UFO'S: LAST WEEKEND TONIGHT

Status
Not open for further replies.
Congressional hearings aren't lie detectors. People testify under oath all the time with stories that can't be verified or that are based on misinterpretations, hearsay, or flat-out exaggeration. Just because someone wears a uniform doesn't mean every word is gospel truth

If witness accounts were 100% reliable, we should be seeing flying orbs, abductions, and little grey dudes on the daily

People "witness" all kinds of wild things. Gosts, demons, cryptids, you name it. That doesn't mean they're real. Human perception is flawed, memories are malleable, and the mind fills in blanks when it encounters the unfamiliar

This isn't some random guy that said he saw an alien in his backyard, it wasn't an isolated incident, and we have a video of it.
 
This isn't some random guy that said he saw an alien in his backyard, it wasn't an isolated incident, and we have a video of it.
Oh wow, a video? Case closed, right?

Come on. We've had blurry "evidence" for decades. Shaky cams, weird lights, and ambiguous shapes. That doesn't magically turn every story into hard proof

I would love to see that video ;)
 
Oh wow, a video? Case closed, right?

Come on. We've had blurry "evidence" for decades. Shaky cams, weird lights, and ambiguous shapes. That doesn't magically turn every story into hard proof

I would love to see that video ;)

It was all over the news. I'm not referencing some bullshit video. I'm referencing the declassified video from the past two years or whatever.
 
It was all over the news. I'm not referencing some bullshit video. I'm referencing the declassified video from the past two years or whatever.
You're likely talking about the FLIR, GIMBAL, and GOFAST videos, correct?

I believe the videos you're referencing have already been thoroughly analyzed and debunked

Just a little taste:

 
I don't believe in any of this. This witnesses don't have a single piece of evidence to present. Why should I believe in any if this?
And it would be very odd that this aliens have the hability to cross galaxies and to do interstellar travels, but when they get to earth they crash...
Only a handufull of alien ships come to earth and some crash. We, with our ancient tech have literaly thousands of planes flying everyday and only a few crash in a full year.
It just doesn't add up.
I guess people want to believe.
 
but when they get to earth they crash
You are basing your point of view that witnesses are wrong on the statements put out by those in power.
They want the tech, did you consider the crash following aggressive action as the reason. Also there is the possibility they are reverse engineering and trying to fly tech they don't fully understand. In either case you need a crash retrieval programme..
 
Last edited:


In 2024, an enigmatic term began to percolate among a small group of UAP investigators. The name was "Immaculate Constellation." Anyone who dared to even utter that term would put their own lives at risk, according to persons familiar with the program. "ImCon", the abbreviated version of the term, was brought to the attention of Congress. Members were told it was a cover term for an Unacknowledged Special Access Program housed within the executive branch, specifically under the control of the White House. ImCon was supposedly a highly secretive program that relied on artificial intelligence to secretly scour classified servers used by the U.S. military and its intelligence agencies to search for and snatch images of UAP encounters.

A report about ImCon, written by an unknown policy advisor, was provided to Congress by Jeremy Corbell months prior to the start of a 2024 public hearing before a House subcommittee. The anonymous author of the report, who had been surreptitiously introduced to key House members by Corbell, had indicated he was willing to testify if requested to do so. A very curious series of events unfolded at the hearing, but in the end, the source of the Immaculate Constellation report was largely ignored, and the origin of the report itself was grossly distorted by members. A spokesperson for the Pentagon denied that any program by that name had ever existed within the Department of Defense.

After many months of excruciating discussion and debate, the author of the ImCon report is now ready to reveal what he knows, how he knows it, and who he is. In this episode of WEAPONIZED (Part 1 of 3), Jeremy and George speak face-to-face with the previously anonymous source of the ImCon report. The person who wrote the report explains where he worked and in what capacities, how he was first exposed to the term Immaculate Constellation, and why he made the decision to come forward, in spite of what could be very serious repercussions.

Some interesting stuff in here
 
Last edited:
You're likely talking about the FLIR, GIMBAL, and GOFAST videos, correct?

I believe the videos you're referencing have already been thoroughly analyzed and debunked

Just a little taste:


Lol Mick West. Id advise you not to put any faith in that hack.
 
Can you at least explain why?


because hes just a youtuber with no real life experince of these systems (not saying hes incorrect), i find leto files quite decent at explain the systems being used, since he used them every day as a fighter pilot

 
because hes just a youtuber with no real life experince of these systems (not saying hes incorrect), i find leto files quite decent at explain the systems being used, since he used them every day as a fighter pilot


Got it!

They Pull Me Back In Al Pacino GIF by The Godfather
 
Last edited:
Can you at least explain why?
I thought his videos were already debunked by actual aviators/pilots? I went down that rabbit hole a few years back but havent been into the scene for awhile.

The thing is, he's looking specifically to debunk stuff, not to scientifically research something. Thats the problem with a lot of 'debunkers'. They want to debunk stuff but they don't want to learn.

because hes just a youtuber with no real life experince of these systems (not saying hes incorrect), i find leto files quite decent at explain the systems being used, since he used them every day as a fighter pilot



Yeah this is the guy who I watched back then

Dietrich and Fravor are probably the only credible witnesses I have time for.

Sure, they are very trustworthy people from a distance. I see no reason for them to lie about what they saw.

However there are many more people with such experiences, both pilots and navy personel, military etc. Even going back a loooong time.

I cant find a specific video right now, with a very old man who saw a UFO, but I did just find this now while searching



Why would these cops from the 60's make up such a story

Or this pilot?

 
Last edited:
I'm not real invested in this I think UAPs exist but this guy is doing more harm than good. If someday we get real proof cool if not it's whatever. I'm not buying anything he says.
 
Well I can see how from the air/plane it might look strange if the sun hits it in a particular way.

Still, horrible of Elizondo to not do his due diligence and show this at a meeting.
he literally used to be on the government payroll. people are saying he's actually a misinformation agent.
 
I like George Knapp but I dont really like Jeremy Corbell 🤣
Something that bothers me about Corbell is that he tends to use poetic/grandiose language. Like on Joe Rogan, he'd interject in the conversation with stuff like (paraphrasing), "This is the most important discovery in human history!" Then Joe and Fravor(?) would look at him, then just go back to what they were talking about.

I'm prone to being romantic, too, but you gotta stick to the facts when making bold claims. Let your audience romanticize it on their own.
 
Elizondo is an interesting guy. The more and more he's out there, the more it's hard for me to take him for anything other than a misinformation agent, opportunist, or both.

he literally used to be on the government payroll. people are saying he's actually a misinformation agent.
Yup, he apparently did counter-intel for a big chunk of his military career.


Something that bothers me about Corbell is that he tends to use poetic/grandiose language. Like on Joe Rogan, he'd interject in the conversation with stuff like (paraphrasing), "This is the most important discovery in human history!" Then Joe and Fravor(?) would look at him, then just go back to what they were talking about.

I'm prone to being romantic, too, but you gotta stick to the facts when making bold claims. Let your audience romanticize it on their own.
He damn near ruined the Bob Lazar episode of Rogan. Corbell is that annoying random guy you would meet at a bar or house party that would try to talk to everyone about UFOs no matter what the actual conversation was about. It's hard to take him seriously.
 
What little credibility that guy had is completely shot. I wonder if he's going to double down or is he going to admit he made a "mistake". I bet he doubles down
 
Last edited:
The most legit account is the one given by USS Nimitz warship. They saw the UFO drop from 80000 feet to sea level within 1 second with no sonic boom produced. It means the UFO had the tech to bypass air friction completely. Absolutely impossible as far as human tech is concerned. This is indisputable evidence that aliens exist since a navy commander and pilots wouldnt collaborate and just make that up
 


Ray Liotta Lol GIF


Goddamn, Lue is such an idiot. Yeah, he 'knew' the photo was unvetted but he still chose to showcase it prominently in a government briefing?

Jennifer Lawrence Reaction GIF


This is exactly why so many of these grifters are so cagey with their so-called 'evidence'- the second they present it, the illusion shatters and their con gets exposed. I think this is the second or third time he's been exposed ...

Now it's just a matter of time before Barber and his Skywatcher crew get the rug pulled out from under them too.

What impresses me more is how quick folks are able to debunk these things.
 
Last edited:
The most legit account is the one given by USS Nimitz warship. They saw the UFO drop from 80000 feet to sea level within 1 second with no sonic boom produced. It means the UFO had the tech to bypass air friction completely. Absolutely impossible as far as human tech is concerned. This is indisputable evidence that aliens exist since a navy commander and pilots wouldnt collaborate and just make that up
Not to mention they have the data to back it up from their sensor arrays
 


Ray Liotta Lol GIF


Goddamn, Lue is such an idiot. Yeah, he 'knew' the photo was unvetted but he still chose to showcase it prominently in a government briefing?

Jennifer Lawrence Reaction GIF


This is exactly why so many of these grifters are so cagey with their so-called 'evidence'- the second they present it, the illusion shatters and their con gets exposed. I think this is the second or third time he's been exposed ...

Now it's just a matter of time before Barber and his Skywatcher crew get the rug pulled out from under them too.

What impresses me more is how quick folks are able to debunk these things.

So he posted the photo and now that it's debunked that proves the point that...there needs to be blah blah blah...You know what? Who cares what point it proves? This guy is full of shit. He needs to go away.
 
Last edited:
This is also a very interesting video of work done using math simulations that can explain the behaviour of UAPs seen in photographic and video evidence that a consistent with Einstein's work

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom