unpopularblargh
Member
Jeffrey Gooldberg basically wrote a side-piece to The Obama Doctrine about what Obama feels the Republicans get wrong about ISIS and Islam and why you shouldn't look at it like communism during the Cold War.
Link: http://www.theatlantic.com/internat...mmunism-islamism-isis/475833/?utm_source=SFFB
More at the link above.
P.S. You will be missed Obama.
Link: http://www.theatlantic.com/internat...mmunism-islamism-isis/475833/?utm_source=SFFB
The great mass of the worlds billion-and-a-half Muslims are not ISIS supporters, nor sympathizers, and it is also true, of course, that most of ISISs victims are Muslim. Only Islam can truly defeat this movement. One reason Obama is cautious in using heated, or overly generalized, rhetoric is that he would like to avoid a situation in which ordinary Muslims come to believe that the West despises their religion. It is a core interest of ISIS to convince non-radicalized Muslims that there is no space for them in the West. Trump and Cruz are helping ISIS make this case; Obama, and the national-security apparatus of the United States, are not interested in doing this.
The danger comes, Obama told me, when people apply lessons of the struggle against communism in the struggle against Islamist terrorism.
You have some on the Republican side who will insist that what we need is the same moral clarity with respect to radical Islam. Except, of course, communism was not embedded in a whole bunch of cultures, communism wasnt a millennium-old religion that was embraced by a whole host of good, decent, hard-working people who are our allies. Communism for the most part was a foreign, abstract ideology that had been adopted by some nationalist figures, or those who were concerned about poverty and inequality in their countries but wasnt organic to these cultures.
Obama said that the manner in which a president discusses Islam has direct bearing on the fight against Islams most extreme manifestations. I do believe that how the president of the United States talks about Islam and Muslims can strengthen or weaken the cause of those Muslims who we want to work with, and that when we use loose language that appears to pose a civilizational conflict between the West and Islam, or the modern world and Islam, then we make it harder, not easier, for our friends and allies and ordinary people to resist and push back against the worst impulses inside the Muslim world.
Obama added, This is not speculation on my part. Lets just track what has happened from the emergence of ISIS to the language that Donald Trump has used and his logical conclusion that we should ban Muslims from entering the country, including potentially Muslim citizens. That wasnt by accident. Im amused when I watch Republicans claim that Trumps language is unacceptable, and ask, How did we get here? We got here in part because the Republican base had been fed this notion that Islam is inherently violent, that this is who these folks are. And if youve been hearing that a lot, and then somebody shows up on the scene and says, well, the logical conclusion to civilizational conflict is we try to make sure that were not destroyed internally by this foreign civilization, thats what you get.
More at the link above.
P.S. You will be missed Obama.