There's a major development regarding Sydney Sweeney

:oops: If she was in front of me looking like that, I can't be held responsible for what I'm about to do.
pWk8JmwnXX1c7Nv1.jpeg

We all know what happened next 😏
 
So people have taken an age old dad joke to infer nazi propaganda? Even in that linked MSNBC article I see "superior" getting tossed around when it's just "good" genes being used that apply to fucking everyone. Ahem...

There's real -isms going on right now that we need to worry about. This ain't that.
 
You aint kiddin




Oh go fuck yourself :messenger_tears_of_joy: :messenger_tears_of_joy: :messenger_tears_of_joy: :messenger_tears_of_joy:
Can you imagine the amount of fart sniffing one must delect themselves in to have such a distorted mindset that you actually go through as a "professional" to write and post such garbage for the world to see.It must be intoxicating.


These people need to be rewarded with a special island of their own then subsequently left to their own survival with no tools except their own rotted brains. Watch them start turning on eachother in less than a day because ofc they would,they have no spine or values. Better yet...make it televised.

I'd pay to see a show like that.
 
When the hell did liberals become so sex negative? I remember when they were all about sexuality and conservatives were the uptight prudes.
they're only "sex positive" when that can be positioned as some kind of revolt against a norm or authority

So, they venerate obese black women and vulgarity featuring them because this cuts most sharply against the norms of western/White beauty. They turn "queer" sexual acts and identities into a near-priesthood in its elevated importance, because those figures represent a supposed escape from the epoch of Christian & traditional moral boundaries or gender norms.

This is where their fetish is: it's in the vulgar destruction, dismemberment, disgust, etc of any kind that can be positioned against a dominant authority or norm.

But in reality, sexuality in its most raw and common form doesn't go actually against cultural norms but generally reinforces them (eg. one of the most universal patterns across time and space is older men of means or power & younger women of youth/fertility being drawn together mutually). So the progressive obscene-sexuality cult ends up vehemently opposing most common sexual expression, and only embracing or fetishizing the margins.
 
When the hell did liberals become so sex negative? I remember when they were all about sexuality and conservatives were the uptight prudes.
The traditional liberal is supposed to be about freedom. Whether it's personal expression, doing weed, or hippies gangbanging in those VW breadbox vans, it was about letting loose. Let the right wing stuffy suit and tie guys and church going crazies be the ethics police.

Amazing how things flip flopped. The extreme left and extreme right are actually the same in a way. Hardcore stances for their supposedly utopia view on life. And any deniers are cast as infidels.

they're only "sex positive" when that can be positioned as some kind of revolt against a norm or authority

So, they venerate obese black women and vulgarity featuring them because this cuts most sharply against the norms of western/White beauty. They turn "queer" sexual acts and identities into a near-priesthood in its elevated importance, because those figures represent a supposed escape from the epoch of Christian & traditional moral boundaries or gender norms.

This is where their fetish is: it's in the vulgar destruction, dismemberment, disgust, etc of any kind that can be positioned against a dominant authority or norm.

But in reality, sexuality in its most raw and common form doesn't go actually against cultural norms but generally reinforces them (eg. one of the most universal patterns across time and space is older men of means or power & younger women of youth/fertility being drawn together mutually). So the progressive obscene-sexuality cult ends up vehemently opposing most common sexual expression, and only embracing or fetishizing the margins.
As a business major who never did great in English class, I had to read your post a few times to get it. lol
 
The traditional liberal is supposed to be about freedom. Whether it's personal expression, doing weed, or hippies gangbanging in those VW breadbox vans, it was about letting loose. Let the right wing stuffy suit and tie guys and church going crazies be the ethics police.

Amazing how things flip flopped. The extreme left and extreme right are actually the same in a way. Hardcore stances for their supposedly utopia view on life. And any deniers are cast as infidels.

This happens periodically. After all, the Democratic party was the pro-slavery party at one point, Lincoln was a Republican.
 
When the hell did liberals become so sex negative? I remember when they were all about sexuality and conservatives were the uptight prudes.
It's men identifying as women knowing they can't compete with real women and so many are oblivious to the misogynistic messaging coming from them.
 
they're only "sex positive" when that can be positioned as some kind of revolt against a norm or authority

So, they venerate obese black women and vulgarity featuring them because this cuts most sharply against the norms of western/White beauty. They turn "queer" sexual acts and identities into a near-priesthood in its elevated importance, because those figures represent a supposed escape from the epoch of Christian & traditional moral boundaries or gender norms.

This is where their fetish is: it's in the vulgar destruction, dismemberment, disgust, etc of any kind that can be positioned against a dominant authority or norm.

But in reality, sexuality in its most raw and common form doesn't go actually against cultural norms but generally reinforces them (eg. one of the most universal patterns across time and space is older men of means or power & younger women of youth/fertility being drawn together mutually). So the progressive obscene-sexuality cult ends up vehemently opposing most common sexual expression, and only embracing or fetishizing the margins.
You are spot on with them embracing the margins. Remember when they were hardcore about gay rights? Well they won there and basically latched trans into the equation and completely ignore the opinions of the LGB of LGBT. One of my gay friends was amazed during the height of BLM when local leaders (democrats) allowed BLM to basically take over the scheduled gay parade in Hollywood. (Controversial) Flavor of the month is all they care about.
 
Top Bottom