• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

The Exorcism of Emily Rose thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Saw the trailer 2 weeks ago, and just came across this story which the movie is based on.

Emily Rose: The real Story of Anneliese Michel's Exorcism


It all began about 1968, when Anneliese (a very religious nurtured girl, who was born on the 21st of September 1952) has an insult. Paralysed and shaking she can’t call her 3 sisters, or her parents (Josef and Anna) for help. A Neurologist at the Psychiatric Clinic Würzburg diagnosed Epilepsy Type "Grand Mal". Depressions, often occurring after those Epilepsy Attacks, have not been recognized.

After a long stay at the Hospital, she begins to see devilish grimaces during her daily praying. In the fall of 1970 Anneliese returned to school, and while other girls live the freedom of the 70s, she starts believing to be possessed. She can’t find another reason for the grimaces. Now also voices are following her, saying that Anneliese will "stew in hell". The Depressions get stronger and stronger and Anneliese doesn’t see any reason for the meetings at the Doctors, because they don’t bring a relief. Just once, does she tell a Doctor about the "Demons", which even give orders to her now. But the gap between known Medicine and Catholic Ideology is too big, to get her problems considered.

In the summer of 1973 her parents ask different Pastors for an Exorcism. The Catholic Chaplains reject and recommend, to continue the medication on the now 20 year old Anneliese. The proof for a possession (Infestatio) is strictly structured, and before not all criterions are fulfilled, the Bishop can’t approve an Exorcism. Aversions against religious objects, speaking in languages the person never learned and supernatural powers, are just some of them.

Pastor Ernst Alt, supervising Anneliese at that time, asked the Bishop of Würzburg for the Permit to perform an Exorcism on Anneliese Michel in 1974. His request was also rejected, so he recommends Anneliese an even more religious Lifestyle. But the attacks don’t disappear. At her parents house in Klingenberg, she insults, beats, bites the family members. She doesn’t eat, because the demons don’t allow her to. Anneliese sleeps at the stone floor, eats Spiders, Flies and Coal. She even drinks her own Urine. For hours, she yells thru the house. Anneliese breaks Crucifixes, destroys paintings of Jesus and demolishes Rosaries. Running thru the house, tearing the clothes from her body and urinating on the floor is nothing unusual anymore. She even commits self-mutilation.

In September 1975, after an exact Verification, the Bishop of Würzburg, Josef Stangl, assigns Father Arnold Renz and Pastor Ernst Alt with the order, to perform "The Great Exorcism" on Anneliese Michel. The basis for this ritual is the "Rituale Romanum", a still valid Canon Law from the 17th century. Pastor Alt and Father Renz try to save Anneliese from, in the meantime over 6 individuals (Lucifer, Judas Iscariot, Nero, Cain, Hitler and Fleischmann, a disgraced Frankish Priest from the 16th century, and some other "Damned"), which manifested thru her. From September ’75 till July ’76, 1 to 2 sessions a week were held. Sometimes her attacks were so strong, that she had to be hold down by 3 men, or they had to chain her up. Between those sessions in her parent’s house, Anneliese has some time without any attacks, in which she goes to school, makes her final examinations at the Pedagogic Academy in Würzburg and goes to church. Just like she used to live before.

But the attacks didn’t stop. The young woman gets unconscious and paralyzed more often. The Exorcism continues over weeks and months. Always praying the same specified prayers and incantations, over and over again. Sometimes the parents are present, or her sisters. Even a married couple, that claims of having "discovered" Anneliese. Over several weeks, she denies every food. Her knees are burst, because of the 600 Genuflections she does obsessive during the Exorcisms. During the Exorcism there were over 40 audio tapes recorded, to log the possession.
The last day of the Exorcism Rite is the 30th of June 1976. Anneliese is now also suffering from a Pneumonia, totally emaciated and having high temperature. But she can’t waive doing the Genuflections. Her parents even help her doing them. "Beg for Absolution.", is the last sentence Anneliese says to the Exorcists. To her mother she says: "Mother, I’m afraid.". Anna Michel recorded the death of her daughter on the next day, the 1st of July 1976. At Noon, Pastor Ernst Alt informs the prosecuting authorities in Aschaffenburg. The Senior Prosecutor began investigating.

Short time before these events, William Friedkin’s "The Exorcist" came to the cinemas in Germany (1974), and started a paranormal Hysteria all over the land. Psychiatrist all over Europe, reported of an increase of obsessive ideas at their patients. For the Prosecutors, the factual situation is more than bizarre. And it took almost 2 years, until the "Klingenberg Case" was brought to court. Anneliese’s parents and the 2 Exorcists were accused of negligent homicide. There were only 2 questions to answer. What caused the death of Anneliese Michel, and who was responsible ?

The cause of death, as diagnosed by the Forensics: "Anneliese starved to death" ! If the Accused would have begun with forced feed, one week before her dead, Anneliese’s live could have been saved. Her sister told in front of the court, that Anneliese didn’t want to go to a Mental House, sedated and forced to eat. The Exorcists tried to prove the presence of the demons, by playing the tapes they recorded. There were such strange dialogues, like 2 of the demons arguing , who of them has to leave Anneliese’s body first. The demon, that called himself Hitler, talked with Frankish Accent (Hitler was born Austrian). None of those present during the Exorcisms, never had a doubt, that this weren’t demons.
The Psychiatrists, which have been ordered by the court, talked about "Doctrinaire Induction". Saying, that the Priests have offered Anneliese the contents of her psychotic behaviour. Consequentially she later accepted the behaviour of a, from a demon possessed person. Also an unsettled sexual development, along with the diagnosed Temporal Lobe Epilepsy influenced Anneliese’s Psychosis.

The judgement was, although the parents and the chaplains were adjudged guilty, not as hard as expected. All of the accused were sentenced to 6 months jail on probation, because of manslaughter resulting from negligence and omitted First Aid. The accused should have helped by taking care of the medical treatment the girl needed. But instead of doing so they aggravated the bad constitution, by using naïve Practices.

A Commission of the German Bishop-Conference later declared, that Anneliese Michel was not possessed. Anneliese’s body didn’t even find peace after the girl’s death. Because of some believe in miracles, it was said that her body doesn’t decay, her corpse gets exhumed 11/2 year after the burial. With the final result, that the body decays, as every other dead body. Till now her grave is a place of pilgrimage, for Rosary-praying pilgrims, who still think, that Anneliese Michel has defeated the Devil.

In 1999 Cardinal Medina Estévez presented Journalists, in Vatican-City, the new Version of the "Rituale Romanum" that was used by the Catholic Church since 1614. He presented them "De exorcismis et supplicationibus quibusdam" better know as "The Exorcism for the upcoming Millennium". After more then 10 years of editing, the Pope approbated the new Exorcism Rite, which is now allowed for worldwide usage. The change was initiated by the death of Anneliese Michel. The German Bishop-Conference demanded to ultimately abolish the "Rituale Romanum". The Vatican answered in his own way, with a new form of Exorcism. More then 20 years after Anneliese Michel died.

Official website and trailer: http://www.sonypictures.com/movies/theexorcismofemilyrose/

The movie synopsis:

Who's in it? Laura Linney

What's it about? In an extremely rare decision, the Catholic Church officially recognized the demonic possession of a 19 year-old college freshman. Told in terrifying flashbacks, "The Exorcism of Emily Rose" chronicles the haunting trial of the priest accused of negligence resulting in the death of the young girl believed to be possessed. Inspired by true events, the film stars Laura Linney as the lawyer who takes on the task of defending the priest (Tom Wilkinson) who performed the controversial exorcism.

emily1.jpg

002.jpg

exorcism.jpg
 
What's it about? In an extremely rare decision, the Catholic Church officially recognized the demonic possession of a 19 year-old college freshman.


"Okay guys, this is extremely rare behavior that cannot be treated by extremely rare drugs, so we must do our extremely rare exorcism."

And then they all do a dance and hold their crotch and scream, "RARE!".


...
 
Can you find a summary wrtten by an English speaker?
A Commission of the German Bishop-Conference later declared, that Anneliese Michel was not possessed. Anneliese’s body didn’t even find peace after the girl’s death. Because of some believe in miracles, it was said that her body doesn’t decay, her corpse gets exhumed 11/2 year after the burial. With the final result, that the body decays, as every other dead body. Till now her grave is a place of pilgrimage, for Rosary-praying pilgrims, who still think, that Anneliese Michel has defeated the Devil.
I don't have any idea what this is supposed to mean. If her body decays it means she's defeated the demons inside her? Or if it doesn't decay? And was her corpse found decayed or not or what?
 
border said:
Can you find a summary wrtten by an English speaker?I don't have any idea what this is supposed to mean. If her body decays it means she's defeated the demons inside her? Or if it doesn't decay? And was her corpse found decayed or not or what?

From another text:

A commission of the German Bishop-Conference later declared that Anneliese Michel was not possessed, however, this did not keep believers from supporting her struggles, and it was because so many believed in her that Anneliese's body did not find peace with death. Her corpse was exhumed eleven and a half years after her burial, only to confirm that it had decayed as would have been expected under normal circumstances. Today, her grave remains a place of pilgrimage for rosary-praying and for those who believe that Anneliese Michel bravely fought the devil.

So basically if she wouldn't have win against the devil while buried, her body wouldn't be found decayed after they exhumed her 11 years later.

The trailer doesn't seem to reflect the actual movie, I think it'll be more centered around the trial of the priests after her death, rather than her period where she gets possessed.
 
This movie could be the best thing since The Exorcist.

Anyways, the story is fascinating, and if the movie is done right, it could really be up there with the best horror movies.

Now, this movie brings up a lot of questions about possessions. The Church demands to have proof before going into "exorcism mode" and they really don't seem to take any case seriously if they don't have concrete proofs.

They say that proofs include : speaking in a language the person doesn't know (which, in my opinion, is more than enough proof), bad reactions to holy objects (which could be mental illness) and supernatural powers (could sometimes be adrenaline, if it's only about being strong, though levitation can't be caused by adrenaline).

This story doesn't seem to tell that the real girl from the story talked in another language, but they told about the girl speaking with different voices calling themselves demons. Now, even though another language was not present, the ability to change your voice and tone is not a talent that you can acquire through a mental illness.
 
Hellraizah said:
Now, even though another language was not present, the ability to change your voice and tone is not a talent that you can acquire through a mental illness.

There have been cases where MPD patients have exhibited different voices per alter.
 
A lot of people don't even believe Multiple Personality Disorder (MPD) exists. Though I guess you've gotta say the same for demonic possession :D
 
I'm gonna see it. Can't possibly be any worse than the Exorcist, which had severe difficulty living up to 25 years of hype and publicity, even with the super Scatalogical Snuff Film Edition.
 
The girl was schitzophrenic. Hearing voices, being ordered to do things, beliveing things that are happening that really are not, and rampant paranoia, are all key syntoms of the disease. You're more apt to believe in something that has been hammered into you than something that isn't and in this case the girl had the fear of god and satan scared into her from a young age and therefor took it on as her variation of schitzophrenic personality.

My GF works as a pysch nurse and she's seen 90 lb teenage girls require 3 cops and 3 orderlies to hold them down so an injections could be given. Demonic voices...well if I was so apt I could probably speak in some fucked up dialect that no one could understand if I wanted to. Levitation...never once have I seen it happen. It is always reported but never shown even where there are cameras about.
 
just came back from the movie and i didnt see any threads on it so i thought id bump this one up...but yeah awesome movie! i really liked it...it was creepy, smart (nothing brilliant), and somewhat thought provoking.

i just wish
they left the movie into the hands of the audience to decide if he she was or wasnt possessed.....seemed to me like we were led to chose the priest's side
 
acidviper said:
Yet another "Catholocism fucks up" movie
So true. On top of that, The Exorcist will never be topped as far as films of this genre go. And lastly, the bitch who plays Emily Rose was pretty hot in White Chicks, where she smacks a dildo across her nose. Welcome to Hollywood.
 
effzee said:
just came back from the movie and i didnt see any threads on it so i thought id bump this one up...but yeah awesome movie! i really liked it...it was creepy, smart (nothing brilliant), and somewhat thought provoking.

i just wish
they left the movie into the hands of the audience to decide if he she was or wasnt possessed.....seemed to me like we were led to chose the priest's side


yeah, they tried to be a bit impartial, but it was clear they were leaning towards the priests side


i liked the movie though. it was well done..
 
King Jippo said:
So true. On top of that, The Exorcist will never be topped as far as films of this genre go. And lastly, the bitch who plays Emily Rose was pretty hot in White Chicks, where she smacks a dildo across her nose. Welcome to Hollywood.


her performance was key....she really creeped me out at times.


tom was awesome as usual but that prosecutor...whoever played him was amazing as well.


scariest scene was when
the bf falls asleep in her dorm room and he wakes up to find her all freaky


is there any place i can find info on the actual true story the movie is based on?
 
effzee said:
is there any place i can find info on the actual true story the movie is based on?
Well, the thing is there might be no true story around this movie. Well, if you think Michael Meyes killed all those kids in rural Illinois in 1978 maybe.
 
King Jippo said:
Well, the thing is there might be no true story around this movie. Well, if you think Michael Meyes killed all those kids in rural Illinois in 1978 maybe.


have you seen the movie? they try to present both sides of the case.

the movie also mentions that its based off a book that was written around actual court documents and crap.. cant remember the name of the book, but it should be easy to find.
 
effzee said:
scariest scene was when
the bf falls asleep in her dorm room and he wakes up to find her all freaky




possession or epileptic seizure, i would be pretty damn freaked out if i woke up to something like that.
 
King Jippo said:
Well, the thing is there might be no true story around this movie. Well, if you think Michael Meyes killed all those kids in rural Illinois in 1978 maybe.

Uh, this thread started with a quote of the 'true story'. You can google her real name and find plenty of results on her.
 
Warm Machine said:
The girl was schitzophrenic. Hearing voices, being ordered to do things, beliveing things that are happening that really are not, and rampant paranoia, are all key syntoms of the disease. You're more apt to believe in something that has been hammered into you than something that isn't and in this case the girl had the fear of god and satan scared into her from a young age and therefor took it on as her variation of schitzophrenic personality.

My GF works as a pysch nurse and she's seen 90 lb teenage girls require 3 cops and 3 orderlies to hold them down so an injections could be given. Demonic voices...well if I was so apt I could probably speak in some fucked up dialect that no one could understand if I wanted to. Levitation...never once have I seen it happen. It is always reported but never shown even where there are cameras about.
I still can't get over the actual recordings we have where the individual is speaking/writing in ancient languages which researchers actually do decipher later on..
 
I saw it. It totally wasn't what I was expecting. Not really GOOD, but interesting. A lot of people are gonna be dissapointed though, it isn't really horror at all. Unsettling maybe, but not horror.
 
Putting aside for a moment that this is "based" (based!) on a true story*, the actual execution of the movie is pretty terrible. I haven't been this completely misled by an advertising campaign since Reign of Fire, and while the movie wasn't a complete letdown, it was just completely, utterly, and so dreadfully underwhelming. There's nothing to see here. MAYBE its worth a rental, but certainly not what most multiplexes charge these days.



(*"Based on a true story," historically, means pretty little in Hollywood. The Amityville Horror, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and quite a few other "dressed up for the sake of drama" movies also carried that disclaimer. Blair Witch also had quite a few people fooled for awhile.)
 
I saw it and I really liked it. Granted, I came prepared, knowing that it was mostly a courtroom drama (despite what was suggested in the trailers).

I have no complaints. Great acting, a lot of aptly placed moments of suspense, and it never stopped moving. Great movie.
 
xsarien said:
Putting aside for a moment that this is "based" (based!) on a true story*, the actual execution of the movie is pretty terrible. I haven't been this completely misled by an advertising campaign since Reign of Fire
...which is what reviews are for...

Anyway, this is what, the 6th shitty horror movie to have a (relatively) big opening this year? Wonderful.
 
FoneBone said:
...which is what reviews are for...

Reviews are pointless, I can't recall ever even bothering to listen to any critic, save the one from Brunching Shuttlecocks. If they aren't being paid off to like a movie, then I'm just in general disagreement with their stance. Anyway, I did go in knowing that there were courtroom aspects to this, interviews with the director highlighted those scenes. The ratio was the problem.

Anyway, this is what, the 6th shitty horror movie to have a (relatively) big opening this year? Wonderful.

I'm sure Cry_Wolf is much worse, and Red Eye just looks fucking stupid. Don't even get me started on the (unneeded) Fog remake and Venom.
 
Saw it yesterday. Pretty good horror movie, I recomend it. The scarry elements are *really* good, the acting is good. The only thing I would say is that for some reason the court aspect of the movie gives it a slight network drama feel to it (boston common and such) in contrast to the more ambitious horror parts which are great. Its certainly entertaining.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom