yes, yes and yes.zhenming said:So I just don't get it. It just seems to me at least that manual transmission cars gives the driver a bit more control over the car? If so why are newer cars such as the Nissan GTR and Lambo coming with only paddle shifters? Are we going to see this more often now?
It used to be that a Manual transmission did indeed give the driver more control...and, in a way, it still does. But automatic transmissions these days are a lot faster and, more importantly, smarter. Since the car can detect and react to things a hell of a lot faster than you can, a good automatic transmission will be superior to you having to travel the gear shift from position 2 all the way up and over to position 3.zhenming said:So I just don't get it. It just seems to me at least that manual transmission cars gives the driver a bit more control over the car? If so why are newer cars such as the Nissan GTR and Lambo coming with only paddle shifters? Are we going to see this more often now?
already surpassed that point . combined with less fuel consumption, DSGs are the future.Phobophile said:Aren't we getting to the point where automatic clutches can engage faster than a manual clutch?
Yes, but flappy-paddle gearboxes just don't have the "fun" a manual has. Its hard to describe.Phobophile said:Aren't we getting to the point where automatic clutches can engage faster than a manual clutch?
Cyan said:Is it really a debate? Some people prefer to have more control, and some people can't be bothered.
What's there to debate about?
zhenming said:newer automatics have "steptronic" type gear boxes, so is that like a cross over??
thesoapster said:Paddle shifting, when well implemented and designed, is giving the driver a way to shift quicker than with a regular manual transmission. However, transmissions like the Smart Car's are slower than what can be done with a standard. Paddle shifting comes from racing. The Ferrari Enzo has paddle shifting, too![]()
Phobophile said:Aren't we getting to the point where automatic clutches can engage faster than a manual clutch?
Zenith said:The clutch is obsolete and needlessly complicates the controls. God knows how many accidents have been caused by someone fucking up the clutch and lurching forward or looking down at their feet.
I don't understand why it wasn't imeediately phased out once automaitcs were invented. We didn't keep the manual crank once we invented the starter motor and car key.
my foreign friends from ze East don't understand why our cars have clutches. it's like a novelty to them.
Napoleonthechimp said:Also, what is paddle shifting?
It's like the active reload in Gears of War, it's satisfying.blanky said:I love shifting manually, I drove a hybrid Civic once for work and it was so weird with the automatic, not to mention the Enterprise dashboard. I dunno, it's probably personal, but to me most of the fun of driving is in the shifting, controlling the revs and gear changes. I really hope it won't dissappear but it seems like automatic is the future =/ It's easy, but it basically turns driving into gas + steering, which is lame imho.
Shifting on the steering wheel:Napoleonthechimp said:I've never driven an automatic but they seem vastly more easier to control so if the majority of cars were available with an automatic option then I'd go for it.
Also, what is paddle shifting?
Eltacoman said:I hate automatics. Manual tranny for life. I hate in automatics how you get go of the brake and the car automatically goes forward. Without a clutch I feel weird. I dont even like paddleshifters.
an automatic transmission will never be smarter than a good driver. A driver can prepare for things he can see coming up ahead, automatics can only react to sensory data from whats happening right now.AMUSIX said:It used to be that a Manual transmission did indeed give the driver more control...and, in a way, it still does. But automatic transmissions these days are a lot faster and, more importantly, smarter. Since the car can detect and react to things a hell of a lot faster than you can, a good automatic transmission will be superior to you having to travel the gear shift from position 2 all the way up and over to position 3.
Tieno said:It's like the active reload in Gears of War, it's satisfying.
gutterboy44 said:The biggest performance difference between auto and manual is during braking. No matter how fast auto trannys get they will never give you the engine braking when properly downshifting. Flappy paddles are shit unless they are on a expensive sports car that can make the gear changes fast. Hitting a paddle and having that delay is the worst.
santouras said:an automatic transmission will never be smarter than a good driver. A driver can prepare for things he can see coming up ahead, automatics can only react to sensory data from whats happening right now.
Freestyler said:You must be pretty cheap if you consider a GTI an 'expensive sports car' - my gear changes are instantaneous when paddle-shifting or using the 'tiptronic' stick to shift up/down. It's awesome for braking.
Zenith said:The clutch is obsolete and needlessly complicates the controls. God knows how many accidents have been caused by someone fucking up the clutch and lurching forward or looking down at their feet.
I don't understand why it wasn't imeediately phased out once automaitcs were invented. We didn't keep the manual crank once we invented the starter motor and car key.
my foreign friends from ze East don't understand why our cars have clutches. it's like a novelty to them.
Cyan said:Is it really a debate? Some people prefer to have more control, and some people can't be bothered.
What's there to debate about?
The Orange said:Exactly. To me, a car is a mode of transport, the less I have to do to get from point A to B, the better. If I could just input where I want to go, and the car would drive itself, I would be the happiest man alive.
It's called a busThe Orange said:Exactly. To me, a car is a mode of transport, the less I have to do to get from point A to B, the better. If I could just input where I want to go, and the car would drive itself, I would be the happiest man alive.
NinjaFridge said:It's called a Taxi.
SIP YEK NOD said:It's called a bus
The Orange said:Exactly. To me, a car is a mode of transport, the less I have to do to get from point A to B, the better. If I could just input where I want to go, and the car would drive itself, I would be the happiest man alive.
way to be dense.SIP YEK NOD said:It's called a bus
Dark Octave said:Manual for life, except in heavy traffic jams, then they can go to hell.
They should make a car that with the switch of a button can go from manual to automatic.
It'll only cost $200,000 for a Nisan Sentra with that type of dual tranny. You know you guys want it.
But yeah, I've never owned a car that wasn't manual and red.
Core407 said:You mean a tiptronic? Yeah, I really don't have issues with a manual in heavy traffic but I can play with the peddles so I'm still in gear and not moving./
bionic77 said:The only thing I don't like about manual cars is that they are horrible to drive in a large city with a lot of stop and go traffic.
I'm used to it. I was joking about the dual tranny setup. I'd never buy anything like that. I've only driven an automatic a few times and it just doesn't feel like driving to me.Core407 said:You mean a tiptronic? Yeah, I really don't have issues with a manual in heavy traffic but I can play with the peddles so I'm still in gear and not moving./
Now imagine doing that with 18 gears, being constantly cut off by assholes in cars.bionic77 said:The only thing I don't like about manual cars is that they are horrible to drive in a large city with a lot of stop and go traffic.