PanopticBlue said:
For stuff like this, I find that's always as good a place to start as any.
Conservatives have their own (multifarious) issues, but for stuff like this, it was definitely the "liberal" mindset that started the ball rolling. Obviously, nobody's advocating a kid getting caned or beaten-- but to not be able to discipline a kid by having them stand outside in the hall if they curse you out or spit at you, for instance? Tragically, in an attempt to foster tolerance and nurture our children's sensitivities, we've slid all the way to the other extreme. Who the hell knows what the solution is at this point...
Like so many other things in this country, the big problem is that the pendulum always seems to swing between the two extremes, never coming to rest at a sensible middle ground that would promote the best interests of all parties. All these educrats and lawyers mucking up the system...you have no idea. Like when they supplanted phonics instruction with that purportedly vaunted "whole word" reading, despite the fact that there was absolutely
zero empirical evidence that it would work. Apparently, having realized that a lot of kids couldn't read anymore, these braintrusts decided not to address the root causes-- oh no, that would step on people's toes-- but rather implement sweeping systemic reform based on spurious principles. Phonics has worked since the dawn of time, and all of a sudden, because kids can't read, it means that it's the
phonetic instructional method that's broken? :lol
Sure. That's the level of critical thinking going on in your typical educrat's mind, sadly. Thankfully, someone grabbed these nimrods by the shoulders one day and vigorously shook them so that what little gray matter they had would wrest itself from the walls of their skull, where it was sitting inert, plugging the (numerous) holes in their head. The "whole word reading" method was thus abolished a few years ago.
Sorry for the tangent, but the disservice that's being done to our kids sometimes is just incredible. In case you don't know what "whole word reading" entails, well, it's precisely what it sounds like: reading and recognizing whole words
as wholes, as opposed to building upwards from phonetic units to produce known sounds and then stringing them together to sound out words. Guess what happened more often than not when a "whole word reader" encountered a word he or she wasn't familiar with? Exactly: nothing. They were ill-equipped to deal with new words, having never learned the
tools of proper language pronunciation; they couldn't verbally construct words from their component sounds. In short, they were functionally illiterate unless they memorized scads of words and could recognize them (and recall their pronunciation) by sight. Very tedious and counterintuitive, to say the least. But one of the reasons it caught on with educrats was because it allowed children who wouldn't be able to read any other way to be able to "keep up", somewhat, with those who could easily master phonics and move on to more advanced material if given the chance. Wouldn't want to offend anyone's sensibilities, you know; we mustn't let any child stand too far above their peers, now. It's not PC.
Everybody has an agenda, and that agenda seldom is "the children".
But anyway, sorry for the rant-- my mind just went on a tangent and I felt like finishing it. I'm avoiding studying physics, so that's understandable.