIV. 300 years ago.
This was essentially, the first map made using triangulation. And it was so accurate, that it made France 20% smaller. Of course, when compared to previous maps.

I0zuFzQ.jpeg
The book I mentioned earlier has an entire chapter about this, too.
The sad thing is, some of the people sent to measure some country areas of France were injured or killed by locals who didn't understand what they were doing.
 

winjer

Gold Member
The book I mentioned earlier has an entire chapter about this, too.
The sad thing is, some of the people sent to measure some country areas of France were injured or killed by locals who didn't understand what they were doing.

In the Village of Les Estables, in 1740, the villagers even killed one of Cassini's assistants. Just because they thought their tools and science were the cause of a bad harvest.
Today, we think some people are stupid because of social media. But people were already stupid way back then.
 

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
Benefit of coincidence, mostly. My 4-year-old son and I have been playing TLOZ for the past few weeks, and I've consulted that map for the second quest quite a few times (never actually played the second quest as a kid, so it was all new to me).

I do love ancient maps, though. It's cool to think of what they represented to the people who created and viewed them. Back when the world was full of mystery and legends. Honestly, not unlike seeing the map of a large RPG/open-world game now and wondering what there is to discover.

Newly researched maps were likely the peak of "technology" for hundreds of years of human civilization. Back when other forms of innovation and progress were extremely slow and almost unnoticeable in a given lifespan. It would have seemed almost magical to look at parchment or another medium showing the entire WORLD, the size and scope of which would have been impossible to understand for the average person in those days.
Very true. And it’s a shame that GPS and streamlining have deliberately stripped most games of any of that genuine sense of exploration which recalls that medieval wonder. I loved learning the alien, forbidding world in Morrowind through exploration and talking to NPCs. Elden Ring did a good job recently at least of withholding the full scope of the game world early on.
 

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
Man... that complete disregard for the Nordics... Is Norway and Sweden split apart or am I seeing things wrong?

ovOUVON.jpeg


giphy.webp
King Roger II was Norman, so part Norwegian or Danish ancestry. But it appears there was a lot working against charting Scandinavia properly at this time. Not much trade going on yet, no major hubs, relatively inhospitable to foreigners, not unified countries (mostly). So there would be a lack of accurate information on it for someone doing research in the Mediterranean. My inferences at least.
 

Hookshot

Member
Given the choice of mapping soggy Britain and freezing Scandinavia properly or the Mediterranean and near east I'd choose the sunny ones as well.
 
Last edited:

DKehoe

Member
I love old maps like these. They're a convergence of science and art and the way they evolve over time reflects how we see the world. Producing a map like that, which covers such a wide area in a relatively accurate way, was an incredible achievement. Calling it The Excursion of One Eager to Penetrate the Distant Horizons makes it that bit more badass.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom