Testing out my new capture card, weeee (T5)

Ferrio

Banned
newcard.jpg

newcard2.jpg

newcard3.jpg

newcard4.jpg

newcard5.jpg

newcard6.jpg

newcard7.jpg

newcard8.jpg

newcard9.jpg

newcard10.jpg


Better than my old one, but stupid software that came with it won't install (think it's my fault...) so using Dscaler, which is great....... but can't quite make videos.
 
Ferrio said:
Still messing with options, and not sure how well Dscaler works with my card.
Try the tomsmocomp deinterlacing filter. If dscaler displays anything at all then it should work 100% with your card.
 
Ya, I just tried that one just now (some reason dscaler detected my machine was a lot slower than it actually is, therefor not letting me use that filter).

The results

newcard11.jpg

newcard12.jpg
 
Ferrio said:
Better than my old one, but stupid software that came with it won't install (think it's my fault...) so using Dscaler, which is great....... but can't quite make videos.

Try using the experimental TimeShift function. I use that to capture TV & Video.
 
8bit said:
Try using the experimental TimeShift function. I use that to capture TV & Video.
Virtual VCR is a much safer way to make videos. I've tried about anything possible to capture videos, and I always come back to Virtual VCR with a lossless codec (VBLE usually) in the end.
 
Ferrio said:
Ya, I just tried that one just now (some reason dscaler detected my machine was a lot slower than it actually is, therefor not letting me use that filter).

The results

newcard11.jpg

newcard12.jpg
Is that with tomsmocomp ? You should not get that much interlacing artifacts with this one.
 
Funky Papa said:
Who knows something about this one?

http://www.turtlebeach.com/site/products/videocapture/vidusb/

vausb3dbx_190w.gif

$129.95 for an USB powered DV capturing device doesn't look that bad.
It usually works nicely, except there is a big delay (a few seconds) between what the source sends and what is displayed on the PC. So it's impossible to use it for capturing games, unless you have a dual svideo/composite cable (svideo goes to the capture device, composite to tv). I myself use my audio receiver to send the video signal to both my TV and PC, it's much more convenient.
 
Ferrio said:
Well any idea how to make my picture better in Dscaler? Any tweaks or anything?
Try some other deinterlacing filters, like temporal comb maybe. Make sure you have a 720 pixel width and mess with the noise filter too.
 
Blimblim said:
Try some other deinterlacing filters, like temporal comb maybe. Make sure you have a 720 pixel width and mess with the noise filter too.

For high motion captures, the artifacts just will not go away even with Toms. A little sharpness filter will help, and better calibrate the brightness/contrast with a DVD (Avia, Video Essential).

BTW, I use the max 768 pixels width on my SAA7130.
 
I hate some of the artifacts I get when I take a screen when there is a lot of motion in the picture.

Look here.
tek5.jpg

Look how "pixly" Kazyua is.

tek9.jpg

Or look at Raven and compare him to Bryan.

Or maybe Im just seeing things? Im used to grabbing High-Res PAL screens. ;)
 
Blimblim said:
Try the tomsmocomp deinterlacing filter. If dscaler displays anything at all then it should work 100% with your card.

Speaking of that...

I was messing with dscaler yesterday and I noticed that, on certain filters, I see tear lines appear every so often. The games display the full 60 fps and look very good, but the image tears. Any ideas?
 
megateto said:
Is there any capture card with SCART input?
Nope, RGB or YUV capture is something much more costly than simple composite or S-Video. I'm looking to buy a progressive capture card for the next generation, and it's simply scary how much this costs (count about $2500 for the Xena card from AJA, plus the price of the component -> HD-SDI: $1500).
One day maybe...
 
Some of these screen captures look like you guys are applying for screen capture jobs at gamespot. ;)
 
Blimblim said:
Simple. Get the cheapest PCI card you can find. Cheap = conexant = support for dscaler and good capture from virtualvcr.

I take it you're not a Hauppauge fan? I have a PVR-250 and have been trying, on and off, to get good game videos and screenshots out of it for some time now, with limited success. It unfortunately doesn't work in dscaler or quite a few other widely respected programs.

The weird thing is that the raw Mpeg2 captures from this thing look really nice and smooth, but when I encode them (with divx, xvid or whatever) they get this really awful interlaced look to them. I've never been able to figure out how to fix it or filter it out, and it drives me insane. Check this out to see what I'm talking about, particularly on the moving notes : http://www.libblerabble.com/videos/Taiko - CURL.avi - any ideas?

I'm thinking about just taking your cheapest-card-possible advice, and seeing how it goes. I've already found one of the models you mentioned for around $20, so I figure it's worth a shot?
 
bobbyconover said:
I take it you're not a Hauppauge fan? I have a PVR-250 and have been trying, on and off, to get good game videos and screenshots out of it for some time now, with limited success. It unfortunately doesn't work in dscaler or quite a few other widely respected programs.

The weird thing is that the raw Mpeg2 captures from this thing look really nice and smooth, but when I encode them (with divx, xvid or whatever) they get this really awful interlaced look to them. I've never been able to figure out how to fix it or filter it out, and it drives me insane. Check this out to see what I'm talking about, particularly on the moving notes : http://www.libblerabble.com/videos/Taiko - CURL.avi - any ideas?

I'm thinking about just taking your cheapest-card-possible advice, and seeing how it goes. I've already found one of the models you mentioned for around $20, so I figure it's worth a shot?
Hauppauge uses connexant chips for the cheapest cards too. No idea what's in these PVR card. Your video looks very nice except for the interlacing.
You should really take a look at avisynth for deinterlacing with the tomsmocomp plugin. That's what I use for my videos and it's excellent. Just create the avs file, and open it with virtualdub as you would a standard video
Code:
LoadPlugin("c:\program files\AVISynth 2.5\plugins\TomsMoComp.dll")
AviSource("source.avi")
ConvertToYUY2()
TomsMoComp(1,15,1)
Done.
 
Are there even any other programs besides dscaler that are capable of displaying 60 fps? All of the others I've tried absolutely refuse to display anything higher than 30 fps.
 
dark10x said:
Are there even any other programs besides dscaler that are capable of displaying 60 fps? All of the others I've tried absolutely refuse to display anything higher than 30 fps.

If you want to shell out the $1000, Pinnacle has a true USB 2.0 component input device. With the software, it captures up to 60fps, too. Of course, component-in is hard to come by, so that's a steal.

breakup_box_large.jpg
 
Culex said:
If you want to shell out the $1000, Pinnacle has a true USB 2.0 component input device. With the software, it captures up to 60fps, too. Of course, component-in is hard to come by, so that's a steal.

breakup_box_large.jpg

Heh, the video guy downstairs here at work actually has that exact setup. No way I'd have access to it, though. :P
 
Culex said:
If you want to shell out the $1000, Pinnacle has a true USB 2.0 component input device. With the software, it captures up to 60fps, too. Of course, component-in is hard to come by, so that's a steal.

breakup_box_large.jpg

It will not be real-time from analog sources as it encodes them to MPEG before transferring to PC.
 
maskrider said:
It will not be real-time from analog sources as it encodes them to MPEG before transferring to PC.

Are you sure about that? It does do real-time authoring, including screen capturing.
 
Culex said:
If you want to shell out the $1000, Pinnacle has a true USB 2.0 component input device. With the software, it captures up to 60fps, too. Of course, component-in is hard to come by, so that's a steal.

breakup_box_large.jpg
Interesting. The problem is that this does not support progressive so you will still get an interlaced image that wil be processed by some software. Also USB capture devices create a delay so you may not be able to use it to make gaming videos.
 
maskrider said:
It will not be real-time from analog sources as it encodes them to MPEG before transferring to PC.

Maskrider, while you're here, I have a question...

What is the best way to capture video from a PC game? I've tried FRAPs, but was not entirely pleased with the results. It recorded mostly fine on my 3.6 GHz (30 fps videos were perfect and 60 fps videos were only good on lower end games), but it killed my 3.0 GHz. Is there a more efficient, higher quality method for capturing or do you also use FRAPs?
 
dark10x said:
Maskrider, while you're here, I have a question...

What is the best way to capture video from a PC game? I've tried FRAPs, but was not entirely pleased with the results. It recorded mostly fine on my 3.6 GHz (30 fps videos were perfect and 60 fps videos were only good on lower end games), but it killed my 3.0 GHz. Is there a more efficient, higher quality method for capturing or do you also use FRAPs?

I also have a 3.0G and used FRAPs on the last Silent Hill 2 fog comparison videos and I think it is not very stable and reliable, let alone efficient.

But I don't know of (didn't checked in fact) any other way for capturing videos on PC games.
 
bobbyconover said:
I take it you're not a Hauppauge fan? I have a PVR-250 and have been trying, on and off, to get good game videos and screenshots out of it for some time now, with limited success. It unfortunately doesn't work in dscaler or quite a few other widely respected programs.

The weird thing is that the raw Mpeg2 captures from this thing look really nice and smooth, but when I encode them (with divx, xvid or whatever) they get this really awful interlaced look to them. I've never been able to figure out how to fix it or filter it out, and it drives me insane. Check this out to see what I'm talking about, particularly on the moving notes : http://www.libblerabble.com/videos/Taiko - CURL.avi - any ideas?

I'm thinking about just taking your cheapest-card-possible advice, and seeing how it goes. I've already found one of the models you mentioned for around $20, so I figure it's worth a shot?
I've got the PVR-250 too. I've managed to tackle the interlacing issue. The PVR-250 got a hardware mpeg2 encoder chip and it dumps it's recording as interlaced mpeg2 onto your HD.

Possible options are AVISynth (with mpeg2 plugin and TomsMoComp.dll) or VirtualDub-Mpeg2Mod (deinterlacing with it's own deinterlacing filter or smart deinterlacer).
 
ChryZ said:
Possible options are AVISynth (with mpeg2 plugin and TomsMoComp.dll) or VirtualDub-Mpeg2Mod (deinterlacing with it's own deinterlacing filter or smart deinterlacer).
Deinterlacing with Virtualdub is a bad idea. The plugin API was not designed for stuff like that so it makes complex deinterlacing with motion compensation totally impossible to do.
I've tested many ways to deinterlace videos, and nothing ever beat tomsmocomp or sangnom with avisynth.
 
So, barring spending $3,000 on a capture card with component in, is there any other way to capture a progressive signal?
 
Blimblim said:
Deinterlacing with Virtualdub is a bad idea. The plugin API was not designed for stuff like that so it makes complex deinterlacing with motion compensation totally impossible to do.
I've tested many ways to deinterlace videos, and nothing ever beat tomsmocomp or sangnom with avisynth.

I use Pegasys's TMPGEnc XPress 3.0 (to deinterlace and encode) and Premiere (to cut and process).

The Rage Theatre 200 on AIW 9800 Pro can indeed take analog HD component input from what I know (I tested it on a evaluation board - not on video cards - before, full of problems for sure, mostly immature software), but I was surprised that there was no further development on that in consumer 3D video cards.
 
maskrider said:
I use Pegasys's TMPGEnc XPress 3.0 (to deinterlace and encode) and Premiere (to cut and process).

The Rage Theatre 200 on AIW 9800 Pro can indeed take analog HD component input from what I know (I tested it on a evaluation board - not on video cards - before, full of problems for sure, mostly immature software), but I was surprised that there was no further development on that in consumer 3D video cards.

Any way for me to like...I dunno, "hotwire" a way to give myself analog component input on my card then?
:D
 
Culex said:
Any way for me to like...I dunno, "hotwire" a way to give myself analog component input on my card then?
:D

But the software was not ready I suppose, the software with the eval board had problem syncing to the HD modes, but that was already more than 2 years ago.
 
maskrider said:
I use Pegasys's TMPGEnc XPress 3.0 (to deinterlace and encode) and Premiere (to cut and process).
Ha yes, I only use free software though ;)

The Rage Theatre 200 on AIW 9800 Pro can indeed take analog HD component input from what I know (I tested it on a evaluation board - not on video cards - before, full of problems for sure, mostly immature software), but I was surprised that there was no further development on that in consumer 3D video cards.
Isn't the ATI HDTV support only for the tuner part though ?
 
Top Bottom