Jubenhimer
Member
Anthropomorphic Animals have been a part of pop culture since forever. Some of the most famous fictional characters such as Bugs Bunny, and Mickey Mouse, are animals who can walk and talk like regular humans. There is also a fandom entirely dedicated to these types of characters called "Furries". Furry is generally a blanket term used to describe fans of anthropomorphic animals. Yet "Furry" has a sort of connotation to it that distinguishes itself from what most people associate with Anthropomorphic animal characters.
Certain works and pieces of fiction are given the label of "Furry" while others are apparently not. After all, nobody considers Looney Tunes or Mickey Mouse furry work. Yet you'll hear that phrase used to describe something like Beastars or the Modern Sonic games. "Furry" is used by many, as a term to describe Anthro-focused works that are done in a more serious, often anime-inspired tone compared to your typical cartoon or children's book.
So do you consider "Furry" as just a general term for funny animal fans, or something more specific?
Certain works and pieces of fiction are given the label of "Furry" while others are apparently not. After all, nobody considers Looney Tunes or Mickey Mouse furry work. Yet you'll hear that phrase used to describe something like Beastars or the Modern Sonic games. "Furry" is used by many, as a term to describe Anthro-focused works that are done in a more serious, often anime-inspired tone compared to your typical cartoon or children's book.
So do you consider "Furry" as just a general term for funny animal fans, or something more specific?