How about step back even further and look at it about what's best big picture? Take the parenting thing out of it.
High immunization rates have tremendous benefits to society not just cause it saves lives but also because less people are sick and thus have less burden on the healthcare system and are more productive at work.
So due to falling immunization rates and rapidly increasing cases reported doctors have to start making new recommendations to just try to do something since they're losing on the other end. Sure, super high immunization rates for all children would probably be a better solution but is it really the worst thing in the world to do your own individual part and get 1 shot ever 10 years? It's not just about protecting babies from visitors, it's about reducing whooping cough in society even if you never see a baby
Yeah, of course there's that too. Can't disagree with you there. I was just saying for the sake of reason that people should spare a thought for the other side of the argument and see where other people can be coming from.
If only there was some sort of organization that helped set guidelines for the prevention of diseases.
Yes, the CDC could be on the "wrong" side of the line. But I feel more inclined to believe experts who devote their lives to the prevention of diseases than anyone's personal feelings or anecdotes.
Most certainly. But i think it does help to show some perspective in seeing how other people reach a view that is different from your own, be it mildly different, to wildly different. Sometimes a different view is actually reached from the same sentiment and starting place.
I prefer to err on the side of caution myself, and yeah, I would follow generally accepted guidelines as scientifically determined as well, but everyone draws a line, often coinciding with convenience.